Instant Favorite.

I have absolutely never seen anything like this movie before. You have to see this movie.

A film of deceptively outspoken contemporary relevance, this is cinema at its most alert, alarming and alive.

The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

This is perfect reason why not every movie deserves a sequel. While the cast and the sfx are decent (best scene: The Fly petting a dog, and the look on the dogs face). But basically this is just the first movie with a happy ending.

***No SPOILERS***This movie has it's own great story, script, great acting & atmosphere. It's definitely better movie than the first one. Surprised? Let me explain:First movie is good directed(thanks to Cronenberg), well acted(Jeff Goldblum + Gena Davis) mainly horror focused movie. Story is lack of surprises. You can see how it ends from almost the start of the movie. But nice horror movie, lack of science fiction.Fly 2 is more sci-fi movie. It lacks horror but gives depth to the story & characters. Ending was really unexpected & nice. If you see first one & expect more violence or horror, don't. See it as individual sci-fi movie. What I really liked about this movie was corrupted people & society. It was so realistic & unexpected.If you love sci-fi genre & like horror, definitely watch this.Thanks for reading.

fly one and two show" pain of childbirth" which is a science fiction lie and medical invention Orgasmic birth and peaceful or kneeling in water and standing.pain is caused by drugs and on the back legs curled which closes pelvis. one good cry of fear after would do.it should have been easier for her to drop the oblong larva. Davis gave on good long cry with one expression through the first film. no thought went into that flies are all female, and Davis would pick up on those traits too. she would have mutated and had easier birth.Davis went from supportive character to prop. We have a cast of nobodies or barely recognizable to replace them in the second.she should have given herself an abortion, and writers abort fly2, the script thrown out before actors were auditioned.

A lot of horror sequels from the 1980's seem to get an unfair criticism. What happens is the first film becomes a classic. A staple of the decade. And the fans/viewers expect a sequel to be of equal caliber and are disappointed/angered when a sequel shifts direction, style, story, or setting. For example, "Return of the Living Dead part II", "Halloween III: Season of the Witch", "Friday the 13th Part 5", "Bride of Re-animator". "The Fly II" falls in with the other mentioned horror sequels as underrated, classic 80's horror flicks that should be enjoyed on their own merit."The Fly II" features a decent enough plot about Seth Brundle's son Martin (Eric Stoltz) and the evil corporation that is trying to control him. There's some nice character interaction between Stoltz and Zuniga (even though their chemistry is a bit off) and a touching scene between Stoltz and a mutant dog. But the real reason to watch "The Fly II" (besides Stoltz outstanding performance) is to see the gore and carnage that ensues once Martin becomes the fly. It's some of the best gore I've seen and instantly launches the film into 80's classic territory! Heads get crushed, people melt, body parts gets ripped off. It's an awesome sight and worth sitting through the dull parts for (like the chase/on the run scenes in the middle)."The Fly II" is not on the same level as Cronenberg's classic but that doesn't mean it's not a great film. "The Fly II" delivers the goods and that damn scene with the dog makes me tear up every time! Only bad part...no nudity.