Wonderful character development!

Save your money for something good and enjoyable

Redundant and unnecessary.

Let's be realistic.

OK - I'm British, so I was bound to cringe at Margot's "London-ish" accent which was - at best, twisted - at worst, strangled. I picked the title because - well, the cast of Margot Robbie and Simon Pegg intrigued me. I also saw Mike Myers on the cast list and sucked my teeth a little but, still - in for a penny... in for a pound!With Sin City-esque (2005) film noir undertones, the story line focuses - in the main - on one night in very close quarters around a (London?) city train station. The attention to some detail was novel - the old money and dress styles placed the film somewhere between 1974 and 1990 - my guess is early 80's from the location shots other scenes - but that is purely incidentals, and I digress...As the movie progresses, sufficient back story fills in some of the gaps - but you can't help yourself from trying to guess the plot as it unfolds. And that plot stutters at first, as you try to orientate yourself to the presentation style - which is very much comic-book. You can almost imagine moving from pane to pane across a page. The shadowy, nighttime contrasting darks and lights drew me to compare the cinematography to Dick Tracy (1990) - which is not a bad thing.The story line itself is clever, if not a little strained. You'll need to suspend disbelief that all of the "required" characters can be brought together for a climactic period which has been allegedly plotted and schemed out over a protracted period of time. The weaving back and forth gets dizzying as the plot progresses into the final quarter, making you wish you'd paid more attention throughout!The acting was - again, for the most part - very good. Notably bad was the dumbing-down of what I assume was intended to be an "East End" gangland script, ably supplemented and portrayed by Dexter Fletcher - sadly destroyed (ironically, since he is actually Camden-born) by the wooden-ness of Max Iron's delivery. To be fair to Max - he clearly spoke the script as provided - so I'll have to put the blame on the screen writer. Margot Robbie's part to play gets a 6 out of 10 (sorry - the accent wobbling all over the place was way too distracing!), Simon Pegg gets an 8 for a solid performance, with Mike Myers coming in around an 8, too (bearing in mind we know Mike has roots in the UK, so it's all good!)I enjoyed this film as a quirky piece which has some stand out moments. The all-too-sudden lapse into gore was a little disappointing and, as others have commented, that finale tied all of the lose ends together but, ultimately, lacked "closure". I gave it a 7 - it could've been an 8 if I wasn't so distracted by Margot's accent which, if you're not British, won't bother you in the slightest!

So much more here than you originally know. Enjoyable on several levels.

So looks like the director is trying and failing to be like Guy Ritchie.. this movie is no where near paced nor as good as anything Ritchie has done. As far as entertaining, its not terrible. I only watched this for Simon Pegg. Margot Robbie is (IMO) not good in this.

It looks fantastic set wise and all the characters but its sooo damn boring.. Your just waiting for people to start killing other people just so the movie would be over.. A sub part final plot/twist does not make up for 120minutes of boring.