Zombieland
Zombieland
| 19 April 2013 (USA)
SEASON & EPISODES
  • 1
  • Reviews
    Matialth

    Good concept, poorly executed.

    ... View More
    Breakinger

    A Brilliant Conflict

    ... View More
    Ezmae Chang

    This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

    ... View More
    Guillelmina

    The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

    ... View More
    Vlad

    I thought it was pretty funny. I was actually hoping that this would become a TV series. I have to admit I was pretty disappointed to see that it didn't go anywhere. I didn't realize it was the movie made into a TV show. I just thought it was a new TV show and it was pretty funny. It feels like a parody to zombie movies but at the same time it feels like it has plenty of actual action. It's just a funny and a little crazy zombie flick that I was looking forward to as a series. Seems like my wish will not be granted anytime soon. Hopefully somebody reads the reviews and decides to make it a show still. You have to keep in mind this sort of comedy is not for everyone but I'm sure the people that like zombie movies and comedies like Reno 911 or Workaholics and this sort of thing would enjoy it.

    ... View More
    Horst in Translation (filmreviews@web.de)

    This half-hour pilot unfortunately did not get picked up for a TV series.It's a sequel to the popular movie Zombieland starring Eisenberg, Stone, Harrelson and Breslin. Unfortunately, they did not manage to get any of the original actors on board, so they added a completely new quartet of actors that all have done some TV work before, but not too known. The most famous of the bunch may be Maiara Walsh, who had a recurring character on "Desperate Housewives" for example. However, what was maybe lacking with the cast, got put right with the crew. The writers from the movie also wrote this short film and the director is the one from "Tucker and Dale vs Evil".All in all, it was an entertaining 30 minutes that had me hooked quite from the start because Tim Bagley is always a welcome presence for me. I wasn't really fond of Walsh's performance, but everybody was pretty okay with what they were given. I don't believe it was a lot worse than the film it is based on, here and there acting-wise maybe, but the story was equally good. It had weaker parts like the count, but I could bear with these thanks to the funnier highlights like for example how everybody they run into gets massacred by the zombies somehow. The skyscraper window cleaner particularly had me in stitches. It's unlikely somebody will ever watch this if he hasn't seen the film, but if you liked it, this one's definitely worth a watch, also thanks to the zombie seniors near the end. It's maybe hurt a bit by the lack of romance aspect and that the whole story obviously is no longer as innovative before the movie and The Walking Dead, but it can still make for an entertaining 30 minutes.

    ... View More
    bradleykirksey

    I loved the movie Zombieland. I've seen it a handful of times, and it cemented my man-crush on Jesse Eisenberg. It's a funny movie that balances the absurd, the funny, and packs a nice moral without ever even approaching heavy-handed.When I heard there was a TV show with no Eisenberg or Harrelson or Stone or Breslin, all stocked with actors I didn't know or didn't like, I wasn't so happy. I said it was going to be awful and that I wouldn't watch it.The result is better than I expected, but not what the movie offered, and frankly, if you go into it expecting the movie again, you'll be disappointed.The movie had some fun dialogue and a present but subtle point. The TV show is much better at slap-stick gags. It showed a commitment to the dialogue and the theme and the character development, but it was honestly boring. That part is not written nearly as well as the movie, and I strongly suspect that it won't get better over time. The slapstick gags are funny though. While predictable, there were several times I laughed out loud, which is something I seldom do for slap-stick comedy, especially if I go into it promising myself to dislike it. I had some really nice chuckles, which I seldom get from TV shows.While I understand that this was never going to be the original part II, there was one major change I seriously disliked. In the original, Tallahassee was insane, neurotic, but the smartest one of the whole bunch in his own twisted way. Columbus was the bumbling clueless one, and Tallahassee was the one who protected him from zombies and girls. In the TV show, Tallahassee has lost about 50 IQ points. He went from an insane but bright zombie killing machine to a guy who to quote the show "asks for price checks at a 99 cent store." They did a decent job at capturing everyone else's character, but they practically killed Tallahassee.The original Zombieland starred four actors with a combined four Oscar nominations. The TV show stars four people that I had barely heard of. The believably is a little stretched, Wichita no longer looks like Emma Stone, and Eisenberg's narration is no longer as fast or clear as it used to be. The storyline isn't as well written or as well acted as it was before. But it's funny. It's a TV show, so you were never going to get Eisenberg back. You were never going to get Hollywood writers working on a draft for years at a time. But it has some things right. In addition to some nice cheap laughs, it has the theme right. At the end of it all when the zombies get to us, what are you going to miss? It won't be TV, it won't be IMDb. It'll be people. As much as Wichita and the others don't want to hear it, the show keeps the family motif right, and Tallahassee still demonstrates that if life is worth living, it's worth living now. To quote the show, "If God sent you back to Earth five minutes, and those five minutes was right now, what would you do with it?" It's an important question that too many people never ask. They get up, go to a job they hate, eat food they dislike, come back to a family they resent, and spend their whole lives looking forward to the weekend, which always disappoints. And the show, like the movie, promises that there's more, and it's all around you right now. The TV show is probably heavier handed than this review while the movie was very beautifully subtle, but it's there. The TV show might be very different in form and delivery, but when it comes down to the point, it's the same in substance.So the rating breakdown goes like this for people: A handful of zombie apocalypse nuts giving this a 10, a bunch of frustrated people who wanted more of the movie giving it a 4, and a few people in the middle who like it for what it is, not what it isn't.

    ... View More
    Dain Slatton

    Right off the bat this show seriously annoyed me with the complete lack of any original ideas. Don't get me wrong. I wasn't expecting much, but they couldn't even go so far as to create new characters for the new cast, who look and act nothing like the characters from the movie. Basically the whole show is just some terrible attempt to get ratings based on the viral name of the movie. I would have been able to tolerate the show if they could have been bothered to create a new story, rather than trying to continue the already completed one at any cost. The acting ranges from okay to painfully bad, the writing is worse, and the action is completely unrealistic. I find myself struggling to watch it. I'm gonna go watch walking dead reruns. At least they are well written and generally well performed.

    ... View More