I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

How sad is this?

Excellent, Without a doubt!!

While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.

This is a movie my brother likes. I decided to sit down and watch this knowing full well of it's reputation here on IMDb. I have absolutely no idea of the Czech legend it was based on so I am not going to bring that up as a complaint.The plot is that a king dies and one of his three daughters ends up being queen. This one can also see the future (Why is this never explained?). She whores herself (There really is no better word for it) at a peasant who saved her life and gets him to become king once a war starts. Completely forgetting about the war (??????????????) the king starts ruling the country with an iron fist (Which when we see the only settings being caves, forests and peasant houses - yes even the castle looks exactly the same as a farm).So the plot is pretty disjointed (but it's not like Monster A-Go Go where you ask yourself if there was a plot to begin with) to the extent that I didn't really know what these people were doing or what they were aiming for. The King's goal (See! I don't even remember his name!) seems clear enough, grow as a country and crush his opposition. That was all I got for the movie in terms of goals.The next point. What were the character's names? I know Libuse but... That's all. I didn't know what any other person's name was. The 2 minute exposition at the beginning might have said them but of all the things we don't have to rely on THAT.Another thing the villain of this piece has to be one of the weakest villains in cinema. I mean, worse than Plan 9 From Outer Space. I know I can't take that back but it's true the villain in Plan 9 From Outer Space was stronger.Now onto the positives. The Acting was decent from some people, even if they are also forgettable. The Cinematography was not bad (even if they have about 4 locations). There was a small hint that they could have been trying something with the premise.So if you want to sit down and watch a historical drama with some kind of love relationship... watch the three hour cut of Arn instead. That had a plot, character development, DEVELOPMENT, good focus and when they changed it, they did it right. Go watch that instead.

Okay, I did research on the legend this film was based on before I wrote this review up. Can I say, if you want an accurate story to the legend, you will be disappointed. If, however, you just want a fantasy/period piece, I heavily recommend it.I think its time to tell you why I like it. I absolutely adore the cinematography. The shot compositions were near reminiscent of Werner Herzog. I am in no way comparing because Herzog will come out on top of this argument but still, I can certainly think of worse shot composition.I also think that the two leads (Libuse and Premysl) did a great job with their parts. At first I genuinely thought this would be some sort of Arn ripoff via including a relationship early on in the piece. I have read the Wikipedia article on the Libuse legend (I know, inaccurate) and she didn't know him until she sent the horse out, I do think this was for the better because it kind of explains why he becomes a "harsh king".There are a few things that I would call "wrong with this film", the most important one is sound. I have chastised movies for f*cking this up but thankfully for this film, I'm willing to forgive. The sound at a couple of times is out of synch and often soundtrack pieces just end out of nowhere. This is a major reason why its not higher up in terms of a rating.The ending has had a lot of criticism but I do feel it suits because it is reminiscent of what really happened among those times. I also feel as though the ending in itself was a harsh one to give the audience...and I actually love that.Overall, this is low budget, the director has no idea how to direct an action sequence and make it interesting or even believable for that matter, however if you are willing to forgive a few minor errors and just enjoy this film, you will.

