Good concept, poorly executed.

Entertaining from beginning to end, it maintains the spirit of the franchise while establishing it's own seal with a fun cast

Yo, there's no way for me to review this film without saying, take your *insert ethnicity + "ass" here* to see this film,like now. You have to see it in order to know what you're really messing with.

It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

The movie commences in March 1913 amid festivities including the Russian Orthodox ritual, the tercentenary (300th anniversary) of the Romanov rule in Russia. Foreign dignitaries attend, including Archduke Francis Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary. The Archduke was destined to be assassinated by a Serbian national in June 1914, an event that would trigger World War I. The ceremony is interrupted by news of Prince Paul Chegodieff (John Barrymore) that Sergei, the czar's uncle and brother of Grand Duke Igor (C. Henry Gordon) and the father of Princess Natasha (Diana Wynyard), has been assassinated. The czar (Ralph Morgan) orders the suspects to be shot immediately without trial. Chegodieff urges moderation; he is also concerned about negative publicity.Three months later the Czarevitch Alyosha (Tad Alexander), the young son of Czar Nicholas II and a hemophiliac, suffers from a bleeding attack. His life is in danger; his vital signs are posted for public viewing. Enter Grigory Rasputin (Lionel Barrymore), not a priest but a hypnotist and mystic. As he does a better job than the court doctors and appears to heal the boy – at least the symptoms of hemophilia – he gains the favor of Czarina Alexandra (Ethel Barrymore). Because his status rises, he has influence over high appointments, even when the candidate is incompetent. Rasputin happens to enjoy the company of younger women. Paul dislikes this crude and vulgar eccentric, and refers to him as a charlatan, a "Holy Leech." Rasputin in turn develops extreme megalomania: "I will be Russia," he utters. He urges the czar to continue his mobilization and stand up to the German Kaiser and defend Serbia, even if these actions lead to war. As usual, Chegodieff urges moderation. The film is inaccurate here, as Rasputin in real life urged Nicholas not to go to war in 1914. Not only are wars ruinous in lives and property, but the peasants who are armed may not want to turn in their weapons at war's end. These points concerning the First World War are not really covered by the film. In the movie, Rasputin loses the favor of the czarina during the war, a situation that never happened as she backed him to the end. In the film Rasputin has maintained his favor with Czar Nicholas, who eventually dismisses his rival Chegodieff from his military rank. Meanwhile Nicholas has taken over personal command of the Russian armies. The final twenty-five minutes focus on the end of Rasputin (1916) and the removal of the czar the following year. The liquidation of the czar's family subsequently occurred at Ekaterinburg by the Bolshevists (1918). Although the film is fairly accurate about the monk's demise, note that Rasputin's actual death also came as a result of several gunshot wounds. The cyanide-poisoned Tobolsk cakes apparently had little effect. Unlike the film's premise, in real life Rasputin accepted the fateful invitation of his rival to attend the party on 30 December 1916. Although the movie shows the food riots and dissatisfaction of the populace (some stock footage of actual events), it fails to go into detail concerning the fate of the czar's family. Such particulars would include Russia's defeat and withdrawal from the war (1917) and the subsequent civil war fighting between the Reds and Whites. There is another inaccuracy, specifically when the movie earlier implies that the Duma (legislative assembly) was being formed in 1913. Actually the Duma was formed in 1906, following the disastrous defeat of the Russians in the Russo-Japanese War and the Russian revolution of 1905. On the other hand, it is certainly true that people could purchase Rasputin's favor and gain appointments to high office without regard to their qualifications. In the beginning film credits, the cast listing claims that Chegodieff, Natasha, Grand Duke Igor, and Doctor Remezov are fictional characters, but historians will recognize Chegodieff as Prince Feliks Yusupov (one of Rasputin's assassins), Natasha as Princess Irina (Yusupov's wife), and Grand Duke Igor as Grand Duke Nicholas (not the same man as the czar). In real life Prince Feliks Yusupov took offense and in 1934 brought a libel lawsuit against MGM, the film's producers. He won his case. "Rasputin and the Empress" is the only film that features together the three Barrymores: Lionel, Ethyl, and John. They do well enough; that is, in 1930s acting mode. Lionel, although a decade older than Rasputin when the mystic flourished, captures the coarseness of the infamous and enigmatic character, and his impact in Russia's royal court. John's portrayal of the assassin Chegodieff is sympathetic as one who earnestly wants to save Russia from the unpopular eccentric. As for Ethyl, this was her inroad into talkies. Ralph Morgan adequately conveys Czar Nicholas' lack of resolution and astuteness. The costumes and sets are of high quality; the plot is easily followed and maintains interest.

This could have been a true classic. However, it strays far from actual events and abridges the period between the outbreak of the Great War and the killing of the royal family.The three Barrymores -- Lionel, Ethel and John -- are fine as Rasputin, the Empress and Prince Paul, a fictional character who assassinates Rasputin (the real assassin was Prince Feliks Yusupov, who was distressed by the damage that Rasputin was doing to the public image of the royal family).The film correctly shows how Rasputin was interfering with the government and the execution of the Great War. But we don't actually see any sign of the February and October revolutions and the abdication of the czar. In the movie, the royal family is taken by train to a house where they are shot by the Bolsheviks. All of these events happen so suddenly in the film that a casual viewer would lose sense of the chronology.Moreover, the direction is poor and many scenes last too long, making the movie drag.

While this film may be of interest to film purists because of the three Barrymores together for the only time, the movie is lousy history. The acting is more than a bit overdone, a carryover perhaps from the silent days when double takes and facial quirks had to tell the story. Rasputin's death is inaccurate. He was probably not poisoned at all (as an ascetic, he did not eat sweets, poisoned or otherwise), and he was shot several times, not hit over the head with a poker. And the deaths of the Romanovs was not outside in a courtyard but in a closed, dingy cellar. Their doctor died with them--he didn't escape to London. However, in defense of the screenwriter, many of the details of the Rasputin/Romanov disaster were unknown until after the fall of the Soviet Union. Several books published since, including photographs of Rasputin's dead body, for example, do much to fill out the real story.

This is a reasonably decent movie, well acted (particularly by Lionel, who practically chews the scenery as Rasputin) and the sets and costumes are fairly nice. But the main selling point is that this is the only time the three Barrymores -Ethel, John and Lionel did a movie together. It's a good movie but could have been much better.