666 Park Avenue
666 Park Avenue
TV-14 | 30 September 2012 (USA)
SEASON & EPISODES
  • 1
  • Reviews
    Nonureva

    Really Surprised!

    ... View More
    Protraph

    Lack of good storyline.

    ... View More
    Anoushka Slater

    While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.

    ... View More
    Darin

    One of the film's great tricks is that, for a time, you think it will go down a rabbit hole of unrealistic glorification.

    ... View More
    roxyfu

    Could not believe when I heard this had been canceled. I loved this show it had everything mystery, seduction. Etc I was always on the edge of my seat waiting for what was going to come next. Put it back on bring series 2. Damn u American TV companies what us wrong with you, you seem to always cancel the good shows. They need to find a way of how to calculate TV ratings by being recorded as well as being watched as some people have stupid working hours so are unable to watch it when it's on so they set record. With all the technology in the world today you would think they would be able to figure that out. Very disappointed customer who has been left hanging with unanswered questions.

    ... View More
    Clifford Nelson

    This show started out on the slow side but improved, and you can see that from the ratings. Then the writers started to writing a lot more twists to the story, and the ratings improved. The network never adverted the show, and put it at a bad time. Unfortunately seems like it is very difficult for a scripted show to survive. This show had a lot of possibilities, and would have probably gotten even better with time. Hate those reality shows. They are like watching WWF, equally fake, and ultimately boring. Would be nice if a cable network took it over, and they could make it racier. Doubt it could ever beat out American Horror Story, but maybe get close to Lost. Grimm certainly got better the 2nd season, and think it was because the show got more money, and think more money could make this show much better.

    ... View More
    carol-sparks

    This show started out with great potential. Good story line. However, as weeks went by, it just fell short of expectations. Terry O'Quinn was excellent in his role. However, the other actors including the 2 female leads, Vanessa Williams and Rachael Taylor just fell flat. The show was fairly boring with Rachael Taylor forever running around the hotel bumping into silly pseudo scary events that never ever seemed to develop well. Spoon feeding the interesting parts with a tiny baby spoon stretched out over 4 episodes. Rachael's goody two-shoes relationship with her husband was not believable. Vanessa Williams was boring; her role contributed nothing to the show other than Terry O'Quinn's wife - their relationship was not believable either. If they had made the characters more interesting with a little more depth and added some authentic action, might have been a great watch. Back to the drawing board with that one. Really needs a overhaul.

    ... View More
    Erhan Aslan

    I cannot say this TV show is the best one. However, according to me, half of the Hollywood TV shows are made in vain, this one is a lot more watchable than many others. Some critics showed up "oh, this one is just like Keanu's film! Let's do not watch it". OK, let's leave these perfectionists to watch nothing after "the big bang theory" or "how I met your mother"!I think this one must have got higher rates than 7.2 as currently; it could be 7.6 or 7.8. Therefore, by giving a rate of 10, I just now made a very very small adjustment.Terry O'Quinn's classical act from the TV show "Lost" is just like similar here. Again, he has a mystical role, and he keeps making us to ask the question "who are you man?".Rachael Taylor, having the leading role, really deserves to be in this role. But, I wish Helena Mattsson would play a good person not losing her current style and mood in the Show.

    ... View More