Touches You

How sad is this?

It's entirely possible that sending the audience out feeling lousy was intentional

The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

Unpopular opinion I know. Sorry. The greatest version ever? Not really. Don't get me wrong I do love this adaptation but don't feel it lives up to the original Dickens tale. A lot of the acting felt-to me-either too rushed or dull and monotone. And if it wasn't either of those then it was too over the top. Now I also know many basically worship Alastair Sim but I feel Seymour Hicks portrayed Scrooge in the 1935 movie better. Again I know my opinion is the unpopular one here but that's my feelings on it.

I've seen them all and none measure up to Alastair Sim.I first saw this movie on TV as a child around 1958. I have to watch this movie every year otherwise I can't begin to catch the Christmas spirit. As I got older I'd have to scour TV Guide every year to find out when it was airing. Finally I bought a DVD as soon as it was available. Now I have a .avi file I can watch anywhere. Alastair Sim's portrayal of Scrooge's metamorphosis and redemption rings so true you experience it with him Also watch it to see Kathleen Harrison (Mrs Dilber) imho deliver one of the most moving two word lines in film history in her scene with Scrooge on the stairs.

This is my favorite Scrooge/A Christmas Carol movie of all. I believe that I have seen them all. Although I would never watch the colorized version of the same.Why do they refuse to make great films like this anymore? I wish that there were Saturday matinees near me, so that I could see some of these bygone pictures up on the big screen! Imagine Alastair Sim on a massive theatre screen in the character of Ebenezer Scrooge! I think that people would flock to see this movie if it were offered today, this week. I would, more than once.If you have the chance to see this movie, please do! Do not deprive yourself of a piece of motion picture history, perfection.Blessings of Christmas to all.

This film has been a part of my life since the first time I saw it about 60 years back. No Christmas season has gone by without my watching it again, sometimes more than once, and with the coming of VHS and DVD, I now view it even more often. Why? Well, I am and have always been a fairly voracious reader, and a highly voracious film viewer, and while I certainly cannot claim to have read even one-twentieth of the novels upon which subsequent films were based, of those I have read there are precious few in which the film version has equaled, or perhaps even slightly surpassed, the original. I could probably count them on the fingers of one hand. This is one of them. (Another is the much underrated - but mainly by critics who have never read the novel - DEATH ON THE NILE, the most perfect realization of an Agatha Christie novel ever filmed, and, because so well-made, perhaps a bit more exciting.) But back to A Christmas CAROL. Dickens is arguably the greatest novelist in the English language, and the characters he creates, the dialog he provides for them, and his general commentary on the most dire or comic situations are indelible and unforgettable to anyone who has indulged in reading him. Possibly because of that, most of his greatest novels have had at least one great film version, and most often a good deal of their greatness has been determined by how closely they stick to the original text. Think of the 1930s version of THE OLD CURIOSITY SHOP (with an unforgettable performance by Hay Petrie as Quilp), the 1940s versions of OLIVER TWIST, GREAT EXPECTATIONS and NICHOLAS NICKELBY, and the 1950s version of THE PICKWICK PAPERS. Of course, these all came from England. The one Hollywood excursion into true film greatness by way of Charles Dickens is the incredibly moving 1935 version of A TALE OF TWO CITIES (although they produced a first rate David COPPERFIELD shortly before it). But for me none of these comes as close to a full realization of Dickens as the 1951 Christmas CAROL. Every time I see it I feel like I have truly been transported back to mid-19th century England. The visual filming is absolutely perfect, of course, but it is the performances of the entire cast that make the film the greatest film realization of any of Dickens' works, but most especially that of Alastair Sim as Scrooge. This has to be one of the very greatest acting performances in the entire history of cinema. I have seen any number of other actors in this role - Seymour Hicks, Fredric March (on TV), Albert Finney, George C. Scott, Patrick Stewart - and great actors that they all are, not one comes even close to Sim. As is commented on elsewhere here, he quite literally 'owns' the role, and his is my mind's eye image whenever I think of old Ebenezer Scrooge. (Interestingly, that great British character actor Francis L. Sullivan is my similar mind's eye image of Nero Wolfe whenever I read one of Rex Stout's hilarious mysteries, yet I'm pretty certain Sullivan never played that particular role.) Sim was a great and highly prized comedian, yet his greatest film performance is certainly in this very dramatic and thrilling version of the Dickens classic. And Michael Hordern is just as definitive as the ghost of Jacob Marley - has ever this condemned spirit been so hapless, shrill and self-condemnatory as Hordern makes him, or so concerned with saving his friend Scrooge from the torment now visited upon himself? You can only pray that his condemnation is not for all eternity, but, like Hamlet's ghost, only a temporary state until his sins have been expiated. And, amazingly enough, George Cole, playing Scrooge as a better-hearted young man, looks amazingly like a young Alastair Sim, or at least a young Scrooge who will grow into the old Scrooge we now see before us. For me, this is not just a perfect film realization of a great short novel, but quite simply one of the most perfect movies ever made (another one would be the 1940 THIEF OF BAGDAD, but it was not based on anything so concretely unchangeable as a Dickens novel), one so grandly flawless that the imagination cannot conceive of it ever being done as well again.