Excellent, smart action film.

This movie was so-so. It had it's moments, but wasn't the greatest.

This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.

I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

I had been wanting to see this movie for years after reading so many glowing reviews about it. I am a huge fan of innovative horror films, often low budget B-Movies, that utilize the best from their budget and story while turning out an entertaining flick (i.e. Evil Dead).This movie had everything going for it. An interesting 'alien' creature with no origin (which often makes the best protagonist), an isolated setting, and Shea Whigham stealing every scene he is in. The creature design looks good, when you can actually get a good look at it. And this is the reason why the movie fails. Not by lack of trying, but by editing (and maybe, by budget).Shaky cam/quick cuts kill almost any movie, especially action or horror movies, as the viewer can never quite tell what is going on. It is very evident that the budget was very low, however, the creature effects, though convincing when the camera actually hangs on it for more than a second, apparently were not convincing enough to allow the viewer to get more than a glimpse at a time. This truly kills the tension of the film as the quick cuts of the creature are then continued with even more quick cuts of our main characters' scenes of struggling for survival. What results is a mess...the mind starts wondering what the last quick cut of the monster was, but then is too busy processing the characters' movements with the same quick editing...monster lunges, characters react, same quick editing, etc, etc. The first comparison that comes to mind is Aliens vs. Predator 2, Requiem, where all scenes of the 'monsters' were so barely lit (obviously due to budget constraints), that you literally could not see what was going on. From what I saw from this movie, the effects looked good enough to linger each scene and let it effect the viewer.So, I love the setup, thought the characters were well acted and love the monster. However, the editing kills any enjoyment from this movie. That's my $0.02.

SPOILER FREE REVIEWSplinter is an example of how all you need in the art form of cinema is a decent premise, dedicated actors in their roles, & creative direction. What the film doesn't have is a huge budget, CGI, & big name actors. Not having these, in my opinion benefited this great movie. Splinter is one of the best horror/hostage/science fiction/creature feature movies in a very long time. This film is a great way to return to the basic roots of horror, and science fiction. This movie reminded me very much of an '80s and '90s film Sam Raimi would get Bruce Campbell to sign up for. This whole idea, of some kind of creature taking over our bodies, and dominating, morphing, and killing life on Earth, is a breath of fresh air from the remakes and reboots we've been getting lately. These creatures, and the special practical effects, are so amazing. That just like the creatures themselves they made my bones crack, snap, and pop in unnatural positions. Horror fans like me, especially enjoy these types of effects, because we no longer see them, and if we do, it's not as well done as Splinter. The story is original, and the characters come off as realistic individuals. My only complaint is the movie has some scenes of shaky camera work, when the creature arrives. However, I can see why some people wouldn't mind this. It allows the viewer, to not fully see the creature, and it adds a little bit of suspense. Accordingly, the film is at its finest, when these characters need to make decisions, and the sudden shock of these creatures bursting at you on screen. Hence, even if you are not a fan of horror movies, I believe this movie is worth viewing. Also, if you're in the mood for some fun, shocking moments, and an old style creature feature look no further than Splinter. It's a good damn time fellas. This review is brought to you by Boogie Buddha, and remember don't just get down, but get Boogie. Thank you for reading, and have an amazing day as always. :)

I am a fan of horror movies; cheesy horror movies, scary horror movies, big budget horror movies, and the latter. However, the unfortunate part about following horror movies is that it can be a difficult genre to articulate masterfully.The movie Splinter makes the most out of what it is given, and it puts into place horrific devices that make the horror genre really shine. The film offers wit so far as having space for individual character development and unique character choices. However, the pacing of the movie is not cogent and the movie steered too far away from what makes a movie scary.Still though, it offers sci-fi aspects to it and is well acted throughout - I give Splinter a 6 out of 10.

The first thing I did after watching the first 10 minutes is see what the budget was. The opening scene was so poorly directed, acted and had the worst special effects I have seen in a looooong time. Think 80's B or C level movies.So much can be done with low budget films these days. High school and college kids can make better effects than these. I was embarrassed for the directer. If the effects are truly that bad, don't put them in. Make it off screen, which can be very effective. Disgraceful. I am a fan of low budget movies, and I heard this one was good, but it was just too putrid to watch any more of.