What a waste of my time!!!

hyped garbage

It isn't all that great, actually. Really cheesy and very predicable of how certain scenes are gonna turn play out. However, I guess that's the charm of it all, because I would consider this one of my guilty pleasures.

An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

I always had a peculiar fondness for the "Wrong Turn" franchise. It's certainly not the greatest horror series out there, but at least the installments all guarantee unpretentious and straightforward splatter-entertainment. After a new sequel every two year since 2007, the series seems to have halted since 2014, but I'll cheerfully keep watching more sequels when they come, even if they make another twenty-six of them! Part 6 makes one horrible mistake, however, namely that the new director Valeri Milev and writer Frank H. Woodward tried to tell an ambitious story with depth and character background. Bad idea; - the reasons why parts 2, 3 and 4 were so entertaining are that the plots are simple and the gore is utterly disgusting. Here, they come up with a far-fetched and completely implausible story about an introvert and half-depressed New Yorker inheriting a humongous hotel/spa resort in Hobb Springs, West-Virginia. Danny heads over there, together with a large group of his friends, and finds that the two caretakers are trying to show that he's part of a secluded (read: inbred) mountain family clan. Meanwhile, the trio of deranged mutant hillbillies from the previous films joyously slaughter Danny's friends and half of the nearby town. It's best not to contemplate too much about the "plot". Exactly how did a West-Virginian hillbilly-baby end up in New York? How can two incestuous freaks possibly run a giant hotel? Why isn't anybody investigating the dozens of missing person cases? Part 6 contains loads of gratuitous sex, usually immediately followed by revolting killings. The biker girl at the beginning is the prettiest actress of the bunch, especially naked, but she's only a random casualty whose face gets sawn in half with barbed wire. The special effects are okay, albeit often too extreme and sickening just for the sake of being sickening. I'm not complaining about that, though, since that is exactly why people like me are watching series like "Wrong Turn".

Absolute crap is all I can say about this film. I loved the other wrong turn films but this one is by far the worst.Bad acting, bad storyline and even the DVD extras were rubbish.Avoid this film!

This is an awful movie. If you want to see a really scary movie this October see Dracula (1931). Do not see this. It is awful. The first movie of Wrong Turn is a good movie. So is Wrong Turn 2. Wrong Turn 3 is an awful movie. And this is worst. Wrong Turn 4 is an awful movie. And this is worst. Wrong Turn 5 is a very awful movie. I did think there could be a worst movie then Wrong Turn 5 and then I saw this. 4.1 is a bad ratting. But this is such an awful movie that 4.1 is overrating it. This is one of the worst horror movies of all time. It is not scary. The story line awful. It is over the top gross. It has an awful ending.

I know I am a little late in submitting my comments to this latest (to date) entry in the WRONG TURN series, though considering how bad the previous entry was, you might understand my reluctance to continue with this series. But today I finally did, and my pre- viewing feelings that I was not missing anything proved to be correct. There are many things that go wrong with this entry, and most of them have to do with the sorry script. For starters, there are a whole bunch of unanswered questions, ranging from why the lead protagonist had been put up for adoption to why his family members needed him for their big plan in the first place when they had each other to work with. The story is also poorly paced - as others here have noted, you have to wait until the last fifteen or so minutes before most of the protagonists find themselves in deep poop. (There is a LOT of padding in this movie.) The protagonists, incidentally, are all obnoxious and unlikable to a large degree. As for the bad guys, for some reason the screenplay has Three Finger and his two partners in murder moved to become secondary characters.So you may be wondering why I somehow found this entry better than the sorry part 5. Well, there are a few good touches to be found in this mess if you're patient. For starters, the movie looks a lot better than the cheap and cheesy previous entry - it looks more expensive, with some decent locations and sets. The movie also has a good dash of gratuitous sex and nudity. And there are some nice gory bits, most of it thankfully accomplished with old school special effects instead of unconvincing CGI effects. All this makes the movie a little more bearable than part 5... though I feel I should make clear that the movie overall still isn't very good. If 20th Century Fox does get around to making a part 7, I'm going to skip it unless I hear a LOT of good reports about it.