I love this movie so much

Absolutely Fantastic

It's entirely possible that sending the audience out feeling lousy was intentional

While it is a pity that the story wasn't told with more visual finesse, this is trivial compared to our real-world problems. It takes a good movie to put that into perspective.

Sure, you have returning characters and even some of the key voice actors like Michael J. Fox, Hugh Laurie and Gina Davis. They even bring in Wayne Brady, Peter MacNicol and Virginia Madsen to help fill in the list of stars. You'd think with names like that you could easily create a respectable movie. Unfortunately, name recognition doesn't help a poor execution. Probably one of the biggest issues is that they left the live action combined with CGI format of the previous 2 films. That alone makes me think this shouldn't qualify as a 'sequel'. This film, to me, seems to be hastily thrown together, reminiscent of the type of animation used by kid's television shows - the ones that try to crank out weekly cartoons just to fill time slots. Unfortunately, it hardly lives up to the success of the previous 2 movies. Combine that with a story that's so cliché as well as basically stolen from every other 'summer camp' movie made, you can probably predict the path of this film within the first 10 minutes. It just wasn't worth the time it took to make this film. I know some reviewers gave thumbs up to the voice actors, but I have to ask why. I will say that MJF did do well as Stuart, but the others were just, well, boring. Other than adding their names to the package so you can hope to sell more copies, I really don't see why you couldn't have saved money by going with some unknown folks. Honestly, it wouldn't have made a difference in the final product. For me, quality kids shows - whether live action or animated, will be able to hold the attention of not only kids, but the adults that sometimes find themselves accompanying their children while watching them. This film simply couldn't do that. Maybe it's just that the movie is so reminiscent of many other kids films, completely lacking in any kind of originality.If you have very young children (maybe 3-5), they would probably enjoy this simply because it's animated. But for older children (and the adults that may have to watch with them), I would say it's likely a waste of their time.

School is out for the summer and the Little family are ready to vacation in the forest of Lake Garland. Frederick(voiced by Hugh Laurie)and Elanor(voiced by Genna Davis)round up Stuart(voiced by Michael J. Fox)and Snowball the cat and hit the holiday road. Stuart and his dad join a group of scouts. Stuart just doesn't fit in of course; but soon has his mind occupied with finding Snowball, who is believed to be snatched by a forest creature known as the Beast(voiced by Virginia Madsen). Joining Stuart in the search is a skunk named Reeko(voiced by Wayne Brady). The first two Stuart Little films combined live action with animation. CALL OF THE WILD is obviously working with a small budget and is completely CGI, and not the best by no means. Quality is lacking, but four and five year old viewers will not be concerned. Other voices: Peter MacNicol, Nathan Lane, Robby D. Bruce, Sophia Paden and Kevin Schon.

I must admit that this film was very well animated compared to other animated films of the same time frame. It looks more realistic, which compared to the first two films is excellent. And the voice-over work in this film is by far excellent. Most of the cast from the first two returned, with the exception of Jonathan Lipnicki. But Wayne Brady's voice appears in the film as Reeko the skunk. Thats a plus.Some of the scenes though, very much reminded me of scenes from earlier Disney films. For instance, the lioness on the rock is reminiscent of Pride Rock from "The Lion King." And the name of the skunk is Reeko, very similar to Meeko from "Pocahontas." Even the forest animals are very similar to those in "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs" and "Bambi." The animation. although well done, seems to be a rip off of Disney films.After careful consideration, I gave this film a 6.

Stuart Little 3 has flaws. The animation. I don't like the animation. Ultimate Avengers is better. Way better. But Stuart Little 3 has good things about it, too. It starts with the Little family going on a camping trip. They drive there, Stuart has some adventures, and fights "The Beast". No, not the X-Men character, but...well....I'm not gonna spoil it for you! But I'll give you hint of what "The Beast" is. It's not a flounder! So that eliminates all the flounders of the world. What animal could it be? Watch this movie and find out! Now, I honestly thought this would suck, but it didn't. It was a nice little movie that's fun for the whole family. The first two were better, but this one was still a good movie. So just pop it in the DVD player and watch. They might make a Stuart Little 4. Who knows? 6/10.