Revenge of the Nerds IV: Nerds In Love
Revenge of the Nerds IV: Nerds In Love
R | 09 May 1994 (USA)
Revenge of the Nerds IV: Nerds In Love Trailers

Lewis and his nerdy friends attend Booger's wedding to the daughter of a rich politician, but nerd-haters in the family do everything possible to prevent the wedding going ahead. Meanwhile, Lewis awaits with eagerness the birth of his unborn foetal child...

Reviews
Scanialara

You won't be disappointed!

... View More
Stometer

Save your money for something good and enjoyable

... View More
Allison Davies

The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

... View More
Edwin

The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

... View More
Michael_Elliott

Revenge of the Nerds IV (1994) * (out of 4)Booger (Curtis Armstrong) is about to be married but his future father-in-law doesn't like him because (shock) he's a nerd. Soon the other nerds from the first film are back and find themselves in yet another fight to be accepted as real people. I must admit that this here is a major step-up from the third film but that's really not saying much and in the end we're left with yet another cheap, made-for-TV flick that falls flat on its face in terms of badness. The lack of real laughs is the deadliest thing here as once again the producer's go through all the trouble of getting the original cast back together yet they give them absolutely nothing to work with. The screenplay goes for all of the obvious jokes but this time out they're just boring and unfunny. Seriously, how many times can we see the same nerds put into the same situation and having the same outcome? I almost drowned when I was a kid once and I remember struggling in the water but of course not being able to do anything since there was nothing to grab onto. No matter how hard I tried it was just a lost cause. That thought passed through my head while watching this film because you can tell that the entire cast are trying their hardest to make this thing work but they simply have nothing to work with and you can't help but see the entire film go under. Robert Carradine, Julia Montgomery, James Cromwell and Donald Gibb are just some of the returning crew. Ted McGinley also makes a few quick (and cheap) appearances here. The entire plot is quite predictable but there are a few minor laughs to be had here but in the end you still have to put this into the really bad, really stupid ideas bracket.

... View More
djkeith3984

This movie gets a bad rap. It's actually better than the last 2 sequels. But as "Made for TV" sequels go, they could have just made some piece of sh**. And even though it's not "Gone with the Wind", it has it's moments. The best thing is the inclusion of the original cast. More so than any of the sequels yet. Hell you had, Betty, Stan,Oger, even U.N. Jefferson. The 3-D parts if you saw it when it aired on Fox, were pretty cool...but there is one thing that just pisses me off!!! I'm glad they brought back Gilbert at the end, but "Who the hell is this guy??".Everybody else took a little time out of their schedule to, at least make a cameo. Was Anthony Edwards "Too Busy", to stop by and see some old friends and do that big 2 minute scene. Kudo's to the ones who did. It made you remember what a great movie the original was and a little nerd reunion is not such a bad thing. And Mr. "I'm a big-shot E.R. guy" Edwards,...you too were a nerd. Deal with it!!!!!!

... View More
drloveis

Everything past part one was progressively worse and worse, and this was the bottom of the trash bin.The acting was horrible, the plot was a re-hash of the previous 3 movies, and the writing was as smart as 3rd grade "What I Did Last Summer" report. The main reason for the making of the movie was as a broadcast token.When the Fox Network originally aired this movie in the United States in 1994, it was broadcast with 3D scenes. A little logo would appear on-screen to tell you to put on your special 3-D glasses during certain scenes. The glasses were sold at convienence stores around the time, a marketing tie-in for the occasion. Some of the scenes looked cool in 3-D, like the food fight and the bachelor party, but it was just a novelty and was only worth seeing once, which is exactly how many times it was shown in the 3-D format.When I die, St. Peter will probably frown on me for wasting the two hours of my life that I wasted to watch this crap, when I could have been doing something to help mankind instead.

... View More
Peter-82

This is the worst of the Nerds series and does not do justice to the quailty of the first. The film focuses around Boogers marriage to Janey, the daughter of a "new rich" businessman attempting to enter the politcal scene. The father and son-in-law are essentially the enemies of this film and take over where the jocks left off in earlier movies. This is the great failure of the film (among many) as we are left wanting that final battle between the jocks and Nerds.Several of the actors who appeared in eariler "Nerds" perform admirably given the poor scripting and lack of direction.

... View More