Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Surprisingly incoherent and boring

The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

I was 21 when this aired, a big fan of the 1944 movie "Laura" and was eagerly anticipating it. However, I remember being very disappointed. I know Radziwill got poor reviews from the critics and it seemed to end her acting career. It might have rerun within that same year. Then it disappeared. I'd almost forgotten it. I do remember a published comment by Robert Stack. Something about the way the camera lenses were used to make Radziwill look younger and "they had me looking like Grandma Moses." And he was right, he looked shockingly old and wrinkled. I looked it up and he was 49 and she was 35 at the time.I would call it a teleplay because it was staged like play not like a TV movie. It had a distinguish cast, but I remember thinking she wasn't a very good actress and wasn't surprised by the critics.

I was 14 years old when I saw this. Though it was not television at its finest (Lee Radziwill deservedly got the "Worst Actress" nod from "TV Guide" critic Cleveland Amory), I didn't think it was the disaster everyone else claimed it to be. The two memorable moments are described in detail by previous posters. I'm so glad someone besides me thinks Capote's ending is superior to the feature film's and I too appreciated the Arlene Francis/Farley Granger moment. Would love to see this again! It's hard for me to believe no one out there has a copy of it. If you find it's available anywhere, please let me know! Ed-176

I thought Radziwill was fine, though not as charismatic as Tierney, but Stack was at least as good as Dana Andrews, and George Sanders was just as good as Webb (meaning that both were absolutely perfect). The big improvement, though, was the casting of Arlene Francis and Farley Granger in the parts played in the movie by Judith Anderson and Vincent Price. Price came off as a eunuch and Anderson as an iron maiden, whereas Francis had an itch and Granger was the stud who could scratch it. I remember one scene where we burst into Francis's apartment and found them tangled up on the sofa together. He did his sort of "who-me?" innocent boy thing, and Francis was all "Yeah, what?" with an unapologetic smirk. You could certainly understand what part of Laura Farley Granger had appealed to, whereas Price simply came off as Tierney's charity project. I'd love to see it again lo these many years later.

I have a misty, none-too-clear memory of having watched this when it appeared on TV. SPOILER The main thing which stuck with me, though -- the "touch" which marked this as Capote's take on the story -- was that, when Sanders as Lydecker ended up in the apartment with the gun, what he did was shoot the face off the painting of Radziwill's Laura. As if, in other words, he were revenging himself against the image which haunted them all.Blam! Thud! Wow, man, what an *inspiration* . . . .