Very well executed

Sadly Over-hyped

not horrible nor great

Just intense enough to provide a much-needed diversion, just lightweight enough to make you forget about it soon after it’s over. It’s not exactly “good,” per se, but it does what it sets out to do in terms of putting us on edge, which makes it … successful?

I haven't read up on the making of, but this one feels like it was shot back-to-back with part 2. Actually it feels more like a successor (in tone and story-wise) to its predecessor than part 1 does with any of those two sequels. If you take into account that the first one was the best one, that isn't really a good thing though. But we have our written introductions back, which is a nice thing. Still worked best in the first Feast movie though.The subtitle of the movie is happy finish, but I kinda have a feeling they wanted to use "endings" instead of finish. I might be wrong, but that would have been more of a fit (especially thinking of "sloppy seconds" and its meaning). Some nice ideas and one theme towards the end, that reminded me of something out of a Monthy Python movie (and the Holy Grail that is). And because you can't satisfy everybody with an ending, we get the "wtf" treatment here. Same director as the other Feast movies

As part 2 left us on the roof , this movie picks up right where it left off. In fact it kind of rewinds a bit and goes in to more details about the ways and means of death caused to the last few murdered in part 2. This movie is the same cast, or surviving cast and takes them off the roof and into the jail where they have to deal with the meth head hobo and soon a new hero named "Sh*tkicker" - Thye find meth heads secret meth lab which is a school bus underground and they hijack it. They eventually meet a cape wearing (Obi-Wan Kenobi wanna be) man named prophet who has a power over the creatures (we soon find its a weak power) Prophet leads them underground where they meet a young martial arts bad boy named Jean Claude Segal and they stay underground forever trying to stay alive and find a way into the city through the sewers. All kinds of wild twist and turns happen as they try to reach their bloody yet happy finish.Worst of the 3 and the main reason for that in my opinion was the fact it was so dark, the underground scenes are dark and hard to follow. The monsters aren't as present here and once underground they meet weird people who are psychotic and have nothing to do with the story at all, yet they have to fight and kill them. The whole underground part (which was most of the movie) was horrible. The new characters were all rather dull with the exception of Jean-Claude. The movie seemed to go downhill from the trilogy and was just very disappointing. It had a completely different and very unoriginal feel to it.John's direction was good, but it was sloppy and dark most of the time. Mike Leahy was back on production and he might be a big part of the problem I am not sure. Edward's music failed here too, and the writing duo of Dunstan and Melton seemed thrown together and careless. There was even a crappy ending with a gigantic terminator looking robot that made no sense and the movie ends with a Mariachi singer doing a Spanish theme song to tie all 3 films in. Craig Henningten did great as Jean-Claude and Tom Gulager was amazing playing his part with a piece of metal stuck through his entire head.. and of course Clu is always good.It was good ONLY if you like the first two, which I did greatly, but it goes down hill as the movie progresses... The song mentions a part 4 but I hope that doesn't happen.5/10 stars

Better than II or worse then II? There is some debate on that.At least we can clearly see the monsters in this one.The gore is worse than ever with decapitations, and the monster eating the head whole, and then, I kid you not, eliminating the uneaten head.If you have epilepsy, you might not want to watch the last 10 minutes or so. It flashes on and off and it made me dizzy.It was better that Feast II, but not by much. It was a gore-fest with lots of action, but it was hard to follow exactly what was going on most of the time.The ending was a real shock!

This is a very spontaneous and random movie, even more than part 2, stuff just happens out of nowhere. Especially when they introduce all these random characters that don't even play a big part but used as a tool for some crude humor and deaths. I will say that it's better than part 2 though, but nowhere as good as the first. And that is cause it finally comes to somewhat of a conclusion although even the ending was a serious WTF. It just throws stuff at the audience without explaining anything what so ever. Even when new characters are introduced such as the Prophet, Jean Claude Segal and few others with the Prophet being able to ward off the monsters, the characters don't even ask how he does it, and after that scene the character goes nowhere, sometimes I like gory movies but this was just absolutely ridiculous, but it's at least better than part 2 since it's more chaotic and you get to see more of the biker chicks tits although a lot of it was rubbish. John Allen Nelson character who seem like the new hero of the group gets killed off right off the bad and your left with loser and idiots all over again, seriously why introduce a character just so he gets killed in the most stupid way imaginable, they already did this in the first movie and it was funny, but pointless in part 3 and after it goes through a longer introduction, it just irritating to watch. Also there really wasn't a point to let Honey Pie survive the second ordeal cause she just becomes a tool for some more repulsive deaths and she is like in the front cover of the DVD but gets killed, right off the bat as well. Well at least they at least tried to be somewhat ballsy.6.6/10