everything you have heard about this movie is true.

I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

One of those movie experiences that is so good it makes you realize you've been grading everything else on a curve.

An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

As soon as this show came out and I knew what it was about I knew I had to see it. I am a real crime lover and I love to dive into cases to see if I can solve them or notice other things that haven't been noticed before. I've watched the show completely 5 times and every single time I see new details. There is simply too much information to process in one watch. It's given me a lot to think about and I am still thinking about it every now and then, deciding what my opinion is. I am waiting impatiently on the new season!

Recommended to watch this documentary..excepting season 2 soon.But in my opinion he is not guilty..The evidence must hav been planted by other to frame Steven Avery...

Netflix really did the job on this one! This was an epic. I just finished episode 4 and I never realized I can be this excited about a documentary film....the last time I did was Breaking Bad. But it with all its glory, Breaking Bad is still fiction.No other words to say but just WATCH IT!

I have controversial feelings about this. When I watched the series I noticed they wanted to look like they present the case objectively, but I could still see they picked a side and there must be other things they didn't show. Reading the comments and articles now I know I was right.I think we can agree that the first episode was done well. The rest of it I'm not so sure. It played more on the dramatic, emotional side than the factual one. I really enjoyed it(that's why I rate it higher), but throughout the series I was like 70% sure he did not commit it and I'm pretty sure that number is 100% for most viewers from episode 4 at least. After reading some more about it now I would say it's 50-50, it's just one of those cases where I can't pick a side. Both stories told could have happened.Both of his defender lawyers looked like rational people, who actually cared about the truth. I thought this is like a reversed OJ case(innocent proved guilty, because police framed him as opposed to guilty proved innocent, because they say police framed him), but then I realized we, the viewers only have 10hours of knowledge from one perspective in a case very complicated. I don't think the jury trial is a good system, but nonetheless they spent more time listening to the case, has more insight than we do. But then again if you do a documentary showing every bit of detail that would take forever and most people wouldn't watch it through and wouldn't talk about it.As for the Brendan part I'm almost certain he didn't do it. It's ridiculous that you go to jail for the rest of your life just because your own statements. I mean let's be real here, the people talked kindly of this, but he was a very asocial, borderline retarded teenager. When I saw the video clip it reminded me of someone getting tortured who doesn't know anything and tries to figure out what he has to say to get out of the situation. Not someone who confesses horrible crimes to relieve it's soul from remorse. I hope he gets out eventually.