Awesome Movie

A waste of 90 minutes of my life

A different way of telling a story

The movie's not perfect, but it sticks the landing of its message. It was engaging - thrilling at times - and I personally thought it was a great time.

I was in great two when the Princess passed away..I' ll give the movie 6 stars and 1+ for Princess Diana.Talking about the movie, This movies is blessed with such a adorable biography.Everyone loves Diana, It is not an exaggeration to say she is the only one ever lived on this Earth to received love and attention from almost everyone of the Earth. But digging into the deep of her own soul, it questioned her love hunger soul, the women's lives inside the princess. Diana does dishes, laundries for her lover, Go out and romancing like a teenager, appreciate and admire her man's work. In fact, it is noble humbleness of noble women. The movie shines light on such details melt people's hearts with love, teach the world the power of love.Naomi Watts doing enough justice for her role and bringing out what the essence of the move,pure heartiest love.The appearance of Hasnat's mother, it is bit of a obstruct and conventional barrier. Yet Diana's smile compete it all. This movie as a cinematic work,could have been more sharp and shrewd but powerful biography of Diana overshadows all the late back points and make every second of the movie touched. Finally this is a must to watch Biographical movie" Someone where beyond right and wrong,there is a gardenI ll meet you there"

Fatigued dramatization of Princess Diana's complicated love life in the final years before her untimely death in a Paris car accident in 1997. Stephen Jeffreys' screenplay (inspired by Kate Snell's book, "Diana: Her Last Love"), asserts that Diana was on the rebound from a broken love affair with a Pakistani heart surgeon when she died, and was using Dodi Fayed (who was killed alongside her) to stir up publicity and perhaps a bit of jealousy. As seen from a distance playing the piano, or filmed from behind getting out of cars or walking down corridors, Naomi Watts bears a passing resemblance to Diana (her coif is the only thing which will evoke memories of the ill-fated Princess, and even this isn't very convincing when seen in close-up). It isn't necessarily Watts' fault--she gives the part a noble try--but no modern actress should be expected to walk in Diana's shoes and pull off a feat of magic (even the real Princess of Wales found the role difficult to play!). Perhaps it's too soon to reenact this sad bit of history. In any case, the attempt is both crass and pointless, with the jet-setting locales and elaborate camera set-ups only adding to the discomforting feeling of wasted money, effort and time. ** from ****

Despite the film receiving negative reviews in the media, I actually thought it was quite good. The message I got from the film that those who were closest to Diana, had let her down. I felt very sad for her. She wasn't perfect but she was very good at using her strength of building relationships with people, to her advantage. I think Naomi Watts portrayed her very respectfully and I was glad that the film didn't have scenes of Diana overeating or throwing herself down the stairs.Overall, the film was not as bad as what I had anticipated. It was a story about a real person.

I saw the DVD having heard about the negative reviews first. I wasn't disappointed except I felt Naomi didn't suit or play Diana well.I have seen other actresses do a better job. In style (Naomi lacked class) her voice, (Diana had a whining upper class defensive tone) and physically, the high buttocks were not Diana's who was tall(5ft 9 without heels, she was as tall as Charles and taller with heels) and slender other than having larger breasts. Most know now the so called affair and engagement (if there ever was one?) with Dodi was a set up by the father Mohammed who really was the one who should be blamed for the accident. In fact the two went along with it to suit Diana's spurned love affair with Hasnat Khan, whose family would not accept Diana and it is doubtful he wanted marriage to her either. Dodi was engaged at the time, but he went along with anything his father demanded. But one thing the film did get right, that Diana did arrange the last meeting, and media coverage and let the press know; posed deliberately kissing Dodi,and sitting forlorn on the diving board. It was just to anger Hasnat for his refusal to marry her and didn't like the publicity he was getting. (His fault too perhaps what did expect sleeping with one of the most beautiful and famous women in the world) The resignation of her long standing secretary when he didn't know about the BBC interview. The worst thing she could have done as it showed her up as an adulteress too!(The film omitted that part of the interview) She had gone through several men by then, caused one divorce, and was bitter regarding Camilla. Forgetting to mention the affair with the English guards officer who she used too, while still legally married to Charles and that Harry bears a remarkable resemblance to him. And his uncle mind you? Everyone blamed her death and Dodi on the Royal family and their treatment of her, including a conspiracy to kill her, that Mohammed pushed to extremes insisting on a public inquest. That showed him up for the man he was, bitter and hating Prince Phillip and the British government who refused him British citizenship. He was the one who instrumented the Dodi and Diana affair and alleged engagement. Diana was then a loose cannon, wanted love and the company of a man, unfortunately she was rotten picking them and world notice regarding the land mine problem.I don't think the film did her memory any favors, but in someways it did show up that she wasn't all innocent especially her childish and immature handling of the press and relationship with Dodi. To get back at Khan, not so Charles and Camilla. (Whose relationship later was put on hold after her death). As far as Mr Khan is concerned, he did marry a Muslim woman, they separated and who knows where he is now, back home in Pakistan?