Good start, but then it gets ruined

Fantastic!

Boring, long, and too preachy.

It's not great by any means, but it's a pretty good movie that didn't leave me filled with regret for investing time in it.

It's 1579 London. After 20 years on the throne, Elizabeth I (Helen Mirren) still refuses to marry. The men of the court plot to get her married for political advantage. She and the Earl of Leicester (Jeremy Irons) have feelings for each other. They await the Spanish Armada with his stepson Earl of Essex (Hugh Dancy). After Leicester's death, Elizabeth takes Essex as her new lover. Essex has a rival in the Privy Council in Robert Cecil (Toby Jones).Helen Mirren is beyond masterful. The great thing is how human the queen is in this version. This is filled with great actors. It's a smaller scale TV miniseries. The first part is interesting that ends with the Spanish Armada. The second part is even better. It's darker and more fascinating. This is a much performed character but Mirren still brings it.

Another version of the story of Elizabeth I may have been redundant, but Helen Mirren is really exceptional as the ageing queen trapped by her own stature in life, unable to love or be loved as anyone else unshackled by monarchy could be.Slightly different in story to other versions, this has Leicester throughout the first episode (which also introduces Essex), and then the second episode concentrates on the ruthless ambition of the Earl of Essex, the late favourite of Elizabeth's in old age.Beautifully shot and well-scripted, and with good supporting performances from the likes of Patrick Malahide and Toby Jones, this Elizabeth isn't a dark political thriller like Cate Blanchett's first appearance in the role, or detached from emotion like Glenda Jackson's classic TV performance. Mirren's Elizabeth is almost woman first and queen second.

Being an aspiring historian i love nothing more then to sit and enjoy a historical drama / film. I hold a huge interest in Elizabethan England (Or English history in general really)and the Kings and Queens of the past, most especially one of our best loved monarchs -Queen Elizabeth 1. However, although being only 16, i am not so naive as to believe that the content of this film was entirely factual,however, i Thoroughly enjoyed it - in fact LOVED it! and am currently trying to purchase it on DVD. And may i just add that Hugh Dancy is a suburb actor and extremely dishy!! :P Having seen the adaptation with Cate Blanchett in, but did not feel as connected to character as with Helen's portrayal. I felt Helen Mirren brought more emotion to the character and gave an added human touch to the Queen. I am a big fan of Jeremy Irons and think he portrayed the Earl of Leciester with his usual brilliance . All in all, i have not in the 16 years of my life, seen a Drama / film that i have fallen in love with so greatly, i can not say how worth a watch it is - watch it and see. I highly recommend this film - no questions!

There is some sort of mass hysteria going on here. I think people have been fooled into believe that Elizabeth I, is deep. Here as on Masterpiece Theatre, expensive costumes and flash photography do not a "masterpiece" make.Mirren's "Bess" is a good one basically. She does swing well into the part, playing Elizabeth as a lusty CEO. Through 80% of the film this characterization works. But, when her character is emphatic in her darker emotions, Mirren is really over-the-top overwrought. And it reminds me of Mel Blanc, doing such things in the guise of many characters he voiced in Warner Brothers cartoons. I am actually embarrassed for her.Some of the blame for this poor acting must be shared with the script writers. There is an old axiom in screen writing that you can not just have the actors stand about and shout out their emotions. I am angry! I am anguished by your betrayal! You have to have clever dialogue to weave the fabric of the story for the audience.Elizabeth l commits the sin of having Mirren, and others, shout out their feelings. And it happens many times throughout the series.There is also the small matter( to some) of the very large liberties taken by the film with historical fact. They are numerous and at times completely at odds with the woman and her times.Elizabeth l is designed to be smutty, emphasizing Bess' odd, conflicting libido. I doubt that she and Leicester, or Essex, ever petted each other in public, let alone at a mass ceremony for the people.The Earl Of Leicester died at his house in Oxfordshire. Bess was no where close. and certainly not in bed with him. Essex, a shallow man, was no great fan of his step father, and was not there at his deathbed either.There are more and they pollute the truly fascinating story of one of history's most remarkable monarchs