I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

The acting in this movie is really good.

There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

There's nothing new here, but it did grab my attention. It's actually quite suspenseful, but the movie did take it's time to build up to the suspense.I've seen a lot of movies like this and it's always about revenge with a supernatural twist. Then the revenge part turns sour. Of course, there are gruesome blood scenes as found in typical horror style. It's a little eyrie, but there is really no wow factor to it. At the end of the movie, I completely forgot about it and got food with friends. If that's how I reacted, then you know it wasn't really a good movie. Watchable if you have the time, but it's not worth the $15 admission price to the movies.I'm a big fan of Val Kilmer and he did a superb job of acting. Deep and mysterious.

The good : if an ambiguously (decent) budgeted horror movie that 'looks' glossy and seemingly has good editing taking place mostly in the dark is enough to make a movie good or scary for you, and you're a val fan, then maybe this movie is for you.For me, it started somewhat interesting, and then unfolded like the Christmas present you never wanted but totally saw coming. Val's face looks so worked on/swollen and puffy that he's either suffering from alcoholism (i'm just guessing here) or some really bad cosmetic surgery. He looks like a 50 year old German transvestite in a muscle(ish) body. It's just ackward. His face and hair are the scariest parts of this movie.The kills are pretty lame only one was decent and that's only by comparison. Keep on Travelin'

This is what happens to actors when they get fat and lazy. They end up in awful movies like this.Remember when Val Kilmner used to be a leading man? I do.Now he's in this bad torture porn that makes little sense. I knew we were in trouble from the first scene when they decide to play the credits over a child murder.The plot is six cops beat a drifter into a coma when they suspect he was the one who killed the daughter of the most senior of them. Oddly, they all happen to be in the police station at the same time when another drifter shows up and confesses to murders that mirror the deaths of these cops.The moral goalposts of this movie are so confused even the actors don't know which way to go, and frankly, it's kind of disturbing to watch Kilmer, who used to do good movies, in this sort of role.A bad sign in this sort of movie is when you are feeling less the suspense, and more the "have we run out of people to kill yet?" Just not a good movie.

When I was in junior high, we had to put on a play about a terrorist hijacking of a plane (weird because it was pre 9/11). That piece of crap my class and I put together in 20 minutes was better than this movie. I mean I'd hire any of the actors in my school production over the actors in this film.LOL the script is even worse. They must've gathered every single person who ever failed out of a script writing class and asked them all to produce this single script.I know Kilmer has been in a lot of bad movies lately but this one definitely takes the cake.LMAO watch the first 30 minutes to see how bad a film can actually be. Other than that, don't even re-gift this DVD to your worst enemy. You'd be a better person for taking a dump in a box and wrapping it up.