It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.

Story: It's very simple but honestly that is fine.

This is ultimately a movie about the very bad things that can happen when we don't address our unease, when we just try to brush it off, whether that's to fit in or to preserve our self-image.

The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

I recommend this one to movie lovers for its clever plot. I have never seen such a clever plot that keeps twisting throughout the whole movie. To be honest, I wasn't expecting much out of this movie, given the British accent. Don't get me wrong! It's just that I'm not familiar with the British movies as much as I am with American movies. I just don't get the British way of rending movies. I salute the writer for this clever plot. It's really gripping. At the beginning, I didn't really get what was going on, but later I realized that something smart was being done on the screen. Some real entertainment. Don't miss out on this one.

If you have a movie billed as "noir" and you set that movie in a sunny tropical locale and the bulk of the footage is in the daylight, you can't call it "noir". It's not "noir", I mean there's no law on Earth to stop you from calling it "noir"- but it won't be the genuine article. A movie that's in the "noir" genre is always in the shadows specifically literally but also metaphorically, usually it's a detective story or a crime story, and it almost always has a dark ending. You don't have to follow these rules but you deviate at your own risk, a monster movie without a monster is not a real monster movie. A noir movie with a happy ending and it's filmed in coastal f*cking Australia in the f*cking daytime is not a real noir movie. If you think I quibble, I only quibble cause I f*cking care.

Once is never enough" – a tagline used to promote Kill Me Three Times and a tagline that couldn't be more far from the truth as one single watch of this dire Australian black comedy is most certainly enough.On the back of one of the most successful Australian films of all time, Red Dog, you'd think that long time director Kriv Strenders would've known a thing or two about making a competent and well-made feature length film but judging by Kill Me Three Times, the director certainly has a fair bit more to learn about what it takes to deliver when it comes to filmmaking treats.Kill Me Three Times is sad to say as a proud Australian, yet another telling example of why quite often local productions fail to resonate with either local or international audiences and while the locations of this West Australian set comedy/thriller certainly look nice and I'm sure the crew enjoyed their two weeks away in the sun and sand, Kill Me Three Times lacks any type of personality, heart or most tellingly for a comedy caper like this, wit. Too often Australian productions come off as amateurish and rushed and Stenders film is both of those things plus more with an abysmal scripting, unlikeable characters, plodding editing and one of the single most annoying scores ever committed to screen by Johnny Klimek (without exaggeration the score is almost too much to handle) and not even a name cast can save the film.Cast against type as a hit-man who likes to laugh (a lot) Simon Pegg is the single watchable acting presence in the entire production in which the likes of 300's Sullivan Stapleton, Warm Bodies' Teresa Palmer and local industry veteran Bryan Brown all meander about getting to chew on atrocious dialogue and get involved in increasingly unlikely circumstances. Perhaps they all signed on thinking this was going to be some type of Aussie flavoured Pulp Fiction but more likely they all saw the benefits of a nice paid holiday.With an insubstantial plot, a lack of any rhythm or rhyme and with a wasted cast, this nasty box office and critical flop is most defiantly not worth your time. A shame as there was potential here but in the end being killed once is more than enough as we're safe then, never having to watch this tripe again.1 why didn't I just watch Red Dog? out of 5

Despite being a Simon Pegg film, I wouldn't call this one a comedy exactly. While there are some darkly funny elements, this isn't really a funny film--in fact, it's very violent and bloody. Now this is not a complaint--it's actually a very good film and is well worth seeing.When the film begins, you are a bit confused. Once you realize that the film is NOT shown in sequence, it all begins to make more sense. It seems that an assassin (Pegg) has wandered into a strange situation where he watches all sorts of people killing each other! Why and what's it all about...watch the film to see.I noticed one reviewer who compared this to a Tarantino film--and that's a reasonable comparison. And, like some of his films, it is darkly funny but certainly not a comedy--such as what you'd see in "Pulp Fiction". Now I am not saying this Pegg film is in the same league as this Tarantino classic...but it is clever and well made. But it also starts off slow and seems pretty awful until all the story elements start coming together.