It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.

The acting in this movie is really good.

The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

I didn’t really have many expectations going into the movie (good or bad), but I actually really enjoyed it. I really liked the characters and the banter between them.

Family-patriarch Jack Byrnes wants to appoint a successor. Does his son-in-law, the male nurse Greg Focker, have what it takes? Little Fockers continues the success of the first 2 films and the end result is another great film packed with great perfomances, some new faces like Harvey Keitel, Laura Dern, Jessica Alba and Kevin Hart also some great hilarious moments like a fight between De Niro and Stiller, a Jaws Reference and an insane after credits remix with Jack Byrnes. Fans of the original 2 films will love this film, everyone else? should avoid it for better or for worse i guess. (10/10)

The third, probably the last, and definitely the least of the "Focker" trilogy. All the principles return, only this time there's no real idea what to do for a story and thus this thing veers all over the place. Despite its title, the script is not really about the offspring of Ben Stiller's loins, either. Robert De Niro's character has a heart attack, and so he begins to think about having Gaylord Focker (Ben Stiller) as his successor. Trouble brews when dad has yet another contrived reason to mistrust his suspicious son-in-law. Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand make very limited appearances as Gaylord's parents. It's not without a very rare chuckle on occasion, but it's a hit and miss-miss sequel that is easily skipped. ** out of ****

I probably like "Meet The Parents" as much as the next person (i.e. sorta kinda) but dear God, how did they ever squeeze a trilogy out of such a thin premise? Having Robert De Niro play a strict father-in-law is a great fetch, but six hours of it? Credit where credit is due: "Meet The Fockers" at least gave us the illusion that it wasn't completely useless. I mean, it didn't actually add anything to the original's happy ending, but at least it had its funny moments and also bothered to answer the question "who the hell names their kid Gaylord?". "Little Fockers" can't even give you something like that and feels satisfied with being a discount version of the first one. Greg is still neurotic, Jack is still paranoid and Pam still has no character traits whatsoever, you've seen it all before and it doesn't even distract you with jokes. Seriously, I've never seen a comedy that so rarely tries to go for a laugh. There are like two or three attempts at big set pieces throughout the movie (all fail), the rest is just endless bickering to pad out the running time. Pretty much everyone involved deserves a lot better than this.

There was just one thing I didn't get about this movie: what the hell was it really about? I mean, seriously, from the title we can figure out it's about the Focker kids. Am I right? No, this film barely features the children we have been longing to see cause their parents and grandparents the humiliatingly cringe worthy embarrassment we saw of Greg "Gay" Focker (Ben Stiller) in the first two films. No, there performance are only in passing to actually remind the audience that Greg and Pam have had kids in the six-year interval between the most recent films – but really serve little purpose.Filled with Oscar winners, Emmy winners and a sexy Latina, the cast of the film, too, displayed such an unenthusiastic performance - especially those in the leading roles. The all too brief appearance of Bernie and Roz Focker (Hoffman and Streisand) produced the only substantial laugh in the theatre. Along with a failed attempt to ignite some kind of sensual affair in the picture, the appearance of sexy brunette Jessica Alba as Andi Garcia (I know, right?) simply didn't work for what this film was supposed to be: a tongue and cheek comedy with that element of cringe.Little Fockers' use of recycled jokes from the prequels was also a definite no-no with me and, to be honest, with all due respect to the gifted Streisand, De Nero and Hoffman, I just wanted to get the hell out of that theatre.I just said it and I'll say it; I really didn't get the whole point of the film.As for a widespread critique of the film, you only have to watch Robert De Nero's (thoroughly deserved mind you) Lifetime Achievement Honor speech at the Golden Globes to see how terrible this film is. Just to mention, the film was that tedious and laugh-deficient, I finally learnt how to sync all my Facebook contacts to my cell phone. Not all bad I guess? I have nothing more to say.