A lot of perfectly good film show their cards early, establish a unique premise and let the audience explore a topic at a leisurely pace, without much in terms of surprise. this film is not one of those films.

This is a must-see and one of the best documentaries - and films - of this year.

This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

Like most people, my expectations were low for 'Part III' of the Hangover series, and rather predictably it turned out to be the worst of the three. The first film was never going to be matched for its fresh jokes and hilarious, memorable individual scenes, but this was still a disappointing sequel. Part III is severely lacking in ideas and originality and, while it did occasionally crack me up, the laughs just don't flow like they did in the first film.If this was a stand alone comedy movie, judged in its own right, it would have probably gone down a lot better. I think the audience had unreal expectations of both this and the second film which were never going to be met and, as a result, many reviews, including from critics, are exaggerating just how bad it is. 'The Hangover Part III' is a perfectly watchable comedy movie, not terrible by any means, but disappointing when measured against the hilarious first film.

The film is really loved by millions. It does not often happen. Many people watched the film, there is a great desire to continue it. And despite the fact that the creators are not in a hurry to shoot a sequel. Many people continue to ask them about it in different ways. Many people remember the feeling of pleasure at watching and people want to experience it again. The film carries a sea of positive energy here and fun. The film is not over, and another part needs to be done. Always with their favorite characters. Hold a vote for a good movie. And suddenly we hear the filmmakers. Vote for the hangover 4! We are sure to hear it. http://hangover4.com

So this time the three amigos got caught between mobs business,,,that ends up by returning their always kidnapped friend and their star dump friend gets married,,,announcing( gladly for me ) that it will be the last sequel Its no secret that the first part was a hit because of its humor and risky funny story,,,its no secret that its not an Oscar or trophy movie,,,its for entertainment,,,the second sequel was a bit distorted version of the first one,,,then the third sequel,,they changed the direction completely,,,they gave up what made this movie a hit,,,humor and comedy and made it mostly action thriller gangster movie,,,,are they serious? What were they thinking,what were they trying to do,,,to win other kinds of viewers?? May be fans of pure thrillers? Anyway i don't care what were they going for,,,it came out a disfigured movie,,,very bad quality,,,full of idiocy and stupidity,,the worst thing,, u cant really categorize it,,is it an action movie,,,well its not really exciting enough,,,is it a thriller,,,its expectable from start to end,,,is it a comedy? Well if it was,,,it will be the lamest dumbest comedy in history of cinema

It's hard to fathom why this ever got green lighted. Even though The Hangover II wasn't as good as the first, it still had its charm. Stu hooking up with the transsexual stripper was truly one of the highlights of that movie.Hangover III offers no highlights. The humor was cruel and crude below any level of laughter. Ken Jeong's Mr. Chow is pretty much the highlight of the movie, even if some of the humor seemed force and stupid on a Police Academy level. Alan always had a stupid Homer Simpson charm. In this one, he's pretty much an unlikable jerk. He lost that childlike persona that made him so likable in the first 2. Not even the return of Mike Epps as "Black Doug" saves this clunker.The film starts off badly with the death of Alan's father, which was a terrible plot device for the film. Maybe having Sid pay Stu, Doug and Phil to take Alan and try to find him a woman would have been a better choice, if clichéd. Sid's the lucky one, he gets to drop dead and not live though this mess.John Goodman is wasted as the main villain in the movie. Melissa McCarthy as Cassie is perhaps the most unlikable character in a film since Jar Jar Binks. To have Alan fall for her not only derailed the film off the cliff, but made zero sense. It seemed like they were forced together.The Hangover series limped out to the back, and like Old Yeller, it was put out of its misery. Or was it put out of our misery. The only way The Hangover IV could ever be made is if the directors decided that this was all a drunken stupor dream by Alan at Mr. Chow's wedding.I'd go more into detail about some of the funnier jokes, but outside the bit with Mr. Chow and Stu in Gangster Goodman's house, I really can't remember any, and indictment on the writers more than the viewer like me.Over all, it's best to ignore The Hangover III like it never happened. Just stick with the first two, and treat the Hangover II like it was the final movie in the series.However, if you seek a blueprint on how to truly kill off a movie series beyond all possible repair, please, watch The Hangover III till your hearts content. The rest of us will blissfully ignore it as if it never happened, sort of like a really bad date or job interview.