Rain or Shine
Rain or Shine
| 15 August 1930 (USA)
Rain or Shine Trailers

Young Mary Rainey takes the reins of her deceased father's failing circus. With the help of the Inimitable Smiley Johnson, she hopes to bring fortune back to her ragtag band of ragged shoeleather performers.

Reviews
WasAnnon

Slow pace in the most part of the movie.

... View More
Afouotos

Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

... View More
FrogGlace

In other words,this film is a surreal ride.

... View More
Dirtylogy

It's funny, it's tense, it features two great performances from two actors and the director expertly creates a web of odd tension where you actually don't know what is happening for the majority of the run time.

... View More
MartinHafer

In the early days of sound films, studios really didn't know how to use the new medium. Instead of normal speaking voices and normal actors, Hollywood felt a need to overwhelm the audience with sound. A lot of vaudeville comics who spoke a mile a minute were shoved in front of the cameras to take advantage of the fact that audiences could now hear the actors speak. Some of these early talkies are downright dreadful while some others are just odd curios. RAIN OR SHINE falls into the category of just plain dreadful.Most of the blame for this film being so terrible and tough to watch falls on the shoulders of its director, Frank Capra. While Capra did great things for Harry Langdon during the silent era and from the mid-1930s on he made some of the most iconic American films of the era (IT HAPPENED ONE NIGHT, MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON, MEET JOHN DOE and many others), but even great directors have their duds--and this film was definitely a dud.The film is nominally about a circus that is chronically on the verge of bankruptcy. However, the entire show was the vaudevillian, Joe Cook. While one of the reviewers thought that Cook was hilarious, he was simply too much--like a giant migraine. He talked and talked and talked and talked. If you liked this sort of in your face routine again and again, then you'd probably like the film. However, I didn't think he was funny and felt the director should have placed more emphasis on the talented members of the cast. That, or simply punched Cook in the mouth and told him to shut the heck up!! Terrible pacing, annoying dialog and nothing to like--this is truly one of the most painful films I have seen. I only kept watching because I assumed it would get better---it didn't.

... View More
Michael_Elliott

Rain or Shine (1930) ** (out of 4)Mary Rainey (Joan Peers) takes over her father's circus after his death but soon finds herself in major financial trouble. The manager, Smiley Johnson (Joe Cook), always has a positive spin on everything but soon not even his fast talking can help the situation. Opinions on this film seem to be extremely mixed and I'm going to have to fall on the negative side. It's rather hard and perhaps unfair for my to criticize the film for the reasons I'm going to but here goes. I found Cook to be an incredible talent here and he gives an amazing performance. At the same time I'd say his performance was too amazing because he plays an annoying character and that's exactly how it struck me. The frustration the owner in the film has over his attitude and actions is the same frustration I started to feel and this really started to take away from the film for me. The first thirty-minutes kept me entertained but then I finally hit a wall to where I was wanting to hit certain characters. Again, it's somewhat unfair for me to bash Cook for giving a great performance but I couldn't help but to have his character on my nerves. The supporting performances are rather good as well and that includes Tom Howard as a dimwitted fool who can't keep anything straight. In perhaps the funniest and most unbelievable sequence, Ethel Greer, a real life "Fat Woman", falls out of a trailer and gets stuck in the mud. The men can't pick her up due to her large weight so they have to get an elephant to do the job. This scene is certainly outrageous and in some ways so shocking that I couldn't help but laugh my behind off. The ending picks up a lot of steam but by that point I was pretty much wore out and ready to move on.

