Tied for the best movie I have ever seen

It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.

It's an amazing and heartbreaking story.

Great movie. Not sure what people expected but I found it highly entertaining.

Surly Squirrel (Will Arnett) and Andie (Katherine Heigl) are back with the rest of the gang and are troubled with an all important mission to accomplish. The evil and corrupt Mayor of Oakton City (Bobby Moynihan) has decided to bulldoze Liberty Park and build a self-serving, but dysfunctional, amusement park. The world is dangerous enough, but Surly and his animal friends need to make a shambles of the amusement park in order to defeat the Mayor and take back the park which is home sweet home. And believe it or not, a gang of Chinese rats from another part of town decide to join in the rescue operation. This is less tedious than watching a certain bunch of obnoxious chipmunks. The animation is well done and visual effects are vibrant. A fun watch for all ages.Other voices that make this NUT JOB come alive: Jackie Chan, Tom Kenny, Bobby Cannavale, Jeff Dunham, Isabela Moner, Peter Stormare, Kari Wahlgren and Maya Rudolph.

This film tells the story of a bunch of animals in a park, whose home is being destroyed by the mayor's decision to build a theme park on the park.The story is quite fun, and the animals are cute. Jackie Chan's character is funny as the leader of Chinatown mice. It will keep children entertained.

I'm writing this now, right after I saw the movie in the cinema. And boy, 1 hour and 35 minutes can feel really, really long. I hated, no, DESPISED this movie. Why?1. The characters where even more unlikable than in the first one. 2. The jokes where so unfunny it just was sad. 3. The story is so clishé I'm laughing. 4. "Hey look! A useless character! Hey look! Another one!"The only good thing about the movie is that the animation is decent.

C'mon, people. What are we doing? How did we, as the human race, get here? How is it that I, a 31-year-old with a full-time job, a community of friends, and a family, have to spend 3+ hours and 250 published words viewing and considering the value of The Nut Job 2? Why does this even exist? The first barely made an impression of any kind on the culture, yet because of our obsession with familiarity, a second is thrusted upon us like so many unwanted vermin. In this outing, the central group of small woodland creatures has to protect their park-home from a greedy Mayor's plans to turn it into a shoddy amusement park. It's technically a comedy, only the jokes are excruciatingly unfunny, and, as if we're sitting in a terrible sitcom writers' room, are constantly being explained to us. Arnett's squirrel "hero" Surly is still in the lead, continuing his bid for one of the worst protagonists in history; he's selfish, static, unfunny, whiny, and annoying. Jackie Chan joins the nonsense this time, begging the question: is there any better example of waste than only using Chan as a voice-actor? It's a careless mess, with little positive to write about. Sure, there are a couple of jokes that marginally work, and the incessant amount of obnoxious vehicle crashes and action sequences look fine for what they are. Honestly, this might actually be a bit better than the first, but so what? Certain Transformers films are better than others as well, but they're still all God-awful. Nut Job 2 is a humorless, soulless, angry and mean-spirited throwaway that you probably won't and definitely shouldn't see.