Wonderful character development!

Dreadfully Boring

A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.

This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

Director: MARSHALL NEILAN. (No writers credited). Film editors: Helene Turner, Joseph Josephson. Photography: Mack Stengler. Music composed by George Henninger, arranged by Erno Rapee. Art director: Robert Stevens. Assistant director: Jack Chapin. Producer: J. D. Trop. Produced at Sun Haven Studios, distributed by Pinnacle Productions. Not copyrighted 1934, no New York opening, no recorded release dates or length.SYNOPSIS: An old voodoo woman returns to a bayou plantation to exact vengeance on the owner she alleges killed her husband fifteen years before. She is accompanied by a young half-caste, Jim, and her 18- year-old daughter, Chloe, who falls in love with the plantation's overseer. Both her "mother" and her potential suitor, Jim, strongly object to this alliance. Jim is so madly in love with Chloe, he battles a crocodile, a corrupt turpentine worker and a voodoo gang on her behalf. On the other hand, "mother" is so vengeful, she has Chloe abducted and bound on the voodoo altar for a human sacrifice.NOTES: A remarkably rare film, "Chloe" is not listed at all in the main volumes of The Motion Picture Guide, nor even in the comprehensive title listings of The Film Daily Yearbook. Nor does the movie appear in any of the filmographies of the players or technicians, but one: Erno Rapee. Final film of silent star, Olive Borden, who died in 1947 (at the early age of 41). First film of Philip Ober. COMMENT: It's odd that such a well-produced movie received such obviously limited distribution. Marshall "Mickey" Neilan was one of the top ten directors of the 1920s. Unlike many of his colleagues, he seems reasonably at home in sound. The only items that date the film in fact are Olive Borden's slightly too expressive playing of the title role (and she has plenty of excuses as she faces up to more terrifying experiences in an hour than most movie heroines cover in a lifetime) and the beautiful green stock on which the film is printed. (What a blow that sepia was the only tone that survived into the 1940s. I love green and blue equally well, I remember Fox's Kidnapped was originally shown in 1938 on green stock). Neilan's direction of the actors is not only very capable, his pacing is A-1, his eye for pictorial effects marvelous. I don't like to single out one or two players from such an able cast, but Philip Ober is especially charismatic as the daring Jim (his fight with the croc puts Johnny Weissmuller to shame]), whilst Reed Howes (make sure you see "The Dawn Rider") seems one of the most personable and under-rated leading men in pictures.Neilan hasn't made the usual "independent" mistake of economizing on music. If anything, some would object that there's too much background music. Not a single second in the entire picture is silent. But I loved it. And as for Mack Stengler's superlative cinematography... With its fascinating locations and unstinting effects, powerful plotting and characterizations, Chloe is a "B" gem.

Olive Borden was one of the most beautiful and successful actresses of the 1920s. Unfortunately by 1934 her career was ruined by salary demands and a bad reputation. Chloe, Love is Calling would be Olive's final film. It's a low-budget movie set in the Southern swamps. Olive plays Chloe, the light skinned daughter of a voodoo priestess. Unfortunately the plot has a lot of racist elements and most people give this movie bad reviews. I thought it was an interesting story and I enjoyed seeing Olive (although this is certainly not her best performance). An interesting piece of trivia is that Olive was dating the director of this film Marshall Neilan. If you're a fan of Olive Borden it's definitely worth your time to watch Chloe. It's a public domain film and can be seen for free on You Tube or the Internet Archive. Sadly Olive died penniless in 1947 at the young age of 41.

