Very well executed

Overrated

Am i the only one who thinks........Average?

The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

Big Pharma is experimenting with memory enhancement drug A9913 for possible use with Alzheimer patients. They pay college kids $2,000 to spend the weekend at their facility with half getting the real drug, the other half placebo. The film follows Ann (Virginia Gardner) who has good ESP to begin with. The drug has side effects as Ann and others see the future which is grim considering there is a killer loose at the facility...snowed in...phones down. It starts out like a pretty good sci-fi film, introducing characters, who for a change, I didn't hate. However once we get to seeing the killings and trying to outsmart the killer, the meat of the film, it comes loose with characters running around like a chicken with its head cut off, adding boring to confusion. On the plus side, it wasn't a hand held camera. Ari streaming has it available for free app downloading.Guide: No sex or nudity

The unemployed waitress Anna (Virginia Gardner) joins a group of college student in the isolated facility of the Hallorann Laboratory to participate in the research of Dr. Jerrems (William Mapother) to improve the memory and raise some money. Dr. Jerrems explains that only half of them will be injected with the drug – the other half will be injected with harmless placebo. Anna befriends Den (Nathan Kress), Kristen (Kirby Bliss Blanton) and Marcus (Mark Furze) and soon Marcus and Kristen are affected by an unexpected side effect and have the ability to see the future. Anna is also affected and discovers that she can see the other youngsters dying and Dr. Jerrems locks her in a room. Meanwhile a stranger breaks in the facility and there is bloodshed in the place. Den, Marcus, Kristen and Scratch (Ryan Higa) try to flee but Den wants to save Anna. Who might be the killer and what is his motive?"Tell me How I Die" is a low-budget horror movie with a promising and intriguing beginning but also with an awful conclusion. The idea of a drug that gives the ability to see the future should be better explored instead of using the stupid clichés of the genre. My vote is three.Title (Brazil): Not Available.

For a low budget movie is actually pretty good -Interesting story(don't recall nothing similar)-Good scenarios -Pretty decent acting(I can really see that Ryan Higa isn't used to this, it's pretty different from what he is used to do but it was a decent acting by him)Actually managed to watch the hole movie with only 1 stop which rarely happens due to getting boredThe only bad thing I noticed was so poorly used green screens overallsome bad compositing.Good movie would watch again

The movie was already mediocre in terms of acting and editing. But what really bothered me was the amateurish mistake halfway into the movie. Basically at one point, the test subjects find out they're being watched behind the glass doors and acted surprised, the blonde girl says "they've been watching us this whole time" as if she didn't expect it.. However, at the beginning of the movie, the doctor clearly stated that they will be monitored the whole time there... Not to mention the fact that they've signed up to be test subjects in a science facility.. being monitored is completely normal in these type of trials. Terrible writing IMO