I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

How sad is this?

The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Was really looking forward to this but the movie just left me feeling utterly let down,bad writing and screenplay shocking really,it wouldnt have been hard to come up with a convincing story with a few laughs but movie was just flat, i give it a generous 2. how on earth it has all these 10 ratings in unbelieveable must be people involved in this turd. lets hope the new bond movie isnt anything like this toilet deposit

7.5 out of 10 for clarification. Despite being inferior to the magnificent original, T2 doesn't fall short of the same level of quality by a horrific margin. In fact, T2 is accomplished in a number of areas. Fr example, it hosts incredible performances, respectable cinematography and a handful of memorable scenes.It's just a colossal shame that T2 fails to reach the virtually inscrutable level of excellently crafted dialogue and accompanying soundtrack of the original. Similarly, none of the standout scenes in T2 match the highest quality scenes of the original. Despite it's flaws, T2 is a respectable sequel that disappointed me to a lower standard than I anticipated.

Okay the first film was good one. Then I thought it was unnecessary to make a sequel for it. But someone clarified that it was not made outside the novel to make money. It's indeed adapted from the sequel book of the original film's source. Though coming out 20 years later was the disadvantage. Except some praises it had received, particularly by its hardcore fans, it was average at the box office and I thought same as well. I did not like the story. It was just a random drag, not knowing what direction to head. That's until the third act, and once all the three main characters come together, so it gets interesting with something. Like surviving from from a revenge threat. It was the actors who saved the film. Otherwise, it is not even an average as I consider now. I don't think retaining the title was a good idea, but I think it was just for its fans. Or else, a new title name would have done a decent justice to what it had narrated. As I know, this is the director's first ever sequel and he's not getting better since his Oscar win, a decade ago. Especially the last two flicks, despite based on the very good subjects. Definitely no to the T3. Instead, I want another Oscar nod film from him. This would have been ever worse if somebody else would have made it. Yet, a watchable film, only if you had liked the first. So just think about it before going for it after seeing only positive words from a few people.

UK 2017 English (Colour); Drama (TriStar); 117 minutes (18 certificate)Crew includes: Danny Boyle (Director); John Hodge (Screenwriter, adapting Novels PORNO and TRAINSPOTTING by Irvine Welsh); Andrew Macdonald, Danny Boyle, Christian Colson, Bernard Bellow (Producers)Cast includes: Ewan McGregor, Ewen Bremner, Jonny Lee Miller, Robert Carlisle, Kelly Macdonald, Anjela NedyalkovaA former addict (McGregor) returns to Edinburgh after 20 years to be reunited with his three junkie ex-mates (suicidal Bremner, blackmailing Miller, psycho jailbird Carlisle), and tries to make amends for betraying them back then.Long-time-in-coming sequel to 1996's cult hit is just about worthwhile; funny and repulsive in equal measure, and not for everyone.