Strictly average movie

It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

Unshakable, witty and deeply felt, the film will be paying emotional dividends for a long, long time.

.Like the great film, it's made with a great deal of visible affection both in front of and behind the camera.

Let me just get right to it. I'm not a huge fan of this series, this and the first are the only ones I've seen.But I'll be honest, I was only seeing this for Sarah Butler. This one was sort of better than the first,she's kind of like a vigilante which is kinda cool,but they could of put some action scenesin kinda like Death Wish. I mean I guess I could say some of the death scenes of her victims where alright. At least Sarah was fun to watch, speaking of fun to watch, she was super sexy in that red dress let me tell ya.Overall, I guess a could watch this again, like on a rainy day if I have nothing else to watch.I give it a 3/10. For me, it's just alright but I like Sarah Butler, and she's the only reason I would watch this again.

I just watched this movie and let me tell you... if you liked the first one(I spit on your grave, 2010), you would love this. If the first one had mostly great shockers and scenes and tension, this one has a lot of great plot twists(also with amazing scenes). The plots and plot twists are very interesting and nonlinear(I hate those boring, easily predictable linear plots!). And just so you know , I think the second one, I Spit On Your Grave 2 was really horrible compared to this one or the first one from 2010. I am really looking forward for another sequel and I hope the main character will be the same girl.

I will certainly try to avoid spoilers in my review but have made sure to enter the spoiler warning just in case.I put off watching this series for a long time, I had read previous reviews both good and bad, I decided it was finally time to watch the trilogy. Knowing the first of the films was a remake I didn't have my hopes set too high (however I have not seen the original).I was impressed, I was disturbed, I felt for the character Jennifer Hills, I expected revenge and gore and the film delivered... by no means was it particularly innovative but I sparked emotion and that is important in a revenge/horror/gore flick.Part 2 was disappointing considering it was the same as the first film in a different location ... also I didn't feel as compelled to cheer for the victim character (I've already forgotten her name if that shows how well the movie was executed).I had about given up on the trilogy when I read the synopsis ... Oh what do we have hear? The return of Jennifer Hills, a character I enjoyed. Well heck, now I want o see it. I knew she couldn't possibly end up in the same situation as before so there as hope it wasn't going to simply be a rehash of the previous 2 films. I was excited, still felt some sadness for the Jennifer character, I really hoped we would see her struggle with the aftermath, maybe she would act as a counselor for other victims of abuse and rape, relive her story etc... but that doesn't make for an exciting revenge flick now does it ... I knew there had to be a vigilante angle... now I could only hope that she simply lost her mind and was to become a raving lunatic (Spoiler** Ya that's kinda what happened). Where this film missed the mark for me was from the get go every male character was played out to be the bad guy, even the good guys ... yes I get it, trust issues that makes sense and I really would have bought into it by the end had the Jennifer character met justice of her own ... The ending feels as though it can be interpreted a few ways, the entire story was just her fantasy and she will be set free into society to live out those fantasies (which is how I read it, and it certainly gives room for a 4th film)or that what we did watch actually happened and was now being recounted in therapy (because we do not know what happened with the officer in the park)... This is where I have the problem, to me she got away with it (either having served her time or having only had fantasies which she was about to pursue). They took an innocent character from the first film and made her the villain (which I fully support)but left her as the hero... I know this is all open for debate but I personally feel it would have been nice to see her go over the top, become what she once fought and paid the ultimate price.

The difference between this and the other two is that Jennifer Hills has some complexity, but unfortunately The writer seems to have missed the point. Let's talk about the good first. This one definitely adds some sides to our protagonist. And there seems to be a somewhat decent twists, some good, some bad. One attempt of a killing is not so easy, which is good because there never is a issue in the other two. Now the negatives. The dialogue is flat out stupid, there is no subtleness whatsoever, and a few times where characters repeat the same exact thing worded differently like we can't tell the difference. Jennifer goes through a shift in Act 2 but as the story progresses we see that the attempted arcs I feel weren't done well in my opinion. One more thing, the ending was bad in my opinion for the fact that her personal issue which she had in the film never goes away, so what was the purpose of her journey?