... View More
theowinthrop

I regret that I have only seen about two fifths of this nice early talky comedy. You can see the scenes I saw on You Tube.But I have seen enough to see that under the jointly able hands of Joe Cook and director Frank Capra we have a first rate comedy. It's also another example of saving those chunks of the past that we thoughtlessly throw aside. In this case the wonderful but brief Broadway career of Joe Cook, comedian extroadinaire.Who he? That's the tragedy of Broadway fame. Unless a filmed account or a kine-scope or video is made of a classic Broadway turn or performance we have little idea of what audiences of (say 1925) enjoyed. That's one more reason to savor films of W.C.Fields or the Marx Brothers or even the few with Bea Lillie. Cook made a handful of films before illness (Parkinson's disease) cut into his abilities. Savor them - he's well worth it.With the Brothers, Fields, Lillie, Bert Lahr, Jimmy Durante, Victor Moore and William Gaxton, Bobby Clark and Paul McCullough, and a handful more, Cook captured Broadway. He was a great acrobatic comic and juggler. Whether a better juggler than Fields I can't say, but Fields never ventured on tight ropes to do the kinds of things that Cook did (and which is in this film, as it is a circus film: look at him on a wire and twirling four metal hoops around his neck, arms, and loose leg. W.C. did not do that, nor Groucho). Like Groucho, Clark, and W.C., Cook could double-talk with the best of them. His spectacular thing was the totally meaningless explanation or anecdote. It works this way - he comes to somebody doing something, and starts going into a long discussion which seems to be heading to some point regarding the activity going on. Then, all of a sudden, the anecdote is finished. Only it has not gotten to anything of use to the hearer. In this film there is a scene where Tom Howard (A.K. Shrewsberry - feed merchant, unsuccessful debt collector, and unwilling partner of Cook's Smiley Johnson) is cleaning his vest from a mustard stain. Cook stumbles on him and sees what he's doing. Suddenly he remembers from his youth how he had cereal (corn flakes) for breakfast, and how he did not use the regular milk but evaporated (canned) milk and sugar. One day...but watch You Tube to see the result of the story and Howard's total incredulity at the end about what he hears and what's it supposed to illustrate.The other two sections of the film on You Tube deal with how Cook (who owes Howard a huge feed bill) double-talks the other one out of his lawful position as creditor. From the start Howard is in trouble, as Cook has him passing out circus fliers, and as he makes a solid, sensible comment on a passing statement. Howard says, "I want to have a conversation with you in private." Cook replies, "That's impossible - we'll be together." Howard is doomed from the start.There is also the best portion of the segments on YOU TUBE of what happens when the unpaid circus performers go on strike after the audience fills the big top. There Cook shows his skills as an acrobat and juggler. You will be deeply impressed. You'll also see a mop top assistant - Cook's partner/stooge Dave Chasen, adding his bits to the sequence. Chasen eventually became famous for his restaurant to the stars (like Romanov's) in Hollywood - also called Chasen.By the way, my mention in the summary line is truly based on what I have read on Cook. I don't know if he ever put it on film before he stopped making movies, but his best remembered stage stunt was to walk out on stage strumming a ukulele, and telling the audience he was going to imitate a four man Hawaiian band performing at once. Two are dancing (he swivels his hips and taps a foot), one is playing the uke, and one is whistling. Then he says, "You may wonder why I am doing this." He launches into a pointless discussion on how he gradually invested his money well, made it into a larger and larger pile, and got about $50,000.00 (in 1925 money). Then he stops and looks at the audience, and says "And if I have $50,000.00 why should I imitate four Hawaiians performing at once!" So he'd stop and walk off the stage, as the audience roared with laughter.I wish more of that work could have been preserved.

... View More
F Gwynplaine MacIntyre

In the 1930s, Joe Cook was one of the biggest stars on Broadway, headlining in several hit musical comedies. He co-starred with Ethel Merman in the Broadway show "Fine and Dandy", getting billing equal to Merman's. Joe Cook's talents were amazing: he was a juggler, an acrobat, a song-and-dance man and a comedian who did weird monologues while wiggling his thumbs. Tragically, he succumbed to Parkinson's disease after making only two feature films and a few shorts. "Rain or Shine" is the film version of one of his Broadway musical hits, with all the songs left out ... and it's the best surviving evidence of Cook's astonishing talents. "Rain or Shine" is also an excellent example of Frank Capra's early directorial skill.In this movie, Cook plays the utility man in the Rainey Circus, which gives performances "Rain or Shine" ... except that it's always raining. When most of the circus performers can't go on, Cook becomes virtually a one-man circus, with just a couple of helpers for his acrobatic routines. Joe Cook's chief stooge in this film (and on Broadway) was Dave Chasen, a Harpo-ish comedian who later became famous as the founder of Chasen's Restaurant in Los Angeles. Chasen's schtick was a distinctive hand-waving gesture which many comedians today are still copying.Joe Cook is brilliant in this film. In one scene, he does an astonishing juggling trick with a cigar and a kitchen match that will make you want to rewind several times so you can watch it again ... and again, and again! It looks so simple, yet Cook must have spent hundreds of hours practising this one trick."Rain or Shine" has a lot of broad slapstick humour, most of it hilarious. One scene at a dinner party doesn't work, involving a huge pile of spaghetti. We can clearly see that the "spaghetti" is really twine, which kills the joke. Unfunny comedian Tom Howard plays a grouch named A.K. Shrewsbury, and there's an obscure joke about what an "A.K." he is. (A.K. = "alter kocker", a Yiddish insult.)Among the circus acts in this movie is Ethel Greer, a fat lady who weighed well over 25 stone. I was astonished by the scene in which this huge woman falls out of her circus caravan into a rain puddle. Ethel Greer actually did this stunt herself, because no stuntwoman was large enough to double for her. Kenneth Anger's book "Hollywood Babylon 2" contains a photograph of an immensely fat woman whom Anger unkindly claims is Elizabeth Taylor. She's not, you know: she's Ethel Greer, and the photo in Anger's book is a scene from "Rain or Shine". Also in this movie is a snake charmer, played by silent-film comedienne Louise Fazenda in a rare sound-film appearance. (Fazenda married producer Hal Wallis and retired.)Some bad news: the dignified African-American actor Clarence Muse appears in this film, playing one of the "Yassah, boss" roles that Frank Capra kept lumbering him with. In Capra's autobiography, he refers to Muse as his "pet actor". No comment. SPOILER WARNING: At this film's climax, the circus tent catches fire. There's an exciting sequence as Cook and all the circus hands try to put out the flames. Ironically, the only time it STOPS raining on the circus in "Rain or Shine" is when the tent is on fire and the rain would have done some good. As soon as the fire is out, the rain starts pouring down again. "Rain or Shine" is must-see viewing! My rating: 10 out of 10, since Joe Cook's brilliant talents more than compensate for any of this film's flaws.

... View More