Brilliant and touching

This film is so real. It treats its characters with so much care and sensitivity.

All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

The movie's not perfect, but it sticks the landing of its message. It was engaging - thrilling at times - and I personally thought it was a great time.

If you prefer your movies that have a broken time line, That jump from post time to pre time, with no context. This maybe for you.I deleted the move before the 2nd act. As the Director, tried too much to do a "dusk till dawn" And had no clue how to edit.CLue #1 CONTEXT! As you learn in school which was fully missed here - Less is more.!

Released in 2011 but seemingly shot in 2005. There is even a Brokeback Mountain gag. If Bruce Willis and Forest Whitaker thought they buried this film then they did a rotten job just like the writer/director of this film.Right from the opening titles you feel a Tarantino vibe, you see people having useless conversations in a diner/bar resulting in a hold up. A shootout ensues before we end up with flashbacks as to how they got there.The film has ten minutes of plot stretched out with scenes repeating themselves and pointless jabbering. Bruce Willis appears for a few scenes as a gangland boss who sends three women who have messed up on a previous job on a fools errand. Forest Whitaker is Willis's henchman who is to rendezvous with the women.The film is excrement. There is just a lot of talk, some mindless violence and characters that are not interesting so you do not care if they die. Compare this with Pulp Fiction where you get upset that Travolta's character dies midway through the film.The film just shows that many people think that its easy to do a Trantino type film when it certainly is not.

"Catch .44" is a boring and a really waste of time and money. It has two famous actors who are being used as barkers and nothing more. The storyline of this movie has to do with a job which looked so simple but it hide some strange difficulties.Forest Whitaker who played as Ronny makes one of his worst interpretations of all time. Bruce Willis who played as Mel in this movie he played for about ten to twenty minutes and he also made one of his worst interpretations. This movie reminded me the "Charlie's Angels" but in its worst form.Finally I have to say that "Catch .44" is a waste of time movie and I do not recommend it to anyone. It's a boring movie with no plot and not a nice storyline.

With the exception of the excellent performance from Forest Whitaker Catch .44 has very little to offer. This crime flick really don't have much of a story , and goes the route of ripping off Quentin Tarantino by dragging it out with the overuse of flashbacks. While not as goofy as a Tarantino film , he is an obvious influence .Even Bruce Willis can't save this sinking ship as it centers on three(very hot, but largely uninteresting ) girls who are on a job to steal money from a huge dope deal. The movie however is not dope and now I know why this went direct to video ,it sucks. Catch .44 chooses style over substance and is a waste of the talents of Forest Whitaker and Bruce Willis.