100 Million BC
100 Million BC
R | 29 July 2008 (USA)
100 Million BC Trailers

A scientist from the failed Philadelphia Experiment leads a team of Navy SEALs back in time to the Cretaceous Period to rescue the first team he sent back during the 1940s. Things go wildly awry though, when on his return he accidentally brings a giant, man-eating dinosaur back through the portal and into modern-day, downtown Los Angeles.

Reviews
Ehirerapp

Waste of time

... View More
Evengyny

Thanks for the memories!

... View More
VividSimon

Simply Perfect

... View More
Afouotos

Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

... View More
lippylip26

While the premise of the movie is good one thing got thrown out of the cot completely One of the soldiers remarks at the beginning of the movie about the Grandfather paradox effect (go back in time and kill your grandfather so how could you have been born to be able to go back to kill your grandfather) If you have heard of the Butterfly Effect you will see what the problem with this movie is (Butterfly Effect - You sneeze in America and a butterfly drops dead in China - cause and effect can have repercussions farther down the line somewhere) There have been many movies where this takes place in a rational manner Please note this review mentions another time travel movie which shows the problem with THIS movie We've seen Back to the Future where Marty goes back in time and changes his future then Biff does the same thing What they do in the past affects the Future There is a movie called A SOUND OF THUNDER where this concept is explained and the repercussions of what you do in the past can drastically change the future The time travelers there go back to the prehistoric era to kill a dinosaur There is no cause and effect in the time line because they instruct the hunters not to step off the specially constructed pathway to avoid tampering with the natural flow of time The exact time they go back is set to be just before a T Rex gets swallowed up in a Bog so killing it will not affect anything in the future Just to be sure a few minutes after the T Rex is killed a volcano erupts wiping out everything there Also in order not to change the past the weapons they used are modified weapons that will not leave a trace in the past to show that they were there However on one of their trips someone steps on a butterfly and when they get back things begin to change as the revised time storms effect the future as the world evolves differently now Another movie where care is taken not to affect the past to affect the Future is Michael Chritons TIME LINE book and movie This is where 100 Million BC falls totally flat They go back into the past dressed as modern soldiers fully equipped They use 20th century clothes equipment and ammunition Half the team is eliminated ether by the plants or the animals prevalent at the time On their deaths everything is left behind including all their equipment If it didn't change the past in anyway it certainly would give archeologists a king size headache in the future wondering how twentieth century equipment and ordinance landed up so far in the pastOf course it could have been rectified by having the reason why they went back to the past cancelled out BUT as it stands at the moment this was not thought off when they sent them back to the past to rescue an earlier expedition Just a very small DEVASTATING error on the part of the movie producers

... View More
thedanster-891-396820

This film has nothing positive to say about it so I will be honest in telling you that if I told you that the plot had been thrown together by a mentally challenged six year old, you'd probably believe me. I challenge anybody to find a worse film than this one. The plot was terrible, the special effects were amateur and unrealistic at best and the acting was also weak. This film is a complete waste of the viewers time, money and energy as it is about as exciting as watching paint dry. Overall this unconvincing, mind-numbingly awful piece of rubbish hold its title as the worst film I have ever seen. Im not just being a 'hater', this film really is that bad.

... View More
bulls96

Yes this movie looks good from the cover, a bit like Godzilla or Jurassic park 2 (both films 100 million times better than this) but the animations are TERRIBLE and you may think i'm over exaggerating but if you see the animations you would realise how i am being nice. I like dinosaur films which is why i wanted to watch this but even hardcore dino fans would struggle to watch past the meeting of the T-Rex this movie looks like it has come from 100 million BC before computer animation and before acting classes because the acting is so over exaggerated, it's a bit like when you were 4/5 and you played a game (me and my friends called it army)and you had toy guns and when you tried to copy good films you would pull strange faces and look around with a serious faces and lay on the ground and in a deep voice say "go on without me" but the acting in the film is way worse... if you want to learn how to over act this movie is overacting 101.this is just plain bad i wish i could give it -100 million/10

... View More
Scott_Mercer

For low-rent studio The Asylum, this is probably one of their bigger-budgeted efforts. I don't know what was spent on this movie, but I'm guessing a minimum of $1 million, probably closer to $5 million. Those CGI effects, as fake looking as they are, still cost several hundred K to produce.Also, this has actors in it (on the downward slide of their careers though they may be) that you have actually heard of. Usual fare from The Asylum gets actors you've never heard of, like minor soap opera players and refugees from other direct-to-video studios. Also, they did some actual location shooting in Belize. I think it was just second unit footage with no actors in it, but, that still cost them some money. I would bet that the parts with the actors trudging through the supposed prehistoric jungle were shot in some remote part of California mountains.Which is to say that I am willing to grade on a curve here. The producers and director are working with a really low budget. Still, you have to have a good story. The idea for the film was a good hook I thought, but the story is a little confusing. I'm willing to give some slack for "plot holes" since all time traveling movies have them.The acting was really not too bad. These are all experienced working actors trying to do a good job. About the worst moments were some of the death scenes where they get eaten by dinosaurs. However, I've seen much worse, namely in any Ed Wood film, or anything by Coleman Francis or Al Adamson. The music was canned, but it didn't sound too bad, it did sound somewhat similar to a big budget studio movie soundtrack. And helicopter shots of Los Angeles at night (the whole last 30 minutes of the movie) always add a higher budget sheen to the proceedings.If you like monster movies, there are worse ones out there. Maybe if you aren't paying too much attention, they will fool you into thinking that you watched a big budget movie. I recognize that this is not a ringing endorsement. Unless you are a monster movie fanatic, or fan of schlock, I would stay away.

... View More