I can't imagine anyone will ever make a better movie than this about the legendary founding of the city of Prague. That's right, Prague. Not Paris. Not London. Not Berlin. The Pagan Queen purports to tell the Dark Ages origins of Prague. Weirdly, though, it's not a foreign language film. It was made in the Czech Republic but everybody's speaking English, and largely unaccented English at that. This also isn't some trashy romp with topless chicks running around and a bunch of badly staged battle scenes that look like kids playing in the backyard with Nerf swords. There is some nudity and violence here but this is, more or less, a well intentioned effort at bringing a mythic page of Czech history to life and to his credit, co-writer/director Constantin Werner does a decent job of it.Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying this is a great movie or even a very good one. However, I have seen motion pictures so awful they would make you doubt the existence of a kind and loving God. The Pagan Queen has an above average cast, some very solid production values given its screamingly obvious budget limitations and is directed with a competent eye. The writing here is the weakest link, with a plot that should have dispensed with several side characters and their stories while imbuing either more realism or more imagination to it's main focus, but everything makes some kind of sense and I can admire the narrative ambition of the script. It feels like Werner clung a little to tightly to the legend when he should have concentrated on telling the best tale he could.Libuse (Winter Ave Zoli) is a seer in 700 AD central Europe. When her father dies, she is elevated to the council of her kingdom and proves herself so wise and inspiring a leader that she is named queen. As she is pressured to marry, she instead carries on a secret affair with a lowly plowman named Premysi (Csaba Lucas) and sets her people to mining the great wealth out of their land. A dispute between miners and farmers eventually escalates to the point where Libuse must take a husband to calm things down and she manipulates a marriage to Premysi, who proves to be a hard and ruthless king. Eventually, a childhood friend of Libuse's (Lea Mornar) raises an army of women warriors in rebellion against Premysi and becomes another bloody foundation stone in the great city that Libuse dreams and Premysi sets about to create. There's also a whole subplot about Libuse's sisters (Vera Filatova and Veronika Bellova) and how they symbolize the decline of the "old ways" and the rise of Christian modernity.Winter Ave Zoli is fine as Libuse, beautiful and capable of more depth than you might expect. Csaba Lucas gives a one note performance but hits that note exactly right. Lea Mornar is the standout here and gives real spirit to her part, though it's somewhat offset by her having an accent more pronounced than the rest of the cast put together. Frankly, there's no one on screen here that makes you think they got their role through some exchange of cash or sexual favors.While there's an amateurish edge to the script, Werner did quite a job of making a film that looks good with little spent. The costumes and props look nice and everything is lit well and sounds clear. The sets are largely forest clearings and what appears to be medieval tourist attractions rented out for a day or two, but The Pagan Queen looks like a legitimate film and not something high school kids did with their camera phones over spring break.With some romance, political intrigue, environmental moralizing and plenty of attractive actresses, The Pagan Queen is almost good enough to recommend. The story is just weak enough and the subject matter handled too demurely for that. What I can say is there's a lot of crap out there far worse than this movie. And if you've got a hankering to know the mysterious beginnings of Prague, you now know where to look.

This is a mythic tale combining legend and history, but above all it is a human drama. The Pagan Queen of the title is reputedly half Tree-elf and half human (there's a lovely myth about the girl's mother integral to the story), and her two sisters aren't fully human either, but the story doesn't directly revolve around their dual (magical or mythical) natures. Instead there is a strong message about Duality throughout the film; transitions; and balance in all things, especially human needs with nature. It's a great story and visually satisfying. Overall I really enjoyed it. One of the things I liked best about the film was that it avoided most of the clichés so inherent in this type of film. The relationships were believable and complex. Even the reactions and betrayals of the people against their beloved Queen felt real and made sense in the context of the story and the times.This is not a typical love story, and it's not your typical sword and sorcery flick. For anyone looking for lots of magic or swashbuckling sword play, you will be disappointed. The magic here is realistically spiritual and earth-based, not sparkling lights and instant fire spells. The film does a very good job of taking us back into the past and showing us what daily life and religious practices were probably really like in this time and place.Now that I know it is based on traditional Czech legends I understand why it seemed as if the movie was trying to truncate a much longer story. Much like "Lord of the Rings", if you don't know the whole tale, the movie can seem a bit disjointed. The lengthy synopsis (with spoilers) relates the legend as it was supposedly told in the movie, but it did not actually follow the movie itself. If you read that synopsis before viewing the movie you may be confused. On it's own, this movie never failed to entertain, but it did seem to struggle with timing. My biggest criticism may have had to do with the problems of making a Czech movie in English, in what surely was a second language for the actors and actresses. The main actress was lovely and the most believable, and I see a lot of promise in many of the leads, but the dialog sometimes suffered with awkward phrasing and the acting was occasionally flat--particularly the male lead.From what I read in the synopsis, this was a controversial film when it was in its theater release. I'm not sure why. Perhaps because of the way it characterized an important relationship as lesbian--at least on one side. Perhaps because it portrayed the pagan way of life as so much more inherently fair and idyllic compared to what followed. Perhaps because it was so honest in it's portrayal of people generally considered legendary or mythical. The people in this film are all too human.