Perfectly adorable

An absolute waste of money

I was totally surprised at how great this film.You could feel your paranoia rise as the film went on and as you gradually learned the details of the real situation.

There is definitely an excellent idea hidden in the background of the film. Unfortunately, it's difficult to find it.

The Ice Harvest (2005)Okay, someone tell me why this movie is worth watching. For the almost flashy sets and groovy lighting? For the couple of great actors in less than stellar performances? For the gaudy violence that is neither plasticky like Tarantino nor hyper-real like Scorsese? All this stuff is here. And if you give a hoot about who kills who, and can keep track of why, then you might think this is passable. It's meant to be a black comedy, but that requires timing and wit, both missing here. It's kind of a Christmas movie, but only incidentally.It starts slow, and then keeps going slow (as you think to yourself it'll pick up soon), then it does pick up with casual murder after casual murder. You don't really worry about who dies or that it's so brutal. Who cares? The main character played by John Cusack is typical Cusack and maybe you'll like him (the actor), but his character is a bore and you don't really care that he's about to get whacked, or almost whacked, in scene after scene. And Billy Bob? Also disappointing (and more of a surprise because he's a great actor).Yeah, I hated this movie. First it made me sleepy (literally) and then it made me bored (but not sleepy just because there was so much fabulous violence).The director here, Harold Ramis, has some dazzling successes to his credit, including "Groundhog Day" and "Caddyshack." The writers are to blame here as well, but one of the screenwriters has a long admirable history, too, going back to "Bonnie and Clyde." So what gives? Bad luck? Lack of money? Conflict of personalities? Who knows!But the sensibility is just out of touch here. I would avoid this one by a mile.

A shady lawyer (John Cusack) attempts a Christmas Eve crime, hoping to swindle the local mob out of some money. But his partner (Billy Bob Thornton), a strip club owner, might have different plans for the cash.Is this a great movie? No. But it is a darn fun movie, and one I would highly recommend to anyone. With Cusack, Thornton and Oliver Platt filling the screen with dark humor, how can you go wrong? This is a film where we learn why you do not mess with your boss, especially if your boss is someone who kills people and the police look the other way. We also learn that it is not always good to be known as a "mob lawyer" if your friends and associates are loud-mouthed drunks.

At once brutally violent but often typically underplayed, Harold Ramis' blackly comedic film noir The Ice Harvest falls short of several stalls in a post-Fargo; post-Pulp Fiction world of crime, comedy and violence fusing together. The film has a laid-back aura to it, an atmosphere that doesn't necessarily suggested laziness, but just carries that tag most John Cusak films seem to carry in their overall demeanour, as both the calm and reassuring voice and presence of the man occupies the bulk of proceedings twinned with the overall fact the people in the film are snowed in, bogged down and are unable to manoeuvre around all that much. One doubts many of those interested in the above films or content will find an awful lot of what happens in The Ice Harvest particularly new or interesting; whereas those whom arrive without the said levels of exposure to the above will more than likely be a little bored by proceedings or finding it frustrating because of its tepid approach to what was probably pitched to them as a fast-talking, smooth-sailing crime comedy starring the actors that it does. John Cusak is playing Charlie Arglist, doing so in that low-key and rather tranquil manner he plays most characters; a suave and criminally minded lawyer based in the Kansas town of Wichita, whose forlorn face greets us as he stands roadside in the middle of snowy nowhere - gazing out into the wilderness whilst narrating. The film lends an analeptic shift back to the beginnings of his tale, a story which is essentially the aftermath to a heist; a heist story without a heist, a heist that saw he and his partner-in-crime steal a large sum of money from Arglist's gangster boss. Things go well; they have a head start on the guy through slow communication processes and the plan appears rosy – the only hitch being that clean getaways out of town, for now, must be placed on hold Groundhog Day-style for all the snowy weather and wintry conditions hemming everyone in. Like all the true noir leads, his outlook on life is nihilistic at worst; but a man, in relation to the rest of the town, whose reputation and local distinction carries with it enough in the form of prominence to allow for a police officer to sheepishly apologise and meekly leave the scene after having pulled Arglist over one evening shedding any distinct 'loner' characteristics.His partnership with Billy-Bob Thornton's Vic Cavanaugh is unrealistic at best; this prim and informed lawyer working with this well-built, scuzzy pornographer doesn't ring particularly true and we have a hard time believing they'd operate together – with one the "brains" and the other the "brawn", their partnership has seemingly worked up to now. Their idea of this robbery brings with it Cusak's own verbal confirmation of its severity when outlining precisely what will happen to them if they're caught, the complications that arise out of plans going awry trying to imbue proceedings with this sustained level of threat but not necessarily doing so. One of these complications is the character played by Danish actress Connie Nielsen, whom slinks into proceedings as the archetypal Renata - someone whose first task is to breeze into view in slow motion having just departed from some strip club changing rooms to Arglist's onlooking gaze – the femme fatale with the low voice; free-flowing hair and ability to size up Cusak's male lead character within seconds of meeting him, in regards to what he's done, alludes to empowerment; ability and genre code in this regard.From intriguing beginnings comes a film about very little; a film with a likable enough lead played by an actor it's very difficult to root against stuck in a situation with a great deal at stake, and yet whose tale is ultimately really rather dull. The film is frequently very violent, but violence which arrives uneasily and in a disjointed manner not in sync with the film's bulk, making for a deeply unguided overall tone. Throughout, characters are shot in various places and one even looses a thumb; howls of pain or agony give way to 'funny' surprised expressions, and on occasion quirky one liners, before death or otherwise. The Ice Harvest aims high in the sense long passages of the film play out to not-an-awful-lot unfolding; sub-plots attempting to subvert the main course by having characters explore their ties between others finding room to wedge in with a chance-scenario aesthetic which does not work. Where the film aims are nearer the dizzier realms which made it difficult to forget certain natural instances in 1996's Fargo, instances such as the one in which two criminal cohorts ordered to kidnap someone drive for a long time with only the one of them attempting conversation to the other's stone silence – a sequence which was remarkably played and whose air of authenticity brought about degrees of involvement as what it was their presence in the film for was placed on hold. About an hour into The Ice Harvest, the money's been swiped; Cusak's character is doing very little bar the roaming around with the unwelcome presence of Oliver Platt playing drunk, and the character of Renata is waltzing around as if told to find some other work because one of Brian de Palma's recent noir pastiche concoctions is fully booked. In short, not good. The film plays like a complete jigsaw puzzle whose less than vital pieces have been forced together to concoct a kind of shape, or colour tone, which fits in with what's in its immediate vicinity; various bits and pieces ranging from star power and reputation, to unabashed genre conventions, to better films from down the years that have tried similar material looming overhead all meshing together and forming this: a film from a man whose comedic pieces in the past I have liked, but here doesn't produce something which holds together as strongly as one would have liked.

The movie has quite a few good actors at hand. And I do think that they're trying their best. But I also do think that the movie isn't able to walk the thin line it set out to walk on. Like it tries to be clever and you can feel it trying. And that's not a good thing. A movie is either cool or it isn't.It's also switching back and forth between action, dark humour, Slapstick and thriller moments. Unfortunately not that well mixed together. The movie is just not sure what it wants. Another indication for that, are the alternate endings that were put on the disc. Not that they do shine a new light/perspective on things.I know quite a few people enjoyed this more than me, but I just couldn't. So read a couple of other comments and then decide if you want to watch the movie