if their story seems completely bonkers, almost like a feverish work of fiction, you ain't heard nothing yet.

The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.

Like the great film, it's made with a great deal of visible affection both in front of and behind the camera.

The acting in this movie is really good.

As someone who has always enjoyed the first 'Stuart Little', I found the sequel to be just as charming. Like the original, this is another great family film that can be enjoyed by people of all ages and not just the young kids it's targeted at. The sequel does everything just as well, if not better than the first film.I'm surprised at how poorly 'Stuart Little 2' was received, not only with the ratings on IMDb, but it also didn't do well at the box-office. Considering the sequel has more adventure and in general more fun than the original, I don't see why so many people seemingly didn't like it. I always thought the 'Stuart Little' films were impossible not to like!

28, February 2017 1:04 AM PST | Den of Geek | See recent Den of Geek news »1 Mar, 2017The voice of Despicable Me 3 on the Leonardo DiCaprio, Jennifer Aniston, Michael J. Fox, Micole Kidman, Harrison Ford, Sharon Stone, Tony Goldwyn, Chris Pratt, Ray Romano, James Corden, Catherine O'Hara, Rihanna, Jon Voight, Billy Crystal, Robert De Niro, Mary Steenburgen, Gene Hackman, Ally Sheedy, Jason Bateman, Ian McKellen, Kelly McGillis, Bruce Willis, Willem Dafoe, Helen Hunt, Eddie Murphy, Christopher Walken, Martin Short and Jenna Elfman cast...

First off, I enjoyed this movie immensely.Not only does this movie family-friendly - with absolutely zero content that are controversial, too high-end, derogative or political, but ,most of all, it inspired me a lot. Quite frankly, this story caused my mind to explode - with a bit of imagination Stuart and Margalo opened up a whole new universe. Flashbacks from the first film reminded me that first we saw Stuart was in an orphanage - and that's that, and all Mrs. Keeper mentioned about Stuart's "parents" was that they were smashed by falling cans, which, in certain aspects, raised me a flag about this little mouse: There's more to this character... WAY more. Then questions started flooding into my head: Who exactly is Stuart? What's his history? Who WAS Stuart? Where and when's he from? How come his mouse-form able to speak languages that is understandable to humans? Was he once a human-like creature, then somehow got turned or reincarnated into a mouse(hopefully reincarnation)? If so, what happened, and who is or was his biological parents? If his reincarnation into a mouse grant the mouse power to communicate with humans, then what's his heritage? Stuart sailed beautifully in the first film and here he flies like an ace combat pilot - did he carry those on from his previous life? Stuart and Margalo hit it off pretty fast - like old flames: was there past connection rekindled, and Margalo was actually his girlfriend or fiancée from his previous life? Were there stories to that previous life? What happened? What happens next? ...A lot of these questions overwhelmed my thoughts and I rarely see that happen even in these days' big-budget films(not even Avengers movies can spark that kind of inspiration), so believe me when I say I wanted to give a ten for this film. Though sadly, the ending's pretty harsh: Even when they are pretty much in love, the canary's still restricted by her migrant habit to the south or else she'll freeze to death in winter. Really wish they had not been that hasty to cut off this movie that soon: turning it into a high-level sci-fi fantasy romantic drama might even explain a lot of things. Master White wrote the original script, but he didn't made preparations to my questions should they arise... and now that he's gone those questions became exploitable loopholes, don't they? Maybe instead of all the pointless Disney remakes that could potentially ruin the once-classic tales they could spare some efforts to make Stuart Little great again? And maybe the next one to make a Stuart Little film would answer my questions, if he or she ever exist?

After the success of the original 1999 film the whole cast reunite for this sequel that may be a rare case of a film that betters the original.Again using the classic book by E.B White as source material this film manages to create story lines that is appealing to both adults and children and moves along at a nice pace.The human actors are all good in their roles with Hugh Laurie trying out the American accent that would prove useful in the TV series 'House' years later and the voice acting of Nathan Lane and Michael J Fox is great.Overall a welcome addition to the series and if your family enjoyed the first one they should certainly enjoy seeing what happened to the Little's next.