I cannot think of one single thing that I would change about this film. The acting is incomparable, the directing deft, and the writing poignantly brilliant.

Ok... Let's be honest. It cannot be the best movie but is quite enjoyable. The movie has the potential to develop a great plot for future movies

A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

It's a feast for the eyes. But what really makes this dramedy work is the acting.

This one is better than one would guess it to be... can be funny at times, scary at other times - makes for good horror entertainment.There are some good actors in this movie - the two that play real jerks in the film: Clancy Brown as Gus and Jared Rushton as Clyde and do a real good job at getting you to hate their jerky characters!! Very good performances. As for the rest of the cast: Good performances again!! I'm very happy with all of the actor's skills in the film! The story is what's slacking just a wee bit from the original film but I do find this film entertaining!! It's fun to watch! I pulled out a few films tonight and let my kitten touch the one film to watch this afternoon... this is film she touched with her paw so it's the one we watched first today. I laughed when the first scary music came out of the speakers because she ran up my belly and hugged up against my neck! I knew we'd have fun watching this one together and it was very delightful!! 7/10

Yes, after 'Terminator 2' it seemed that Edward Furlong was going to be the next 'big thing' in Hollywood. Unfortunately, due to his own personal demons, that never happened and he's remembered more as someone who could have had it all, rather than an A-list actor. However, before he went off the rails, he made 'Pet Sematary 2' and it's not that bad (especially for a sequel).The original 'Pet Sematary' was based on Stephen King's book of the same name and was a pretty dark and bleak little affair. The sequel's tone does its best to follow that, but does tend to succumb to a few clichés which do bring it down a bit. Edward Furlong and his dad move to the same town where an old Indian burial ground brings anything interred there back from the dead (with the only drawback being that they're borderline psychotic and largely lethal). Before long, circumstances spin out of control and every man and his dog is being buried there... and therefore coming back ready to murder anyone that stands in their path.It's no classic, but there are a few quite creepy scenes (even if you can tell it's just someone in a monster mask, it's shot well enough to be a bit disturbing). Also, Clancy Brown does stand out as pretty damn nuts as the local lawman.It's not as good as the first, as it's not as bleak, plus I mentioned the clichés – i.e. new family in a town, meets bullies at school and so on. However, based on the fact that most sequels to horror films are largely not even worth putting on, this one is actually pretty good.

not very inspired, not a really horror but interesting for the admirers of Edward Furlong . because it is only an exercise to use the Stephen King novel for a movie far by book but using tools of horror for decent audience. the result - not only bad but real strange , confuse and, for many scenes, amusing. only sin - the title because it is too far by the original adaptation and the manner to use the story is not the best. but it is not an exception. only one of many adaptations who looking easy success exploring a good beginning point in chaotic manner. a film about nothing . but, maybe, that is its virtue. a young Furlong, Anthony Edwards in a sketch of role and violence. but the bitter taste remains.

OK now i know that a lot of people hated this movie but i thought it was good i prefer to watch this one compared to the original one if i am honest. Anyway acting could have been better storyline was more or less kind of the same (people and animals die are buried then come back)the movie does flaw in places but then again no movie is perfect. I also found that this one was easier to follow than the first one was so with that being said i would rate this movie a 7 out of 10. And apparently i have to write 3 more lines ummm cant really think of anything to say but i think that its pretty stupid you should just be able to write what you want then post in instead of having to drag it out for 10 lines.