Good story, Not enough for a whole film

Fun premise, good actors, bad writing. This film seemed to have potential at the beginning but it quickly devolves into a trite action film. Ultimately it's very boring.

A film with more than the usual spoiler issues. Talking about it in any detail feels akin to handing you a gift-wrapped present and saying, "I hope you like it -- It's a thriller about a diabolical secret experiment."

Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.

Even worse than I thought it could be, and I was drunk whilst I watched it. I am a big fan of 3D to create interesting visual experiences, but the use of 3D adds barely a sliver of interest to the terrible cinematography, which isn't even come close to being the worst aspect of this film. As crude as it is, I have to be honest and say that the film earned its two stars because of its sporadic (and perverted) sex appeal, and debatable humour and irony on approximately one occasion. However there is far too little self-deprecating humour (or comedy/entertainment of any sort) to make this any kind of cult/faux B-movie fan favourite. Don't waste your time.

A lot of negative reviews here blame Paz, the lead actress. And while this is certainly not her best work, I have to blame the director for most of the failings of this film. The actors take the cues from the director - how he/she wants the scene played, the adjustments to dialog, the flow of the film, and all the other things that are wrong with this film.This is a low budget slasher movie, but when there are major flaws in the screenplay and directing, even low budget slashers get boring. Texas Chain Saw was low budget, but they created a movie that didn't distract you with stupid stuff.There are so many bizarre things and incoherent twists that the film is almost laughable. Just a few of the issues with the film are: 1. every guy in the movie is portrayed as morally inept - the Dr's are womanizers, the cops are leeches and sex starved, and all they guys in the clubs are married looking to cheat - even the "good boyfriend" doesn't stand by his girlfriend at the first sign of trouble and acts childish (revs his motorcycle when she is talking as says "I can't hear you") 2. the nudity is bazaar at best - ex Paz is shown in several scenes with only a bra on - nothing else. Either be naked or topless, but bottomless only? just strange 3. Other than the 2 main characters, all the other women are clueless and stupid. Nobody does background checks, worries about liability, etc. Even the Danni character has her moments - like she is convinced she was drugged with rohypnol, works at a hospital, but doesn't bother to get a blood test. 4. all the cops just stare at the women when they walk around (and have sex the witness/suspect) 5. all the security guards are idiots, even the armed ones are only there to get killed 6. and there are so many plot leaps and holes it is ridiculous - ex: how did Abby leave, change into a sexy dress, and get to the parking garage exit right as Dr Larry was leaving? And then how is it that she knows that when the car rolls back into the street it is going to get hit by a large truck and kill Dr Larry instead of a small car or motorcycle (or nothing) and thus not killing the DR and leaving him alive to implicate her. For a very prepared serial killer, she certainly left that one to chance.As an example of the flaws, just look at the set of scenes where Abby take Danni out drinking and they end up in bed in Abby's apartment in the morning. So many issues/questions with this scene alone: 1. there is clearly a drug in Danni's drink yet she doesn't notice it, and oh btw, the remains of the powdered drug are left on the upper part of the glass - the opposite side that she drank from. Any sediment would settle on the side she drank from.2. she is drugged, but clearly per the pictures taken participates in the sex and is having pleasure. If it was rohypnol, it is more paralyzing and the pictures don't line up with the story3. The pictures show she has sex with a guy, but the pictures don't match Abby's bed - so where were they taken? And the guy was not there in the morning - so did they go somewhere else and have sex then go to Abby's where they had more sex (6 orgasms according to Abby)?4. in the morning when they wake, Abby is naked and Danni has a top on. So after having girl on girl sex all night long (6 orgasms) while drunk and drugged, she is awake enough to request and put on something to sleep in while Abby stayed naked? Which she doesn't remember asking for or putting on since she was confused that she was even wearing it? Abby certainly would not have put it on here, she liked Danni naked.5. And where were Danni's clothes in the morning? They were nowhere to be found and she had to borrow something from Abby. So did they have sex with they guy somewhere else, leave her clothes there, and go back to Abby's place naked?6. and speaking of missing clothes, Abby gets up naked then puts on a bra and walks around bottomless - with full frontal nudity. Who does that? I have never seen a woman do that - it is either naked, topless, of bra and panties. And she does this 3 times in the movie. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the view, but strange. the character seems to like to "air things out" but keep her breasts covered? Is this a particular fetish of the director?Anyway, you get the idea.It is an entertaining romp that could have been so much better.

My problem with this is the Actress who plays Abby Russell. The actress who is playing a role of a seductive Nurse is I am sorry to say is1.Not pretty enough, I think the costume department and make up did her a dis-service here especially her hair, she is no Sharon stone. The allure of Basic Instinct is the looks and the allure Sharon gave the role. 2.Playing the role too Hammy, the dialogue sounded like she was either drunk or bored.The final act of the movie seemed rushed and botched, the HR Lady what happened to her ?The Shower scene as mentioned in the Boards, why are they still wearing their under garments, if there is a no Nudity clause then don't film the scene at all.Shame really good concept poorly executed.

I admit, the stylish poster caught my eye and I'm a sucker for bad horror movies so I decided to spend 90 minutes of my life watching this masterpiece. And to be honest, it could be worse. It's probably the least realistic depiction of nursing I have seen on film. I love how the nurses don't wear scrubs but instead wear what appear to be "Naughty Nurse" Halloween costumes from party city.The highlight (or lowlight) of the film is Paz de la Huerta's razzie award caliber performance as nurse-cum- serial killer Abigail Russell. She spends the entire movie sounding like someone woke her up from a drunken nap. She makes Katrina Bowden look like Meryl Streep which is really, really an accomplishment. It's clear that de la Huerta was pretty much only cast for her willingness to do laughably gratuitous pants-less scenes. The plot is of course, ridiculous. When not looking after patients, Nurse Russell (de la Huerta) goes around town looking for married men to seduce and murder. Because why not. She soon becomes obsessed with a new nurse Dani Rodgers (Katrina Bowden), roofies her, kills her step dad and basically pulls a bunch of psycho shenanigans. The plot is silly, incoherent and motivations are unclear which is expected. For a horror movie this isn't particularly scary. It is occasionally bloody and gory but any scary moments are laughable. Russell's rampage through the ICU randomly murdering patients is the most hilarious example. While this wasn't a great film by any means, it wasn't as horrible as it could have been. With the exception of Paz's performance this is really just your standard B horror movie with a dash of exploitation thrown in. It's probably great if you're into that sort of thing.