Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Admirable film.

A Brilliant Conflict

The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

I demand the creation of a federal law enforcement agency to handle the new criminal scourge of the 21st century. It could be called the BFC - Bureau of Fraudulent Cinema - and its mission would be to investigate, arrest and prosecute those responsible for passing off sub-amateurish dreck like Dead Noon as legitimate filmmaking. There's a lot of low budget flicks out there, including some of the most dirt poor ones, that are actually worth watching. It's hard enough to ferret them out from the mountain of cheaply made crap, but then you've got movies like this that don't even qualify as crap. Someone has got to stop this kind of deceitful product from polluting the marketplace.Let me be clear, I'm not blaming the people who made this movie. They do appear to be poltroons who are bereft of talent and without an inkling of self-awareness, but everybody has dreams and you can't punish deluded dullards just because they aspire to be Hollywood stars. No, I'm talking about the people who took the dreadful work of co-writer/director Andrew Wiest and company, burned it onto DVDs and distributed it across the country, hoping that unsuspecting saps would plop down their hard earned money on Dead Noon in the vain hope of being entertained. That's because no sober, unmedicated individual could possibly be entertained by this fiasco and those responsible for unleashing it on the public had to know that. This movie isn't a failure or a mistake. It's a deliberate effort to trick people out of their money.I can confidently allege that because there are two different types of filmmaking on display here. There's the original footage shot by Wiest that is…just…awful. Then there are several scenes obviously shot long after the original production, starring horror legend Kane Hodder and used as framing devices for the rest of the film. The stuff with Hodder has production values, camera work and even writing that is clearly superior to the other footage. It's not good, but it is the product of marginally competent professionals. The original scenes look like they were made by some high school film nerds who used the Christmas money from their grandmas to rent some equipment and hire the staff from a local Applebee's to be their cast and crew.I mean, the lead actor here has such a limited range of expression it appears he celebrated getting this part by having botox injected into his entire face. The internal logic of the plot is so twisted, contradictory and nonsensical that it would make Mr. Spock's head explode. The visual storytelling for 99% of Dead Noon is so remedial that it would make the average episode of Romper Room look like it was directed by David Lynch. Then, for no apparent reason, it digresses for a few minutes into some pretentious, avant garde, film school dropout fantasy sequence that cannot possibly have been made by the same person who directed the rest of it. And yes, I know how much the Romper Room reference dates me.Between director Wiest's weird reloading fetish, computer special effects that are just as bad as the real world FX you would have seen in a 1950s drive-in theater and moments of dialog that sound like they were written by someone with Asperger's Syndrome, the original footage is unwatchable to anyone except the friends and family of the people who made it. But somebody took that video, packaged it with the Scorsese-like in comparison scenes with Hodder and willfully tried to fool people into renting or buying a copy of Dead Noon.I'm not being snarky or sarcastic when I say there should be a law against movies like this. I know it's neither practical nor Constitutional, but inflicting Dead Noon on innocent viewers should merit incarceration or, at least, community service. Maybe we could bring back the stocks and have those who produced and distributed the DVDs spend a few weekends having rotten fruit thrown at them. Failing that, don't ever watch this film or let anyone you know watch it. Even your worst enemy deserves better.

I put this on expecting to turn it off after ten or twenty minutes but was engaged enough to watch it to the end.It's not brilliant but it is fun, some of the other criticisms are unfair but some accurate, the director has been far too ambitious as evidenced by too many cheap looking FX shots (that said some are pretty good) and action sequences.Given the obvious source material of High Noon I think sticking closer to that story line and racking up the tension with less reliance on dynamic scenes would have been better. This of course would have required half decent acting which for the most part was pretty ropey, but the three leads are competent particularly Elizabeth Mouton.Criticisms aside this film is better than many films a hundred or even a thousand times the budget and wouldn't look out of place on late night TV.All in all a good effort.

Dead Noon pretty much fails due to high goals of the director and a low budget that ruins a lot of the effects in this mix of horror and western elements. The opening is OK although the low budget is obvious in most shots. I have to credit the makers of the movie for still squeezing a lot out of their tight budget because some of the FX work pretty good, so when the first Zombie-Cowboys appeared it was still OK, although the ridiculous amount of shoot-outs and hunts with barely any dialog soon gets hard to bear and makes little sense. But when then skeleton armies appear, puppets are flying from cliffs, the stiff acting of many actors kills the plot which is pretty hard to stay focused on while being distracted by people running through abandoned cities and shooting with obvious stock-FX flares. Some scenes like most including the main "good guy" (who is really a bad cast for this role) for his stiff acting or the ridiculous fight scenes are hard to watch. While there was some decent parts the movie failed to build up tension or unfold the story in an interesting way. So its not just the effects and acting which make Dead Noon tank. Many parts are plain boring although there is permanent running and shooting. But its so repetitive and meaningless that you soon stop to care.

This is movie is a blast! It's "High Noon" done as a horror western. Some bandits return to take vengeance on a sheriff, who recently married and stays to protect the town rather than run away with his wife. The difference is, these bandits were killed by the sheriff's ancestor over a hundred years ago. And they've been released not from prison, but from hell and begin destroying the town.I saw this film at the "Tabloid Witch Awards Film Festival" last year. It was there I learned they made this film for $4,000.00. Which still amazes me. This does not look or feel like a four thousand dollar film at all. It's full of action and gun fighting. And some wicked special effects considering the budget. I recently saw the version which LionsGate bought and is releasing. I must say, I liked the original better. The music was much more dirty and gritty. And the story flowed a little better. The cute blonde (Lillith Fields of Urban Legends: Bloody Mary) was in it much more (including a shower scene). There was also a lot more comedic moments. I guess a studio's gotta do, what a studio's gotta do. BUT, the LionsGate/Barnholtz version still has a hell of a bite and they added one great element to it. KANE HODDER (Jason Voorhees of Friday the 13th)! It was so nice to see Kane rocking some dialogue and looking like his extremely intimidating self. I'm very happy to see this film got picked up and distributed. It'd be great to see more indies out there to freshen' up the film world. Once again gotta say, for a $4,000.00 dollar film, this one knocked my socks off!