The greatest movie ever made..!

Self-important, over-dramatic, uninspired.

A lot of perfectly good film show their cards early, establish a unique premise and let the audience explore a topic at a leisurely pace, without much in terms of surprise. this film is not one of those films.

One of those movie experiences that is so good it makes you realize you've been grading everything else on a curve.

Film students' graduation movies are often somewhat rough around the edges and suffer from low distribution, but sometimes there are gems to be found among them too. A good example would be Jukka-Pekka Valkeapää's beautifully enigmatic The Visitor (2008), but Tero Molin and Tommi Lepola's epic genre-crosser The Book of Fate is well worth a watch as well.Much larger and expensive a production than an average film school graduation work, The Book of Fate tells the story of a mysterious cosmic book written long ago by an ancient race of powerful beings. Once thought to be lost forever, the Book has now been located on Earth and keeps appearing in various places in different eras of history. The story is divided into five segments: an 18th century vampire horror flick, a stylized western, a gritty Winter War portrayal, a modern techno-thriller and a futuristic science fiction finale. Each segment is about 15 minutes in length and stars recently graduated acting students Juha-Pekka Mikkola and Johanna Kokko in various roles. All the stories are concluded at the end, and the priest character from the first segment makes dream-like appearances in the other stories as well.It is obvious that the writer-directors Lepola and Molin are very familiar with the conventions of the genres they utilize in their story. The ultra-cool gunslinger with no name and the quiet, tense stand-offs and shootouts of the western segment are clearly influenced by the legendary Dollar trilogy by Sergio Leone, while the present day agent thriller plays out like a mash-up of James Bond plot lines and the suave style of The Matrix trilogy. The grainy black and white Winter War segment evokes memories of the legendary The Unknown Soldier (1955), often considered the definitive war film in Finland. When the film's tagline is "repetition is the mother of learning", it is obvious that the movie has been written with a wink in the eye, so strict demands for originality are not reasonable here – The Book of Fate is basically five genre movies in one.The fragmented nature of the narrative allows the filmmakers to demonstrate their aptitude for very different styles of presenting a scene. The lighting, cinematography, camera work and music change from one segment to another, always staying true to the traditional style of the genres covered. I especially liked the yellow and sepia tones of the western segment and the cold, stark colours of the present day scenes. The martial arts and the gunplay in the agent thriller are also pretty cool and decently planned, even if not as smooth and fast as in "real" big budget actioners. The bright white glow of the final segment on an isolated space ship is pleasing to the eye as well, but the gloomy vampire tale at the beginning feels a bit too dark at points. Also, the black and white photography of the Winter War scenes could have been starker, although in a way the grayness enhances the realistic atmosphere.Besides the aspects mentioned above, the diverse sets deserve a nod too; the film cleverly utilizes existing locations (such as the yard of a roofless church, the Särkänniemi amusement park and the Wild West village in Ähtäri) to cut corners in the set design budget that could have otherwise grown very large. The costumes and makeup are very well created too, particularly in the western, thriller and sci-fi segments.Besides the two lead actors Mikkola and Kokko who appear as protagonists in every segment, many well-known Finnish veteran actors make appearances in the different eras of the film's timeline. Especially Vesa Vierikko is both funny and cool as the mad scientist Strömberg in the present day segment and the legendary Åke Lindman boils in rage in his very last credited movie role as the intergalactic leader Galagf in the sci-fi scenes. Smaller roles have also been given to ex-wrestler Tony Halme (playing a bulky commander), "the man without a past" Markku Peltola (a scientist) and Santeri Kinnunen (an Army lieutenant). A lot of the acting is somewhat stiff and theatrical (using formal textbook language doesn't help either), but it doesn't really bother me much since the movie is largely an homage to genres that are not known for world-class acting in the first place.Even though none of the individual segments can be called a masterpiece, together they make a very entertaining whole. For a Finnish student film The Book of Fate is an extraordinary achievement, but even when compared to real genre flicks from which Molin and Lepola have drawn their inspiration, the movie is not terrible at all in spite of the appallingly low IMDb rating (3.7/10 with 436 votes at the time of writing this). There is also a lot of humour thrown in; luckily it is not the boring We-Know-We-Are-Making-a-Bad-Movie kind of intentional crappiness, but instead subtler references to the clichés of each genre (stay tuned for the hilarious post-credit faux-trailer). Fully acknowledging its diverse cinematic roots, The Book of Fate is a movie for film buffs by fellow film buffs; warmly recommended to any cinephile with an eclectic taste in popular cinema.

Book Of Fate doesn't compete in the Major League, but it is nevertheless a Champion in it's own right. You'll have to put yourself in the right context: this is not a Hollywood production, not even a b-class movie with still decent budget. This is a very low-budget movie - we are talking about probably some few thousand dollars at most, no more. In fact the movie is a thesis for the two directors. Still they managed to get some of the finest Finnish professional actors in, and even the soundtrack is filled with internationally famous Finnish rock and heavy metal bands (like Nightwish with over 1.5 million records sold). These acts alone are noteworthy.The main idea of the movie are the struggles of an "eternal champion", and the idea is not very far from the themes of author Michael Moorcock. Also, it takes courage to select five totally different genres (horror, western, war, action thriller and SF) and combine them in an episode movie.This movie seems to divide opinions very much - and that's understandable. If you are a kind of person who is interested only in the technical details and finesse over the contents, you will be disappointed. But if you are able to see behind the financial and technical limits, you may appreciate the over-the-top pastiches of these genres, and the enthusiasm behind. Sure, the CGI-effects may be a little cranky - but so were the CGI-images of the excellent series Babylon 5. In my opinion, the only true limitations are in the people's imagination, not in the technical limitations.As far as I'm concerned, the results were highly satisfactory - I had no expectations of this movie, but I found myself entertained. And that's what this movie is all about.

Okay, so it isn't the Epic Finnish Movie Spectacle of 2003. It isn't Art with capital A.But who cares.Judging all measurements, this movie should be a turkey. The whole idea is so patently ludicruous that This Movie Just Can't Be Good. Shameless mixing of genres, unexperienced moviemakers, and, good heavens, Tony Halme.But surprise surpise - for some reason, this thing was watchable. *Very* watchable. Sure, it looks a bit cheesy here and there, might have needed some extra care at some times and places... but overall, the lasting impression I got was that This Isn't A Gigabuck Hollywood Movie But It Sure Looks Like One.But then again, I like movies that knowingly play with cliches of the genre, or genres in this case. Running jokes rule. And obviously the makers have had fun, which has to count for something...People seem to severely dislike the special effects - and I think this is unjustified, it's just amazing that they did it *this* good with *that* sort of money.And the plot wasn't *that* bad. Honestly.Cult classic material. Definitely.As a movie: *** As a parody of Hollywood: *****

Totally crap, amateur actors and terrible storyline - i was really disappointed.If you don't have better things to do than watch this film, i feel sorry for you =)