Terrible acting, screenplay and direction.

Overrated and overhyped

Nice effects though.

Not sure how, but this is easily one of the best movies all summer. Multiple levels of funny, never takes itself seriously, super colorful, and creative.

Setting aside all the blatant flaws, such as the utterly insane attempt at a plot or the phoned-in voice acting, this film contains some of the most awful CGI I've ever seen. Every single character has weird floaty eyes where their irises regularly float out of their eye sockets.It's incredibly disconcerting and I'm sorry I can't describe the effect better. All I can say is that it looks like the character's faces were designed by someone who has never made eye contact with another living human being. Once you notice the weird eyes (and you will within 5 minutes) you'll spend the rest of the movie being freaked out by them.Fortunately you won't be missing much because the rest of the show is abysmal. It's a complete nonsense story about hating Jules Verne and trying to satirize European politics. Neither topic is a good basis for a kids' movie.

It was bad. Really bad. And I am Peruvian, so when it was in theaters, it only lasted 2 weeks. I mean Shultz is a C class director. If you look at his movies, they have all been rated under five stars. I've watched every film he has directed, he has not directed much films. Six films only.I mean, he's not an eligible director.I sad that the Illusionauts is a Peruvian film. I liked the soundtrack, and maybe the little dog. But everything else was just poop! And if Shultz is reading this:GO TO SCHOOL, FOOL!I mean, the movie sucked as the movie "Attila"(2013). It was Horrible. I was desperate to leave the cinema while watching this junk. I mean, It's a surprise it's not on the IMDb Bottom 100! So hopefully, Shultz stops directing films and is replaced by someone who knows how to direct movies.

Hmmmm. The idea of saving good literature had some life but the movie's execution did not hit the mark. Adults will figure out what the disjointed scenes are trying to accomplish but kids only notice the potty humor throughout. Kids 3,7 and 9 identified with the puppy and liked the space scene while three adults believed it might have a chance if strong family values had been a priority. As it turned out the writers doused any chance of success by themselves being confused with what families want. Hint: Burping and farting might get laughs from some but truly are not attractive nor a model for success. We turned it off midstream and had a discussion with the kids who agreed that it was not appropriate and that the story could have floated on its own. Too bad they sunk themselves.

I got nothing against the previous review I mean I can't "defend" this movie much and people are free to think what they want after all, but I believe every movie deserves a constructive review rather than a destructive one. Soundtrack is good and I strongly disagree on the technique part being bad I think its quite good you can clearly see and feel the character expressions and in small details like the lions hair, you can see that animators have put a lot of work on this movie. But still,THE MOVIE IS BAD.The problem here isn't the animation: The problem is the writer. SAME problem that Eduardo Schuldt has on all his movies. He should really hire someone for the scripts because he's giving peruvian cinema a bad name by doing so himself.