Monroe
Monroe
TV-14 | 10 March 2011 (USA)
SEASON & EPISODES
  • 2
  • 1
  • Reviews
    Stometer

    Save your money for something good and enjoyable

    ... View More
    Lumsdal

    Good , But It Is Overrated By Some

    ... View More
    ShangLuda

    Admirable film.

    ... View More
    Matrixiole

    Simple and well acted, it has tension enough to knot the stomach.

    ... View More
    ortizjanat

    Very engaging medical series. The cast plays an assortment of characters destinctive and interesting. The drama of the serious medical issues is reflected by patients and surgeons as they have to deal with their role in each crisis. The personal lives of the doctors and staff fill in the drama outside of the operating rooms. Good acting and writing have so far prevailed. Hope there is more than one season.

    ... View More
    mauvehaze63

    I grew up in NZ on British humour. This is also shared by many Australians.Monroe is full of UK humour and idioms, the "Stiff upper lip" etc. I thoroughly enjoyed it. This is not a UK version of House, it is totally different. Other cultures often have difficulty with this type of humour and it's "Lost in translation". Man About the House, a British sitcom was remade in the United States as Three's Company; Also, The Ropers (US), based upon Robin's Nest (UK) and George & Mildred (UK), respectively all lost the British humour to replaced by a much different US humour.Note my spelling :-)

    ... View More
    TheLittleSongbird

    I agree it may be lacking a tad in subtlety and originality, and the characters are slightly clichéd, but man did I love Monroe. It was a compelling, well-acted and well-written series that also does well in conveying any complexities and difficulties in the profession. I too don't understand the House comparison, the only two similarities I can think of at the top of my head are that they are set in a hospital and that both characters are cynical, House more so. Monroe has high production values, sharp, smart and witty writing, good direction and story lines that while not exactly original are more than benefited by the way they're paced and constructed. Monroe has excellent acting too, James Nesbitt is absolutely brilliant as his cynical yet fun character, and while Sarah Parish's role is less showy she does an excellent job with it. In conclusion, a great series and well worth catching. 9/10 Bethany Cox

    ... View More
    mark-newman-1

    Hmmm... It's a (much needed, wink wink!) medical drama set in a hospital! The show is named after the 'brilliant' neurosurgeon who is a cynical, damaged but genius doctor who is constantly at odds with his colleagues and authority... Can YOU guess the name of the show? Well, you're wrong. It's called Monroe and it's an annoying copy of the US show House. But this time we have to endure an hour of a smug and antagonistic showoff who insists on telling everyone how good he is, rather than letting us find out for ourselves! If you can get past the awful British accents and the clichéd cast of supporting roles then you'll probably get stymied by the adolescent script and implausible story line...One junior doctor says this to her boss at the end of an exhausting operation... "Coo - where did you learn to suture so fast!" Plenty of other annoyances, too. One patient buys his wife fruit knowing that she hates fruit because Monroe thinks it'll save their relationship, lots of students humiliated by their 'fantastic' God-like masters, scores of people in immaculate white coats whizzing importantly by and of course there is the fast walking conversations with people appearing from corridors to join in the fun. It's more like a well choreographed Andrew Lloyd Webber production...It would be funny if it were a parody of House. It's rather sad that it isn't and that it actually got through the planning stages.

    ... View More