I am only giving this movie a 1 for the great cast, though I can't imagine what any of them were thinking. This movie was horrible

This is a coming of age storyline that you've seen in one form or another for decades. It takes a truly unique voice to make yet another one worth watching.

Not sure how, but this is easily one of the best movies all summer. Multiple levels of funny, never takes itself seriously, super colorful, and creative.

Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.

***SPOILERS*** Little British mystery in not only who killed who but who of the two involved was the one who was killed. It's the down on his luck and the balls of his a** interior designer Jack Taylor, Duncan Lamont,who ends up both with the sh*t end of the stick as well as dead when he has it out at his workshop with his best friend Jimmy Thompson,Donald Gray, accusing Jimmy of having an affair with his wife Diana ,Jane Hylton, then getting himself shot with his own gun. The fact that Jimmy was only trying to help Jack out of his financial troubles came out later that made it all that much worse.It was during the fight that the place caught fire from a lighted cigarette that made the task of identifying the body or what was thought to be Taylor's almost impossible. That's until a tooth was found that in fact revealed who the dead man really was. It's Diana who's given the 3rd degree by Police Inspector Bob Edwards,Meredith Edwards,in where her husbands killer Jimmy Thompson is whom he feels she's covering up for.This goes on and out until the truth or tooth pops up out of the rubble revealing just who the victim of all this confusion really is!****SPOILERS**** Not much to see here in who the one who was found burnt to a crisp is but the reasons for all this to happen. It was "Sad Sack" Taylor a failure in everything that he did in life who in fact failed in his final attempt to end it all in his fatal fight with Jimmy Thompson who tried to help him out of his troubles. It was poor and confused Diana who ended up facing jail time in attempting to help her by them mentally deranged husband Jack's murder victim Jimmy Thompson escape justice. It was only by Jack coming back from the dead and telling the truth to what really happened that saved both her and well as Jack from both ending up in the cooler.

One of the stodgier of the British crime films of the 1950s that I've watched. The story in this low budget tale is a love triangle between a glamorous housewife, her hard-working, self-employed, and down on his luck husband, and her suave lover. The backdrop of industry hangs over the proceedings, but when a quarrel leads to a violent argument and death, BURNT EVIDENCE turns into a police procedural drama.Sadly it's a slow moving affair rather lacking in intrigue or indeed interest. The nature of the plot means that the principal characters have to disappear from the screen about a third of the way in at which point it all becomes rather aimless and unfocused, only to clear things up for the lacklustre ending. Jane Hylton is an arresting presence but would be better suited as a gangster's moll than the housewife she portrays here, although Duncan Lamont successfully portrays his character's world weariness. Watch out for old-timer Kynaston Reeves as a pathologist, Irene Handl in an improbable wig, and co-star Donald Gray's false left arm.

This was one of many B feature films produced between 1951 and 1962 (see IMDb for details) by the ACT - the cinema technicians trade union. The films seem to have in common, a good all British cast, reasonably resourced production values and themes rather off the mainstream, generally centred on the domestic but with an underlying serious work/economic theme. This although ostensibly a (lurid) crime who-dunnit, could well have been titled "The Perils of Self-Employment" - the conclusion makes this abundantly clear. The central character is a modest carpenter with a small but failing business, "too soft" to press for money owing and consequently on the edge of bankruptcy and losing his (improbably rather glamorous and stylish wife, Jane Hilton) to a suave and moneyed rival. The weakness seems to be in the writing/direction - perhaps the emphasis on a serious theme compromised the other elements but it left room for some wit, by no means flat-footed, with the humane detective (Meridith Edwards) and his dim assistant. Surprisingly the screenplay was by Ted Willis who was to become a respected name in TV. Overall it was of a quality that could have been an evening's highlight on the ITV of the day, watched from the sofa whilst eating a "TV dinner". The theme - everyday working life and the domestic economy - would rarely if ever be on the screen again. A 5.5

This bottom of the bill British thriller was recently given an airing on satellite TV.Duncan Lamont plays an electrician whose business is failing.His wife,Jane Hylton,is getting rather too close to his friend played by Donald Gray.She goes to try and persuade Gray to lend her £300 that Lamont needs for materials for a big contract.Lamont catches them together and jumps to the wrong conclusion.Eventually there is a confrontation between Lamont and Gray at Lamonts shed and a gum goes off and a fire ensues.We don't know who has been burnt to death but we have a shrewd guess.Enter the police in the guise of Meredith Edwards and Cyril Smith.It appears that most of the time they spend smoking ,pipes in particular and drinking endless cups of tea.What then follows is an investigation totally devoid of mystery ,suspense,action and thrills.It is poorly plotted and totally lacks any element of entertainment.The only bright spot is the appearance of Irene Handel.In an early scene she is shown wearing a long wig with a fringe.She is then given a perm by Jane Hylton and emerges with short hair and a perm.This is probably the most entertaining scene in the film.Also it is worth mentioning that Donald Gray lost an arm in the war.So you will see that most of his scenes are shot with his right arm facing the camera.In a couple of scenes you do see his left arm with a prosthetic left hand.It makes you feel that if this is what film makers believed cinema goers wanted little wonder that they were deserting the cinemas in droves for TV.