The Deal
The Deal
R | 20 November 2008 (USA)
The Deal Trailers

Charlie Berns is a veteran Hollywood movie producer who has given up on his career and life. That is until his idealistic screenwriter nephew comes bearing the script of a lifetime and Charlie decides to give his career one final shot. The only thing standing in his way is Diedre Hearn, a sharp-witted studio executive brought in to keep Charlie in line.

Reviews
Karry

Best movie of this year hands down!

... View More
Bea Swanson

This film is so real. It treats its characters with so much care and sensitivity.

... View More
Calum Hutton

It's a good bad... and worth a popcorn matinée. While it's easy to lament what could have been...

... View More
Juana

what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

... View More
pontifikator

Co-written by William H. Macy and Steven Schachter, this movie named "The Deal" was directed by Schacher and starred Macy as Charlie Berns, Meg Ryan as Deidre Hearn, and Jason Ritter as Lionel Travitz. It's a laugh-out-loud funny movie, but it has a few minor faults.The gist of the movie is that Charlie is a has-been producer who has hit the end of the line. His nephew Lionel stumbles in with a script. Charlie, having nothing to lose, pitches it to a studio as a vehicle for a black action star who has recently converted to Judaism and is looking for a property to promote his new Jewish ideals. The only problem is that the script is about Benjamin Disraeli, an 1800s English prime minister. (Disraeli was born into a Jewish family, but his father had him baptized as an Anglican when Disraeli was twelve.)Spoilers ahead. Here is one of my problems. Although Charlie is pitched by the script as a total loser, he out-maneuvers everyone with aplomb and total lack of effort and gets the film green lighted. He then finesses and finagles every problem thrown at him by Diedre, who loves the original script and detests the rewrite as an action film with Disraeli as a black action hero machinegunning Muslims to save a Torah and the girl. The process in "The Deal" is hilarious, I just had to suspend a wee bit too much disbelief. The script is based on Peter Lefcourt's novel of the same name, and a great deal of the film is spent skewering Hollywood types. Charlie sloughs off all responsibility, dumping all decisions on others in his relentless drive to get the film in the can. Roadblock after roadblock from self-promoting producers, legal, development, prima donna directors, prima donna actors, and studio heads are overcome or by-passed with a casual toss of the hand by Charlie. It was funny, very funny, but just not quite believable to me.The other problem is that the screenplay bolts a romantic comedy onto the darker comedy about Hollywood types. Meg Ryan's Diedre is in development, and she wants the original script produced. She attempts to hijack the movie, sabotage it, and get it back on track, in the process falling in love with Charlie. My major problem is that Charlie, shown as an unkempt, total loser with no class never really cleans up even when he's winning. In "Pretty Woman," Julia Roberts plays a street walker, for pete's sake, not even a call girl, but when Richard Gere gets her out of her slutty costume, she gets class.Charlie, alas, remains unclassy throughout. I guess my major complaint is that while Meg Ryan can do a respectable Myrna Loy, William H. Macy is no William Powell. Ever. Nothing in the script makes him bloom into a character worth Diedre's time. Macy has a winning smile, and the script has him playing it for all it's worth, but he's not my ideal romantic lead opposite Meg Ryan. The parts of the script where Charlie and Diedre bantered back and forth didn't sparkle for me.The movie hit the indie film contests and went straight to video. I enjoyed the movie a great deal despite its flaws, and I recommend it.I read the novel after I saw the movie. I recommend this because most books have depth and character missing from movies, but it's not necessary for Lefcourt's book. The book and movie are different enough to keep your interest, but there's no character development and no depth -- like the movie, not a problem. It's a funny book, but I suspect I missed a lot of inside humor since I don't know the goings on in Hollywood. The book was published in 1991, and it's dated because of references to the top stars of 20 years ago, but most people will catch the drift. Additionally, the relationship between Diedre and Charlie is more fully developed, has a satisfactory explanation, and suffers no attempts at romantic banter. With no description of Charlie offered by Lefcourt, he's left to my own imagination.One other plus for the book: I got a lot more out of the names for Lefcourt's characters. Emprin, Hudris, Fuchs, Ikon, Bland, Auger, and more I'm sure that went right over my head. It got off to a very slow start, but it soon had me turning pages with time going by unnoticed.

... View More
Oak Owl

Possible Spoilers?Not sure what this movie was about, and neither were the writers. It could have been an absurdist romp, ala The Producers - and it almost was. It could have been a commentary on the desperation of those trying to make it in Hollywood, and the estrangements and grief - but it only skirted along the edges of that. It could have been a romantic comedy. But it wasn't. Wm Macy is a truly excellent actor, to be sure - and Meg Ryan shows her acting chops here in a way that is surprising; the rest of the cast is good, too. No faults in that department.It is just ... boring. Nothing unexpected or particularly amusing happens. There is no suspense - we're all pretty sure we know how it's all going to turn out. And we're right. The "complication" of the relationship between the two principals is minor and will clearly be resolved. The plot is predictable from beginning to end, including the conclusion.Although the running time is reported to be 100 minutes it seemed MUCH longer. Disappointing.

... View More
jhunts5

My wife and I were excited about a movie that was supposed to bring laughs. I think that if I were almost completely inebriated and laughing at everything I still wouldn't have found this movie funny. The acting was horrid. The plot was --- was there one? Poor 'old' Megan Ryan looked like she was trying to act like she was still in Sleepless or Got Mail. We kept trying to watch it through to the end because we were sure it was going to get funny - as a matter of fact, that is what began to be funny. There was literally not one moment in this movie in which we laughed. And it isn't difficult to make us chuckle! Yikes! This will join other capital "L" DVDs in the waste basket. Maybe this movie is a reflection of real life in Hollywood? If that is the case then I am thankful that I am not in the business!

... View More
steve0557

Not funny huh... "Benjamin Disraeli? What happened to Tony Blair?" - "...she throws like a girl!!" - "Hey guys thanks much, you're fired, great input though" - "....colonel America" - "...if you circumcised this movie it still couldn't be Jewish." - "...that's Bobbie's trailer, that's his gym and that's his mobile temple." LL Cool J in a Yarmukuh over a Du Rag: Moderately hysterical. William H. Macy's bare butt: Hysterical. Meg Ryan's choices in footwear: Priceless. Especially when compared to some other so called romantic comedies I've seen recently I was pleasantly surprised and entertained by this movie. Besides, Elliott Gould can make me laugh by just reading the phone book.

... View More