Sadly Over-hyped

Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.

I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

Yes, absolutely, there is fun to be had, as well as many, many things to go boom, all amid an atmospheric urban jungle.

For war movie fans, "Von Ryan's Express" is an entertaining film with considerable action. It's a fictional story about an escape of an entire POW camp during World War II. Only, unlike the real escape from a German POW camp in "The Great Escape," this one is from an Italian POW camp. And, it has plenty of action in a novel method of escape – by a commandeered prisoner transport train. All of the cast are very good. The movie is based on a novel by David Westheimer. He was a B-24 navigator in the U.S. Army Air Forces during WW II. His plane was shot down by an Italian fighter plane and he spent 28 months in POW camps – first in Italy and then in Germany. The book is based on his experiences as a POW. When a story is fiction it doesn't make much difference how much the movie may differ from the book – except in the case of recognized literary works. Or, for accuracy of otherwise factual matter or details in the face of credulity. In this case a couple of distinctions should be made about this film and the book. Frank Sinatra's Col. Joseph L. Ryan in the movie tells his British prison mates that he was a "90-day wonder." That refers to an officer who is commissioned a 2nd Lieutenant after three months of officer candidate school (OCS). In the book, Ryan was a West Point graduate who had worked his way up in rank. It's not realistic that a 2nd Lt. out of OCS would rise to the rank of Colonel in three years. I don't think there's a single instance of such in history. The second thing that stretches the credibility of even a fictional story is that a full bird colonel would have been flying a mission at all. That was the regular rank of a Group commander of several squadrons, or even a Wing commander in some cases. Those command officers were not supposed to be flying missions. Their combat flying time was behind them and now they were to command the various units. Of course some did fly in combat, as the movie "Twelve O'Clock High" shows. But those were exceptions. There are some other anomalies about this film. How did Ryan escape that crashed plane – that did a nose dive into the earth? Why didn't he bail out? Where were the rest of his crew? These are questions that came to my mind right away when I first watched this film. The plane mock-up in the crash scene didn't seem real either. It is interesting that Ryan's plane was shot down by an Italian fighter plane. Although it doesn't show that in action, that's what happened to the author of the book, and since this was yet over Italian military territory, it's implied. This may be the only movie made about WW II in which an allied plane is shot down by an Italian fighter plane. I won't go into the apparent reversal of military posture – between the British and Americans, except to note that the film shows the reverse of the usual. The Brits, with their long history and military traditions, were always much more disciplined and spit and polish than the Americans would have been during WW II. And, especially when comparing British regular army with American Army air forces. The POW camp stuff is fun and entertaining. Then, the action comes when the escaped POWs are herded onto a train for transport to Germany. Besides the daring stuff in this larger portion of the movie, the film has some wonderful scenic shots of the Italian countryside and the Alps. The scenes with the train racing against another in the mountains, and the German planes attacking are very good. So, this fictional war movie makes for good entertainment, in a Hollywood style rendition of a war story. I do wonder why Hollywood seemed to have a penchant for showing so many top German officers in films having a woman in tow. That's a stereotype that didn't serve to enhance the credibility of many war films. Frank Sinatra made nearly a dozen movies about WW II and Korea, but he didn't serve in the military. He was 26 years old when the U.S. entered the war. While most Hollywood actors of age were signing up for service – and many getting commissions, Sinatra was supposedly classified 4F for a ruptured eardrum. Eardrums usually repair themselves, and in some instances can be repaired surgically. Perhaps it was something else. He did very well in most of his war movie roles and won a best supporting actor Oscar as Angelo Maggio in "From Here to Eternity."

This is a movie with a pretty standard plot. Pows escaping Nazi Germany. You get your standard dose of gunfighting, sneaking around, and ridiculous plans that would never work in real life. The acting is okay, as are the special effects and the score.You are probably thinking right about now that this review seems pretty negative. For that i am sorry. This movie isn't really that bad. If you're bored with nothing to watch then go ahead. This movie is not a complete waste of time. However, the eloquent phrases and colorful wording that generally come to my mind when writing a review for a good movie are currently absent.Some movies are timeless. Movies like Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, or to Kill a Mockingbird can be watched even to this day despite their primitive technology. Von Ryan's express is not one of these. However, it has its moments and while the movie as a whole is just "Okay", parts of it may pleasantly surprise you.

Von Ryan's Express (1965)Not exactly a Frank Sinatra vehicle, but he is the leading figure in a movie that has lots of ulterior motives. And it pulls off an action film about World War II with pizazz. When the war ended there was a lot of consternation about the difference in the roles of the two European antagonists--the Germans and the Italians. That's maybe the biggest ongoing theme of this movie, and clearly the Italians are being shown as victims and eventually as heroes to the Americans once the troops start to arrive and the Nazi occupation is pushed out. This is set and filmed in Italy, and the locations are terrific. And so is the filming, nicely dramatic widescreen stuff.Sinatra represents, in almost all his film roles, a kind of regular guy who isn't overly engaged but who is gentle and relaxed and ready to do the right thing. He's a real American archetype just as much as Bogart was, and his characters (including this one) mix a compelling personal demeanor with a moral fiber that makes him admirable. He doesn't seduce the woman who really is ready to let him. He doesn't put criticize his British counterpart in the prison until he has to. He stands up to the enemy but doesn't every sound arrogant or nasty. He's the ultimate good guy and is presented this way for the ongoing reason often seen in post-war American films, establishing a national character in film characters that matches the best of what was really in the air and on the ground in the U.S. at the time.It's all pretty wonderful to watch. You admire him and wish there were more people like him around.The plot is exciting as heck. What starts as a kind of prison break movie shifts to another kind of escape and survive movie, with a train running right through enemy territory. Filled with daring, with this one American amidst mostly British soldiers, the enemy is dispatched, tricked, and evaded several times. When the good guys fail, it's only temporarily. And ultimately the good guys, beyond Sinatra's American type, are the Italians, who are shown to hate the Germans and are glad for the invasion by the British and Americans.

I was wondering about the microwave towers in the background when the train stops to feed the prisoners. Would those have been there in 1943? I sure there were some ego issues with the main actors. I have always wondered why set directors never show the shadows passing in scenes within cars and trains. To me it's a flaw.I don't have 10 lines so I'll repeat it.I was wondering about the microwave towers in the background when the train stops to feed the prisoners. Would those have been there in 1943? I sure there were some ego issues with the main actors. I have always wondered why set directors never show the shadows passing in scenes within cars and trains. To me it's a flaw.