I gave this film a 9 out of 10, because it was exactly what I expected it to be.

In other words,this film is a surreal ride.

A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.

I'm giving this a pretty high score even though it's not the easiest to sit through. I just have too much respect for how it came across to me. Passion deserves to be talked about outside the niche within a niche of Sondheim fans. People who have seen this musical are likely to be repulsed, mainly because of the behavior of Fosca. Audiences shouted mean comments at the stage during preview performances! Why? Let's analyze the story.Giorgio, a green young man sent off to war, meets Fosca while stationed in a remote town. Fosca appears to suffer from mental illness, chronic physical illness, and eating disorders. Giorgio is the only person in the whole story who tries to know Fosca on her own terms and listen to her; no one finds her physically attractive. You can guess that she falls in love with Giorgio, but he is already involved with Clara, a married woman. Fosca is upfront, desperate and nosy about Giorgio and Clara. Giorgio is quick to call her out on it, insisting that her appearance is no excuse for her behavior. The trouble is, Fosca doesn't have anyone, and did I mention the self-esteem issues? We learn in a flashback that she was deceived by a suitor and brought up by her parents to believe that a woman's only value is in her beauty. Given what her life is like, I'd humor her a little more if I were Giorgio.Here's the thing: Giorgio denounces Fosca's infatuation as shallow and unreasonable, but his relationship with Clara is just that. We don't learn why he started seeing Clara. When we see Giorgio and Clara together, they do little other than make out, but in the bulk of his scenes with Fosca, he's talking and thinking with her. Fosca is more of an intellectual, being a reader and pianist, while Clara gives Giorgio permission to ignore her without having met her; unaware that no one sympathizes with Fosca a) because of her appearance, and b) from a lack of understanding of her medical condition!As you can tell, this is a thinker's piece. Passion is difficult to swallow, but it raises important questions. For one, where do we draw the line between pardoning antisocial behavior due to past suffering and total accountability? Is Fosca so defeated by society that there's no way she can't passive-aggressively harass the objects of her desire? (I say yes.) One could argue about this play endlessly, and to me, that is when you know a piece of writing or art has done its job.

Passion is not for everybody and it will test the patience of some. It still however has Sondheim's beautiful music and intelligent lyrics, and the story is poignant once you stick with it. And this is an incredible performance, if you love Passion(I myself think that while it's not Sondheim's best that it's misunderstood) you'll find much pleasure in the performance. The production is transferred to DVD beautifully, sharp, fluid and clear, has simple but effective sets and costumes and it's a cleverly lit production also. With the way the orchestra play Sondheim's music positively sweeps, and the tempos are all appropriate to the moods each song is conveying. The drama and what's happening on stage is genuinely poignant and once you stick with the production and the musical itself you'll be drawn in. Fosca is also very easy to identify with. And that is mainly because of the unforgettable performance of Donna Murphy, a powerful and moving performance if there ever was one, she doesn't just perform Fosca, she becomes Fosca. Marin Mazzie is superb as well, beautiful voice and compelling acting complete with personal beauty and charm. Jere Shea has a great voice and is heartfelt towards the end, but his acting is rather wooden most of the time. That's the only speck of a criticism to be had with the production though. In conclusion, patience-testing on first viewing but stick with it and once you get past Shea's acting this is an incredible performance of an underrated Sondheim. To be seen especially for Murphy, who gives the performance-of-a-lifetime, and probably has not been better than here. 9.5/10 Bethany Cox

This has to be Sondheim's weakest work (with the possible exception of his last work, which I have never heard). As with most of his musicals, it suffers from a poor book (in fact, I think 'Forum' may be the only musical he wrote with a good book). But usually his work is saved by the wonderful music and lyrics. In this case both are dull, unimaginative, and even repetitive. Why on earth does he always take the worst material and try to turn it into a musical? In the past, it was crap like 'Merrily, We Roll Along' and 'Sweeney Todd'. He even managed to take one of the greatest films ever made, Smiles of Summer Night, and turned it into a trite, hackneyed, predictable story. But there we can blame the book writer for not staying true to the original material. Here he takes what was originally a highly mediocre Italian film and tries to turn it into something interesting. Well, he and Lapine once again failed at that. As to the performances, well they are all equally dull and uninteresting. Donna Murphy, in fact, belies the fragility of her character by belting out songs that could knock the walls off the theater. To say this is incongruous would be redundant. Jere Shea is just plain dull, and not very attractive. The rest of the cast is just plain dull. The direction, staging, costumes, lighting, etc. are all unimaginative. Hopefully this entire piece will just disappear from Sondheim's canon.

For some reason there's no credit given here for the 1981 Italian film this musical is based on - Ruggero Maccari and Ettore Scola's "Passione d'amore" - which, in turn, was based on the novel "Fosca" by Iginio Ugo Tarchetti. All versions are well worth checking out! :)