I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Good movie but grossly overrated

The acting in this movie is really good.

There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

I did not enjoy this film one little bit. The story was almost incomprehensible. If this was supposed to be fantasy, it was fantasy rubbish. I kept watching in a state of disbelief, wondering how so much money and how so many talented actors were wasted on this travesty. I hoped it would get better, but it only got worse and worse and worse. I could never recommend this film under any circumstances. I feel annoyed with myself for wasting so many precious minutes of my time on this unedifying spectacle.

a remarkable cast. inspired locations. and a novel. that is basis. and single virtue of film. because it is a hard work to adapt Inkheart and this product is fundamental proof. sure, it is not really bad but it is not good. only exercise who may be good advertising for rediscover books and discover great novels as source of unforgettable miracles. but is it enough ? because powerful pillars as Helen Mirren or Andy Serkis, the experience of Mumies for Brendan Fraser, are important but the building has not roof. a cast is not great choice without a solid story. and in this case, the story seems be a sketch from Inkheart. in same time, it is not waist of time. only entertainment for children. and nice support for expect a better version.

I really really enjoyed this movie. I'm very picky when choosing what movie to watch. Frankly, I only knew a little about this movie at first but was compelled to watch it for an odd reason. Also, I didn't hear the best reviews about this movie from surrounding people. The acting was well-played by all the cast members. It's definitely a fantasy but not a childish one at all. It keeps you guessing in the beginning. I tried to put the pieces of the puzzle together before it's all revealed and I found it amusing whether I was wrong or right. Brendan Fraser was a good in acting as he usually is, but I found the fictional book characters such as Paul Bettany and even Rafi Gavron displayed great acting skills that made the book characters so believable. I did not read the book, so I have nothing to compared this movie to. Still, if you want something exciting, then watch this movie.

I have not read the books, but I have heard nothing but good things. I did enjoy Inkheart on the whole, but something was missing in translation and I can't put my finger on it.Inkheart does have a number of good things. The visuals, down from the cinematography, settings and costumes, are truly excellent and Javier Navarette's score is enchanting. The film is well-directed as well.And overall, I did enjoy the acting. The best of the lot comes from Paul Bettany who is stunning and steals every scene he's in and Helen Mirren who is deliciously batty. Brendan Fraser is dashing as well, Jim Broadbent is very entertaining and there is a believable child performance from Eliza Bennett. For me, the only two performances that didn't work were Sienna Guillory who was bland and dare I say sometimes irritating both in character and acting and (sadly) Andy Serkis who doesn't get anywhere near enough screen time to shine properly.While the flawed assets have enough magic, heart and charm to them, they are still flawed. The story structure(great idea by the way) and script are both disjointed overall, and some parts felt rushed such as the ending. The characters are likable too, but also under-developed and fall into cliché territory.Overall, enjoyable and charming but there is nothing really spectacular apart from some performances, the music and visuals. 6/10 Bethany Cox