Why so much hype?

Let's be realistic.

It's a good bad... and worth a popcorn matinée. While it's easy to lament what could have been...

The movie really just wants to entertain people.

I have been waiting since 2003 for a new Jeepers Creepers. I remember having the crap scared out of me while watching the first one as a kid. At the beginning I thought, " Alrighty 23 years have passed, he's alive again" .. but then I remembered how the second movie ended, him tied up in someone's barn. He now roars and is able to lift up cars, way to go bat man creature. That car harpoon can go really far and fast to catch someone on a motocross, that was when i stopped believing this movie was serious. The effects were total crap, hello green screens ! I have no idea what happened at the " We know what you are moment" close to the end, other than his 23 days were up. It ends with Trish Jenner wanting revenge for her brother ( who died in the first movie ) in another 23 years.. it could have been a good idea except technically this movie is based 46 years after his death and she should be atleast 60 years old, not 30 which is what she looks like. She would have to wait another 23 years. We're looking at 69 years after the death of her brother, she should be approx 90 years old in the next one. Sooooo disappointed

The whole movie was a big waiste of time and the fact that the creeper did not look as realistic in the 1st and 2nd movie this creeper in the 3rd looked like rubber and the movie is so clesay and the there is too much CGI and it was terrible.

This film was ok-ish as a film on its own, but not as a sequel, as all the rules from the original were thrown overboard. This installment was not scary at all and the make-up was also not as good. Also, the Creeper seems to prefer to roam during the day - why? He has interesting new gadgets, but I'm just wondering if the idea of a predator who comes to feed every 23 years and being this innovative is really credible? Why doesn't he just hunt like a predator? Like he does in the first two movies. Is he moving with the times, as well? This fact - and the fact that he hunts during the day - makes him that much less scary. The film is not entirely bad, but also not entirely memorable. There are some great action scenes towards the end, though.

Just another example of Hollywood taking a perfectly good story line and destroying it with the third movie. They didn't follow the story line from the last two. They made their own story and it's more of a poor reboot rather than a 3rd