The 7 Adventures of Sinbad
The 7 Adventures of Sinbad
PG-13 | 25 May 2010 (USA)
The 7 Adventures of Sinbad Trailers

Sinbad, the original Prince of Persia, must complete seven tasks in order to save the world from catastrophe.

Reviews
Arianna Moses

Let me be very fair here, this is not the best movie in my opinion. But, this movie is fun, it has purpose and is very enjoyable to watch.

... View More
Kien Navarro

Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.

... View More
Juana

what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

... View More
Isbel

A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

... View More
nkotbfan1234

I watched this film when it was released into the DVD world.I have been searching for this film for ages. I promise you, the graphics are unbearable, so bad, so terrible, I found myself laughing so hard, I was rolling on the floor.I originally thought this film was action. It turned into a comedy. The acting made me sick. Haha. But it is worth watching as it is freaking hilarious how bad it is.the DVD cover doesn't even match the film. The crab scene was my favorite. I do recommend this film as a comedy.but based on the film as a whole, it gains no marks from me. But as I haven't laughed so hard in my life, I'm scoring it a ten.

... View More
sleepingbeauty92

I only watched this because it was on Showtime. Oh, OK, it was on Showtime Extreme. And extreme it was! Extremely BAD. I love the old Sinbads. I can take "hokey". I can handle stop-action animation. I can even take weak special effects. I could not handle this hot mess. No reason to break it down, every single part of this movie is awful. Here's a little though: Special effects- cheesy, awful. I think they they just gave up at some point and said, "whatever". Acting -what acting? The actors understandably looked bored most of the time. Writing- they winged it. Not sure anybody cared if there was a storyline. But hey, there's boobs! Watch a rerun, the news, or the paint dry. Anything but this.

... View More
mikemdp

Here's a Sinbad clearly modeled after Robert Downey Jr.'s Tony Stark; a wealthy corporate honcho, sans super armor suit, who finds himself lost on an island filled with giant creatures that really don't do much of anything.Then, later, it turns into a kind of military rebel movie, with some unexciting pit fighting overseen by a Dan Haggerty-looking dude who appears to have been pulled out of a crack house and given a few lines to read. He dies, but you won't care, because you really won't understand why he was in this thing in the first place.The creatures really don't do much more than Harryhausen's did 50 years ago, which is to blink their eyes and growl a lot. But they are occasionally impressive, especially the flying dragon-type things that eat one guy but are apparently frightened away by sharpened sticks and thrown pebbles. However, the devilish monster protecting some mystical volcano stones looks like a heavy metal LP cover come to badly animated life.Oh, and the stones: They hold the secret to escaping the island; which is to say, they can get really hot, for no apparent reason. So, Sinbad uses them to create steam and power a hot-air balloon and fly away. Why, I don't know, FIRE would have worked just as well demands a suspension of my disbelief this movie didn't work hard enough to accomplish.The last third of the movie is so incomprehensible, it's quite likely it was written and directed by someone who speaks no English at all, and who was sniffing glue. It has something to do with a giant squid, Sinbad in a submarine, a bad guy clearly inspired by Jeff Bridges' villain in "Iron Man," poorly rendered tornadoes, an earthquake scene the producers lifted from one of Asylum's dopey disaster movies, and, just for kicks and giggles, Armageddon.Worth the couple of bucks I paid for it, for the few laughs I got at its expense. Only fools and Dan Haggerty would pay more.

... View More
Robert Agar-Hutton

I have seen good movies, bad movies, bad movies that become cult movies and then sadly a few like this where if I had the sense of a dead cat I would have stopped watching.The only good thing was that the design of one of the monsters (bird type things) was quite good - everything else was BAD BAD BAD ...No plot - well at least nothing that made sense. Characters - were as wooden and predictable as it would be possible to imagine. Special effects - on the whole plain bad. Acting - there were real tears from one of the actors - I think it was because they realised that once this turkey was released they would never work again.I can't go on even remembering this movie (which I only finished watching ten minutes ago) as it's causing irreparable brain damage.WATCH ANYTHING ELSE!!!

... View More