Good , But It Is Overrated By Some

Crappy film

Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

It is an exhilarating, distressing, funny and profound film, with one of the more memorable film scores in years,

You have seldom seem a picture so crowed with excitement ¡ . It starts in Dortshire coast, Moonfleet , England, 1775 ,october , (Moonfleet is set in Dorset, England The Fleet refers to the land just west of Portland, Southern England ) a young boy named John Mohune (John Whiteley) is sent by his deceased mummy to seek Jeremy Fox (Stewart Granger) who is actually a rakish buccaneer . Then Fox puts him under his protection and is proceeded a special father-son relationship . The boy learns that Fox is both a ex-lover of his mum and the leader of a band of smugglers. Meanwhile both of whom look for and encounter a legendary lost diamond . Fox still haunted by the memory of the dying mother but also has another lover (Viveca Lindfords) who double-crosses him . This classic adventure film contains emotion , intrigue , chills, and colorful scenarios. Wonderful relationship along with strong friendship is developed between the buccaneer perfectly incarnated by Stewart Granger and the newcomer boy . It contains dark moments in Hammer style as happens when the young boy journeys across an eerie world full of hanging trees , gallows , ghastly sculptures , and cemeteries plenty of coffins . Wonderful secondary cast full of prestigious secondaries as George Sanders , Joan Greenwood , Alan Napier , John Hoyt , Jack Elam , Ian Wolfe , among others . Impressive production design with glamorous sets by Hans Peters . Glimmer cinematography in superb Eastmancolor and CinemaScope by Robert Planck and mostly filmed in studios , during six weeks in 1954 , being exteriors shot in Oceanside , California. Thrilling and emotive musical score by Miklos Rozsa . The motion picture lavishly produced by also actor John Houseman is stunningly directed by Fritz Lang . Lang directed masterfully all kind of genres as Noir cinema as ¨Big heat , Scarlet Street and Beyond a reasonable doubt¨ , Epic as ¨Nibelungs¨, suspense as ¨Secret beyond the door, Clash by night¨ , Western as ¨Rancho Notorious and Return of Frank James ¨ and of course Adventure as ¨Moonfleet¨ . This good adventure drama with lots of exciting and thrilling moments will appeal to Stewart Granger fans . Rating : Better than average , resulting to be a marvellous stylised version of the Great Britain coast in the 19th century . Worthwhile watching .

This film is overrated in France which at first sight appears bizarre to say the least but when you see that the same country gives first class status to a boring, intolerable and annoying comedian like Jerry Lewis, ANYTHING is possible ! That said, the film certainly makes for good entertainment and both Stewart Granger and George Sanders are very entertaining, as is the boy who plays John Mohune. I am not sure where this was filmed but had difficulty recognizing the Dorset Coast which is one of the most spectacular coasts in the British Isles. The main negative point of the film is the plot which is fairly limited and leaves the spectator thirsting for something a little more meaty. As much of the film is seen through the eyes of the child, this bestows an original quality upon it. I have not read the original novel so have no way of comparing it to the film but in general I tend to compare films and novels separately and not always try to see if the film adheres closely to the novel. Certain licence must be taken when bringing something to the screen. The DVD of Moonfleet was issued in France sometime during the first half of this year (2007).

I know the original novel, aimed at male children and adolescents, but this monstrosity of a screen-play has little connection to it, and the changes are not for the better. Why didn't they change the name of the film and have a completely new set of names for the characters? If it was to attract people who knew the original story, was that well-advised? They would only come away from a viewing disgusted and angry. The original story had its faults and weaknesses, but the story in the film is sheer nonsensical rubbish.In the novel, the boy is older and a native of the village, he has a living mother, his helper is Elzevir Block who is the inn-keeper, there are no lords or aristocrats, only a miser-merchant who bought the manor-house; the boy is involved in the smuggling, led by Elzevir Block, there are no pirates or piracy; and he, the boy, returns to village when a man only through luck and the self-sacrifice of Elzevir Block, and there meets his childhood sweetheart. Other than the possibly-supernatural occurrences, the book plot is in many ways realistic.

I saw this movie projected onto a screen, from the DVD, I think; it looked as good as old films usually do. I found it very enjoyable and was surprised that I had not seen it before. However, I feel gratified to read the complaints by one member here who could not figure out all the plot details: I couldn't, either! Now, after reading more information or speculation about the making of the film, I see why. I found that there is a whole website and society devoted to the author of the book, John Meade Falkner, and a biography of him was published not long ago.This is my first time viewing this website. I'm impressed by the quality of the comments; I'll definitely come back.