Load of rubbish!!

This movie was so-so. It had it's moments, but wasn't the greatest.

Easily the biggest piece of Right wing non sense propaganda I ever saw.

The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

Another cheap straight-to-video sequel to Darkman, This time Darkman finds himself up against drug lord Jeff Fahey, all the while developing feelings for Fahey's mistreated wife. Cheesy dialogue, terrible acting, poor action and effects. Vosloo continues to unimpress as a replacement for Liam Neeson. Fahey is a weak substitute for the hammy Larry Drake from the previous two films. Filmed back-to-back with Darkman 2. As with that mess, this has none of the creativity or craftsmanship of Sam Raimi's Darkman. The writing is truly terrible. Some of the lines will make you wince with embarrassment for the poor actors who have to speak them. The title is appropriate because this was the death of Darkman as a viable movie franchise.

Bradford May once again directs this third(and last?) installment, again starring Arnold Vosloo as Peyton Westlake/Darkman, who gets mixed up with more gangsters after stealing their money to fund his continued experiments to perfect his synthetic skin grafts. The gang leader(played by Jeff Fahey) decides to set a trap for Darkman in order to study his superpowers, and use them to become even more powerful and rich. Darkman must defeat this gang, and complete his journey once and for all.Filmed at the same time as Part II, sequel is no better or worse, since the plot and story elements are so familiar. Not very credible either, with an inconclusive ending, though it has yet to be continued...

There is only one Liam Neeson and I'm not asking Arnold Vosloo to deliver a performance as good as Neeson because I know he can't but I do expect a performance that isn't wooden,stale and with zero charisma. Vosloo is practically reading cue cards for the bulk of the film! Darkman worked because Peyton Westlake was such an interesting character and here all of the life the character had is pretty much stripped away. Die Darkman Die works somewhat despite Vosloo being horribly miscast. We have one character horribly miscast and one character perfectly cast,Jeff Fahey is outstanding as Peter Rooker.Like Vosloo Bradford May has very large boots to fill but he exceeded my expectations. Die Darkman Die is very Raimi like and we get some outstanding visuals for a DTV movie. The Make up effects here are even better than they were in the original Darkman.I really think that if Vosloo was not Westlake I would have enjoyed the film a lot more,everything else works in the film but him.

The first Darkman movie was awesome. The 2nd was stupid. Durant comes back from the dead to torment Darkman once more, please. If you're in the kind of chopper crash he was in, you're dead and you stay dead.This sequel however was pretty good. Darkman is tricked by a doctor into allowing a procedure to reconnect his nervous system, but instead it's connected to some kind of electric shock device. She uses it on him if he doesn't obey her.Darkman's skin formula and diskette the forumula's on are stolen by the doctor's boyfriend Rooker. Darkman has to try to get them back, but while he's doing this, ends up falling in love with Rooker's emotionally battered wife and child.The movie would've been better if it wasn't done on a shoe string budget with lowgrade special effects (like garbage cans sailing into the air when they explode, please). But it's still a step up from the 2nd movie.