I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Sorry, this movie sucks

The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;

One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.

I liked the idea of teaming up against him and bringing Nancy ( Or someone from the previous movies) to help them with her experience, also the fact that they put up the light on the background of Freddy, everything in this movie was good. the only thing that made me laugh to tears the (Skeleton's part) , they Exaggerate it . i mean even the idea killed my thoughts , regardless that everything was good , specially the song in the last.

It's a very good thing that Wes craven returned to help write the third installment in the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise. Not only an improvement from its predecessor, but also a visually stunning, inventive & frightening film with fleshed out characters that you will feel sympathy for and get behind. This movie is with a doubt one of the best films in the film series. It has the perfect balance of comedic and terrifying Freddy. Although clearly no match for the 1984 classic It's still a strong film, and arguably the best sequel when compared to it's predecessor & most of the sequels that came after it. All of the special effects are amazing and the story is original. Very few plot holes now and there but nevertheless a great entry. seven out of ten.

First of all Heather Langenkamp (Nancy in the first one) is back!As well as John Saxon (Nancy's father). And it's directed by Wes Craven (director of the 1st movie)Freddy's back! I liked this one a lot because the story is different but it still follows the original idea. You get to know a bit more about Freddy and what happened to him.This movie has horror, comedy and much more which is nice to get a bigger audience, and of course it does. As this franchise grows it kinda goes out of hand sometimes, but that's what makes it special.Overall this movie was fun to watch. A bit weirder then the others (but you'll get used of this at the end of the franchise).

A.N.O.E.S. III Dream Warriors is a truer sequel to the original in my opinion. Some of the original cast returns as well. Of course it does not live up to the original Night on Elm St. but is a better effort considering how disappointing the second installment was. The second film felt rushed and pointless, obviously trying to bank off the success of the original as it was released just the following year. This film came out two years after the second installment so perhaps that extra year in between releases paid off, as this had an overall better flow and pacing with an interesting enough concept. But this film sort of started the trend within the franchise of overblown effects and over the top death scenes, to the point where it comes off comical more often than not. And the last act is anti-climactic and silly as in the previous film. This is also when Freddy first starts to show subtle signs of becoming a parody of himself as was the case as the franchise progressed.Overall better than the second but still very average compared to first.Pros:much darker atmosphere than the previous film with actual elements of horrorFreddy again looks pretty creepy in this like the previous film (one of the only high points of part 2)a young Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne) appears in thisties into the original much better than part 2 maybe because Freddy stays within his realm, a truer sequel Cons:too many effects can lead to silly looking situations at timesstandard 80's horror flick sub par to poor acting from mostfinal act leaves a lot to be desiredSoundtrack: 8/10