A black voodoo priestess comes out of the Louisiana swamps to take revenge on the white plantation owner she believes killed her husband.This was produced by some small independent company called Pinnacle. It's a production company that distributed a handful of these plantation movies in the 20s and 30s. Some other reviewer here who obviously has an ax to grind, claims the black actors are played by white people. He probably thinks the Amos & Andy TV show featured white actors in blackface too. To be fair, there are two characters who are supposed to be black but are white. The title character, Chloe is supposed to be of mixed race and she is played by a famous silent film star. This is her last picture. Her star had dimmed and she wound up first joining the army (WACS) after this film and years later was found scrubbing floors for a living. In 1947, at the age of 40, she died of a "stomach ailment" at the Sunshine Mission - a home for destitute women on Los Angeles' Skid Row.One of her two love interests is white too, playing a black man.If you really examine the film, the white characters are all stereotypes -- rich, sauntering around in white suits drinking frilly drinks talking about their deals. While a few others are working class with hillbilly accents. The black characters are largely silent and working plantation. Except for the voodoo priestess who has a fair amount of dialog. This women was up for the role of Mammy in Gone with the Wind.What I'm saying is this: the film is far more complicated than just a knee jerk response of saying all the blacks are stereotypes. Everybody in this movie is a stereo type of some sort. And casting a white actress (probably because she was a real star at one time, hence an audience draw) would make it hard back then to cast a true black man as a romantic interest. Conversely, how could they cast a black actress with a white love interest in 1934?To a degree you can almost make the case that this movie is an allegory for the unfairness of race relations. In today's world of political correctness I suppose few are willing to look beyond a kool-aide drinking response to the content of the movie.Chloe and white Reed fall in love because of what's inside, not because of race or wealth or anything else.So is it a good movie? To be honest, the available prints are bad. The focus is off and the sound is poor, so it's a wee bit difficult to follow the story. At some point we find out that Chloe is actually the colonel's lost daughter who disappeared at birth. But the Colonel welcomes her with open arms, and that's likely not to happen if she was half black in those times.The women in the film are the ones to question whether or not Chloe is really the colonel's daughter, saying "she's so dark." Again a comment on racist mindsets and small minded people.I found the movie to be very watchable despite to poor print quality. I think it deserves a new look, perhaps with a complete print. The DVD prints have 8 minutes cut out of them and one wonders what's in those 8 minutes! Some reviewers have said it's typical that the white man comes out on top in this movie, but the real moral of the movie is that love comes out on top.If you have an open mind and are sick of people with an agenda, take a look at this movie. It's not a great film, but it's an interesting curio piece that probably deserves to be restored.

Marshall Neilan was the "wiz kid" and "boy wonder" director of the 1920s. Even though he had been directing films since 1913 he was "officially" discovered by Mary Pickford and given his chance to direct her in "Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm" (1917). Then he was on his way. He loved good times and plenty of them and also like some other members of the film community he made an enemy of Louis B Mayer. High living caught up with Neilan and by the end of the 20s he was reduced to doing some uncredited directing in "Tanned Legs". Neilan only made a couple more films after Chloe although just before he died he won high praise for his role in "A Face in the Crowd" (1957).Sadly, it was Olive Borden's last film. She had been considered one of the most beautiful actresses of the 20s, but she was also a victim of high living, though in Chloe, she still retained some of her beauty.Chloe is coming back to her childhood home. Her "mammy" Mandy, is using voodoo to wreak vengeance on the rich family because she thinks the colonel killed her husband. Chloe can't reconcile to the fact that she may have "coloured" blood in her. After words with Jim, who says she will never find a "white" man to love her (he secretly loves her himself) Chloe falls into a crocodile infested swamp and is rescued by Wade Carson (Reed Howes). He also falls for her and she returns his love because he is the "white" man she has always dreamed about.When the colonel goes to Mandy's cabin to confront her about some voodoo charms and a missing photo he finds a child's dress and shoes that belonged to his little daughter. She drowned in the river 15 years before and her body has never been found. After a few doubts it is proved that Chloe is the colonel's daughter and the way is clear for her to marry Wade. Chloe is the most racist person in the film. Even though she was raised and loved by Mandy, the black priestess, she has no reciprocal feelings for her - only feelings of fear and loathing. She seems to dislike Jim because he feels comfortable around the black people. He is quite the nicest person in the film, having risked his life for her several times but she doesn't have any friendly feelings for him. She is horrible.This film does not resemble "White Zombie" in the least, except for the voodoo references - it has more in common with "Pinky" (1949).Reed Howes, who had a long career (1923-1964) mostly uncredited parts - plays Wade Carson. Molly O'Day sister of the better known Sally O'Neil, had her best role as Curley Boyle in "The Patent Leather Kid" (1927). She plays Joyce, the Colonel's daughter.I can't recommend this film.