Survivor
Survivor
TV-PG | 31 May 2000 (USA)
SEASON & EPISODES
  • 46
  • 45
  • 44
  • 43
  • 42
  • 41
  • 40
  • 39
  • 38
  • 37
  • 36
  • 35
  • 34
  • 33
  • 32
  • 31
  • 30
  • 29
  • 28
  • 27
  • 26
  • 25
  • 24
  • 23
  • 22
  • 21
  • 20
  • 19
  • 18
  • 17
  • 16
  • 15
  • 14
  • 13
  • 12
  • 11
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • Reviews
    Hellen

    I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

    ... View More
    Platicsco

    Good story, Not enough for a whole film

    ... View More
    RipDelight

    This is a tender, generous movie that likes its characters and presents them as real people, full of flaws and strengths.

    ... View More
    Philippa

    All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

    ... View More
    shirgam

    I'm a tv buff who watches all sorts of tv shows some are better then other , but every time a new season of survivor is on there's an excitement in the air, and when the season ends i always say " this is the best show ever " i love it more then all the rest..

    ... View More
    intrepidami

    This latest episode was TOTALLY supposed to make people think PATRICK, the giant ginger was going to get voted off. Everything the whole episode was about him being a pain in the ass, loud, crazy, annoying. Probsts questions at tribal were STEERING this. Most discussion were about voting him off.So as a seasoned viewer used to seeing this over the years, you could bet the house the girl was going home instead! We're supposed to think this was a big blindside or something? The girl was about as useful as a poopy flavored lollipop.They're NEVER going to get rid of a useful idiot early, it's too entertaining to watch! The more outlandishly foolhardy you act, the longer you go.So fake and horribly acted you might as well watch cartoons, they're more real.

    ... View More
    calvinnme

    ...or at least the end of television as we once knew it. It was all such a simple yet diabolical plan. Get a group of random people together, divide them into two "tribes" and pit each of them against each other, collectively and individually for a great sum of money. Maybe they were eccentric and weird before, maybe not. But tell them one hundred million people are watching and they WILL become eccentric and weird so they can claim their 15 minutes of fame as well as all of the money.The awful truth is people will lie, cheat, and steal when you give them a great enough reward (the cash) with great enough hardships - no shelter, not enough food, harsh weather. This ain't Gilligan's Island my friends.I've told you how this was such a simple plan. Now I will tell you how it was diabolical. It destroyed television as we had known it since its inception. It got huge ratings, partly because of the spectacle, partly because the audience became attached to "the islanders", and partly because people could feel better about themselves because each of us felt we would never sink so low.Networks figured out that no longer do you need paid actors or writers or art design. Just find some random group of awful people in normal situations or normal people in awful situations and watch the feeding frenzy. And then it spread from the networks to cable. A&E, which once aired "Breakfast with the Arts" now shows stuff like Duck Dynasty, Dog The Bounty Hunter, and Hoarders. The Discovery Channel? Gone was investigative reporter Bill Kurtis and Walking With Dinosaurs, in with "Naked and Afraid" and "Moonshiners".As for soap operas? Not exactly the apex of quality television, yet a guilty pleasure for quite a few, even myself in my college years. But it was scripted and required paid actors. Why pay Susan Lucci to act like a hideous human being into her 60's on "All My Children" when you can get some Bridezilla to act like a rutting pig for free? So one by one the soap operas fell, until only a handful still exist.Why my rating of 4? I'd give it a 10 for being a milestone in television history, although it's a bad milestone. I give it a one for having any redeeming value whatsoever. I'll give it another one for influencing television for the worse - it's an absolute miracle that something as good and as original as Big Bang Theory could take root and thrive in this environment. 12/3 = 4 which is my rating.Coming soon - my review of "Walking Dead", where Survivor finally becomes scripted.

    ... View More
    The Grand Master

    The first Survivor series has a lot going for it and was somewhat enjoyable. Every series after that was just repetitive and uninteresting. From there I vowed to stop watching the show and I have never watched Survivor since.Every time a new series of Survivor rolls around, I groan. Seriously, how much longer can this crap continue on? Surely they must be scrapping the bottom of the barrel by now. You would think that they would be running out of ideas by now but it appears they haven't. Yet it still has a loyal legion of fans which has stuck by the show since 2000.Survivor is right up there with Big Brother as one of the long running shows that I look forward to seeing the show end someday.The tribe has spoken...1/10.

    ... View More