Simply A Masterpiece

Excellent, Without a doubt!!

A lot of fun.

It's entirely possible that sending the audience out feeling lousy was intentional

Irrespective of the novel - although the novel itself could be identical to the movie - the 1983 adaptation Cujo is the message that openness needs to be condemned. Honesty is a type of pain and suffering. In the most bizarre and unique turn of events, Cujo is a film that's about fairness being the abusive and censorship being the moral factor. A known enemy is the definition of fairness, and the definition of sanity, whilst it's a known ally that's the actual enemy. The equivalent of a known enemy is an unknown ally: the solution, according to the 1983 film Cujo, is that actual fairness is the result of having an ally because of no awareness - having no awareness because of an ally. In general, an ally is a force that's supportive. The lack of awareness makes sense, when it comes to sanity and to establishing fairness, but, the exactness of Cujo is that it's the lack of awareness that makes it possible to have an ally. The lack of force creates support.A force is a concentration. A concentration is always after an origin. The failure to be after an origin creates a support that isn't an oppression. The failure to be after an origin is the same as the success of being before an origin - ergo, the objective of creating an ally which isn't exploitative in any way is predicated on having the ability to precede any origin. An origin is always time, and so, the ensuing logic would have to be that it's only outside of time that pure support is possible. Origin is the ability to precede. Therefore success is when reality overcomes the ability to precede - reality has to defeat the ability to happen before something.Happening before something is the enemy. Happening after something is the ally. The moral reality, is when it's only possible to exist after something else. Being after something is an implied inferiority - the moral reality is when it's only possible to be an implied inferiority. The inferiority is an illusion, as is the implication. The superiority is real, however, it's a superiority that's literally incapable of promoting itself - it's a type of greatness that literally cannot brag about its own power.In Cujo (1983), the concept of being superior is the definition of being a weakness that can take pride in the fact that it's supposed to be a weakness, and therefore understand the idea that literal greatness is a confirmed accident

As usual, when I read a book I like watching the movie adaptation.This one goes back to 1983 and it was very scary, even without the special effects we get these days.Several things were changed from the book, also as usual. Other characters are either omitted after a point or dramatically changed. The story is much more focused on just Donna and Tad and their horrible experience.I definitely gagged quite a few times, what they did to that dog was just gross. The suspense and terror is still all there though, even without the gore. The degradation of the characters as time passes is very well achieved.The entire cast was very good but Tad and Cujo are the definite stars here. In my opinion it is a shame the ending was changed so radically but I suppose this sells better.Cujo is a movie guaranteed to give you nightmares even these days. Don't watch it at night!

a good adaptation. a classic horror. a not comfortable hypotheses. short, a decent film. because it is more profound and superficial than you expect. superficial because the past of Cujo before the evil is only a sketch. sure, the fight for survive of woman and her son is important but it represents only the top of the iceberg. profound because the lead theme is not exactly a rabid Saint Bernard but family crisis. this is the axis and the attack of dog - only the element who gives clear perception about it. not the scenes of attacks are powerful but the idea itself of a giant animal, peaceful, lovely, nice, the perfect buddy for children, defined by the image of the funny Beethoven for many members of new generation and a cruel monster covered by blood . so, a decent film.

Cujo is just a great horror film, plain and simple, it just is. Now I haven't seen all of Stephen King's work, although I have seen his classics like misery and the Shining. I actually thought that cujo was better than the shining, but not quite as good as something like misery. The story is just very well told through film, I cannot recommend the book because I have not read it, but I can recommend this movie for horror or thriller lovers. Also the acting is done really well especially by Dee Wallace! Dee really pulled off a great performance here. And she delivers one of the best lines I've ever heard in a film: f**k you dog! Cujo definitely knows what will scare and it uses that. Also I think the run time and the pacing of the movie is spot on. I believe it's about an hour and 32 minutes, which is just right for this movie because really it doesn't need to be long if this movie specifically was overly long, then you would bore and lose the audience. And I think they did a good job at making the dog look borderline demonic and just downright evil. So all in all I think this was a great book to film Stephen King adaptation that I recommend to horror and thriller movie fans. 8/10 for Cujo!