It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.

Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

Insanely well crafted mini-series.I recall seeing most of it twice when shown on American Playhouse on PBS. Was heavily promoted at the time. I believe it might have been one of the very early mini-series showing on PBS outside of the Masterpiece Theater series.The full length production was shown I believe only once during its first broadcast. Was 6-8 hours total. This length was edited down somewhat to 6 hours. Cut some interesting, but slow scenes.I am very much hoping that the folks holding its current rights do follow through and restore a complete, not edited version to DVD. Not worth creating a VHS version at this point.Would fit in very well in the mini-series or dramatic history genre.

This is the best work i have ever seen on television. The story is compelling--all the more so because it is true. The writers did their homework--the accuracy of events is well documented. The acting is great. This has to be the best role Sam Waterston has ever had. And the black and white cinematography was exceptional. My only regret is that it is not available to buy. A few years ago I contacted someone involved with the production (either with PBS or in England) and was told they had no plans to release it on VHS (at the time). This was a BBC production and ran in the U.S. on American Playhouse. There is such an interest in seeing this--just hard to believe no one can make it available.

I saw the mini-series on PBS when I was in high school. I was a junior taking physics. The shows were so engrossing and inspiring I ended up doing every problem in my text book. I've gone on to become a nuclear physicist in no small part due to "Oppenheimer." I stumbled across this site in my attempts to obtain a copy of this mini-series on VHS or DVD. If anyone knows where I could get a copy, I'd be very grateful for the information. Thanks!

Like an earlier commenter, I saw it in 1980 and have never been able to shake the memory of the gripping story and splendid acting. The dramatic score by Carl Davis is majestically bombastic, as befits a story about a bomb, and hard to forget. The film certainly contains some of Sam Waterston's finest work. He and the writers depict Oppenheimer not simply as an unjustly victimized hero -- which he was -- but also as naive, fond of alcohol, given to mixing with the wrong women and the wrong political crowd, and snobbish, a rounded portrait instead of a stereotype.Dozens of scientists are gathered together in the New Mexico desert to work on the first atomic bomb. Oppenheimer runs the brains, but the general in charge of the overall operation -- building the bomb, building the buildings, maintaining security -- is Leslie Groves, the Grand Panjandrum who pronounces Russians as "Roosians". He's an engineer and constantly worried that these commie eggheads are doing too much talking and not enough work. "We've got the finest scientists in the WORLD," he crows, "and they're all OURS." They include immigrants, many of them Jews, from Italy, Hungary, Britain, Germany, and so forth, as Oppenheimer points out. "Yes -- but they all come HERE!", shouts groves, indignant and puzzled.All of the characters are as complex as they would be in real life. We see plenty of Oppenheimer's anguish as he obeys the military. But in many ways, the figure of General Leslie Groves (Manning Redwood) is the most interesting because his complexity is reduced to a point that renders it easy to grasp. We, as adults, can empathize with ambiguity better than we can understand the simple single-mindedness of a child.He's a chauvinist and a moral nihilist. Instead of a dozen scientists cooperating on different parts of the bomb, he wants to seal them off from each other to enhance security, which is anathema to these idealists. One can easily imagine a heroic John Wayne in the role. "It's INTERESTING? I don't want something interesting; I want a BOMB." (Groves is usually shouting.) He seems almost to set out to make a buffoon of himself in the eyes of all these academics. One of his exit lines from an argument is that he doesn't have a Ph.D. like the rest of them but he's spent eleven years in military administration and construction. "Let's see. That's the equivalent of two Ph.D.s, isn't it?" He leaves the eggheads agog as he sweeps through the door because the only thing that matters to them is their brilliance and the usefulness of their contributions to the project.And when the gadget is finally used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and everyone is watching films of the destruction -- both cities laid waste; prisons, schools, hospitals and individuals vanished -- the scientists are thoughtful and silent. Not General Groves. He's jumping for joy. "One bomb did all that -- and it's OURS!" One hundred and fifty four prisoners dead in their cells? "Right on the BUTTON!" Later he chides Oppenheimer for his remorse, assuring him that he'll get over it. But, as adults, we know that it was a terrible instrument of war and it was terrible to use it, whether we had any choice or not. How many of Edward Teller's "superbombs" do we and the rest of the world have in our arsenals now. It must be in the thousands, isn't it?Of course this is a topical biography of J. Robert Oppenheimer, not the story of the conception, building, and deployment of the first atomic bombs. If you want the context, an hour-long documentary is available free on YouTube: The Moment in Time: The Manhattan Project. It's interesting in its own right.This was one of the finest miniseries I've ever seen on television, and there wasn't a serial murderer in it, unless they were all serial murderers.