You won't be disappointed!

Instead, you get a movie that's enjoyable enough, but leaves you feeling like it could have been much, much more.

It is encouraging that the film ends so strongly.Otherwise, it wouldn't have been a particularly memorable film

This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.

"Ben Carpenter" (John Barrowman) is in charge of beach security for a tourist resort in Mexico and one day, while venturing a little out of his territory, he discovers a huge shark tooth which has been embedded in an underwater cable. Curious as to what type of shark it belongs to he posts a picture of it online. Not long afterward he is met by a paleontologist for the San Diego Natural History Museum named "Jenny McShane" (Cataline Stone) who is eager to learn as much as possible about the tooth while revealing hardly anything. Unfortunately, when the shark begins attacking people near the resort Ben begins to demand answers and finds out that the shark isn't a normal shark. Instead, it happens to be a species that has been extent for a very long time--and it is very hungry. Now rather than reveal any more of this film I will just say that I thought it was proceeding along adequately enough for the first hour or so. The acting was okay and there was some decent suspense here and there. However, the wheels rapidly came off not long after that and it got amazingly bad in a hurry. Really, really bad. That said, I have rated this movie accordingly and I must warn viewers to steer clear if at all possible. You'll be doing yourself a favor.

Let me tell you a story. Once upon a time a boy called Rhys Mogg was listening to Cannibal Corpse to help him go to sleep after a long day farting. He looked into his toilet a saw a great big poop. Out of the blue, Blaze Bayley came along and said 'OC vomit or shotgun' and lots of gummy bears came out of the skylight and consumed him.This movie reminded me of this story. It shows the horror of being consumed alive and is an inspiration to anyone who has ever been digested. The special effects are so well done that I started crying. I do not cry easily, the last time I cried was when my mother had me aborted. The acting is so realistic that I though it was a real story and was shocked to find that it is fact not a documentary, or say my friend told me. I sacrificed a baby to the great lord Satan to find if my friend was speaking the truth, and to my dismay I found out that there are indeed actors in this movie. If you ever have a chance to see this movie, I would highly recommend it as it is a modern classic and a masterpiece, up with the greats like 'The Hero of Colour City' and 'Spy Kids 4'. This is a great movie for kids who love such films like 'A Serbian Film' Just don't forget to look out for Blaze Bayley as I heard he is now shoving bran flakes into peoples eyes. A bit violent if you ask me.

"Shark Attack 3: Megalodon", in my opinion, has to be one of the worst "shark" movies I've ever seen in my life. Every single thing about this movie was so underwhelming, I'm even surprised that they allowed these filmmakers to make it. First of all, it's almost a complete rip-off of "Jaws 3". Saying that is being extremely generous. I mean, in "Jaws 3", the baby shark subsequently dies in a pool at an underwater aquarium, and then its mother comes in and begins to wreak havoc on the town. And that's almost very similar to what happens in "Shark Attack 3: Megalodon". A baby shark comes in and begins to wreak havoc on a small town, and after it's killed, then ITS mother comes and begins to wreak even more havoc.Here are my "Top 5" reasons why "Shark Attack 3: Megalodon" is so bad and should not be worth viewing.1) The actors. The only actor in this entire movie that actually gives a decent performance is the one and only John Barrowman. All of the other actors are completely worthless. Sometimes, you can't even hear what they're saying, and most times, they can't even talk in nice and complete sentences. It would literally take them 2 seconds to say 5 words and then another 4 or 5 seconds to finish what they're saying.2) The plot. Hello? How many times have we seen this type of movie before? "A police chief must stop a shark from wreaking havoc on a small town." Don't get me wrong. This was also the very same plot for "Jaws" that was made all the way back in the year of freakin' 1975.3) The special effects. Nearly 50 percent of this movie is stock-footage and not special effects. They also used stock-footage in "Jaws" during the scene where Hooper is in the cage and being attacked by the shark. I mean, it's okay if you use it for just one scene, not almost every freakin' scene as in this movie. Well, believe it, the size of the shark constantly changes throughout the movie and hell, even the scene where it eats the swordfish, you can easily tell that it's stock-footage. Even when we do see the shark, it roars like a freakin' dinosaur. Now, let me give a little word of advice to the filmmakers who made this: SHARKS DO NOT AND CAN NOT ROAR!!! 4) The action. Okay, so a lot of people do get eaten and killed by the sharks (the baby and its mother) in this movie. But, at most times, it becomes absolutely ridiculous how these people get eaten by the shark. The mother shark, in particular, seems to have a jaw the size of a freakin' mall. Don't believe me? Then watch the part where the mother shark attacks the big yacht at the end. Yep, she's able to swallow people falling in mid-air, able to consume a whole raft with people in it, and gobble up a man who's driving a speedboat. COME ON!!! 5) The filmmakers. Personally, I don't think anybody who did this movie had a clue of what they were doing exactly. These are the kinds of movies that were probably very easy to make. Stealing material from other old "shark running amok" movies, adding new characters, re-writing the same exact plot and calling it a horror film. You know what, it's starting to get old. The director, I guess, just didn't care about the actors in this movie. He just let them say their lines the way they did and decided to cast them in this film. Hell, even the writers should have done a better job with the script.So, these are my 5 reasons why "Shark Attack 3: Megalodon", in my opinion, is one of the worst "shark" movies I've ever seen in my life. Please do yourself a favor and DO NOT WATCH THIS MOVIE! Trust me, this is absolute poor cinema at its finest. Hell, I'm even amazed that it wasn't nominated for any Razzie Awards. I think it most certainly should have.From here on, I can only pray that they're not going to make a "Shark Attack 4".

So, the first question on your mind if you immediately checked out this movie on IMDb is this movie really bad enough to warrant a 2.5/10. And the answer is yes.The only reason I watched this movie was that the scene I saw in a youtube clip looks so outrageous and stupid that I wanted to see it in context of the movie as a whole, and yea is was still dumb and whatnot. The movie itself in general was just bad. The plot was pretty meh. The voice synch was horrible. It was always either not quite in synch or the wrong tone or both. In fact, just about everything about the movie always felt off.That is not to say there wasn't a shred of enjoyment. Watching with a few friends, there was plenty of stuff to make fun of and talk about during the movie, and perhaps the most ridiculous pick-up line ever of "Wanna go back to my place and I will ...?" (yea you can't make stuff like that up...).So should you watch Shark Attack 3: Megalodon? Only if you have some beer a few friends to help past the time, since the movie will not do that on its own...